creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Mark Shields
Mark Shields
11 Feb 2012
Religion Provides Added Value to U.S.

Without the courage and the constancy of Methodists and of Quakers, the struggle to abolish slavery in the … Read More.

4 Feb 2012
“He Could Have Been a Contender ...”

At the 1972 Democratic convention that nominated Sen. George McGovern of South Dakota for president, McGovern'… Read More.

28 Jan 2012
Why Newt Scares Republicans

Hymie Shorenstein, a legendary Democratic leader in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn, was renowned for … Read More.

Before They Vote for You, People Must Like You

Share Comment

On Jan. 21, 1971, the 55 Democratic U.S. senators caucused to elect by secret ballot their party leaders. Sen. Ted Kennedy, who had been elected to the Democrats' No. 2 Senate job, majority whip, two years earlier, was challenged by West Virginia Sen. Robert C. Byrd. In an unexpected upset, Byrd defeated Kennedy by a vote of 31 to 24.

The rejection of Kennedy by his colleagues — coming barely 18 months after the death of Mary Jo Kopechne, a former campaign aide to his late brother Robert, at Chappaquiddick in a car the Massachusetts senator had been driving — was a serious blow to his national stature. But Kennedy, concealing what must have been painful disappointment with humor, publicly thanked "the 29 Democratic senators who pledged to vote for me ... and especially the 24 who actually did."

Kennedy has been almost universally, and rightly, praised as a legislative giant of historic influence and achievement. But what has been mostly slighted is that Ted Kennedy was so widely liked by nearly everyone whom he encountered — including, most especially, his political adversaries. Former Republican senator from Maine Bill Cohen once explained, "I don't care how great your ideas are or how well you can articulate them, people must like you before they will vote for you." People — from elevator operators to Senate pages to conservative Republicans — liked Ted Kennedy.

After the assassination of his brother Robert on June 5, 1968, the 36-year-old Ted Kennedy almost surely could have won the Democratic presidential nomination at the party's warring Chicago convention. Every four years, he led all challengers in the national public opinion surveys. Every four years, he did not run — until 1980, when polls showed him ahead of the incumbent Democratic president, Jimmy Carter, by two to one.

On Nov.

4, 1979, two events occurred that doomed Ted Kennedy's candidacy: In Tehran, a group of Iranians, furious at the fact that the Shah had been admitted to the U.S. for medical treatment, overran the U.S. embassy and took 60 Americans hostage. And CBS broadcast Kennedy's disastrous television interview with Roger Mudd.

The taking and holding (for the next 14 months) of the American hostages initially worked to the political advantage of the embattled Carter. Overnight, he was seen as commander in chief. The nation rallied in support. That was beyond Kennedy's control. But the Mudd interview was a disaster largely of his own making.

When Mudd, not unexpectedly, asked Kennedy why he wanted to be president, Kennedy stumbled and stammered, unable to provide a coherent answer.

Kennedy lost that 1980 race to Carter and would never again seek the White House. But he managed to use self-deprecating humor to later address his own inarticulateness in that fatal interview. He publicly joked how Mudd "came up to my house on Cape Cod and sat on one of my chairs on my front lawn and asked me trick questions, like, 'Why do you want to be president?'"

Of his unfulfilled chief executive ambitions, Kennedy frequently joked: "Frankly, I don' t mind not being president. I just mind that someone else is."

Ted Kennedy understood that politics is basically a matter of addition, not subtraction. He knew well that humor, especially self-deprecating humor, can soothe and heal and disarm. Humor says to a colleague or a constituent, "I'm not self-important; I, too, know my faults; I recognize I'm not any better than you are."

Kennedy worked long and hard at the difficult craft of writing and passing laws. But he understood better than almost anybody else that "people must like you before they will vote for you." And all kinds of people, including me, really did like him.

To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

COPYRIGHT 2009 MARK SHIELDS


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;...If you take a look at Mr. Kennedy as history must, you will see a place holder...If he had been Caesar, he would never have crossed the Rubicon... If he had been Jefferson, we would not have the Declaration of Independence, and if he had been Lincoln, we would not have the Emancipation Proclimation...The ability to see clearly and act firmly were not in his character... Like so many others, he said the Democratic party speaks for the people, and never minds how much they stop up the mouths of the people with sop so they cannot speak for themselves... We all know we must work with others to achieve good... Where was the good in opposing Mr. President Carter only because he was vulnerable, and honest, and did not know how to manipulate the beltway system??? That man helped to give us Reagan, and helped us to realize all of Mr. Carter's worst fears for this country...At least Mr. Carter was a man, and could tell it like it is...People like Mr. Kennedy are too common in every community in this country...Without doubt, they get things done; but it is by way of denying the people justice to hold power for ones own self...He is lauded and larded with syrup from politicians on both sides, and from every party...It is because he moved for the left, and moved with only baby steps for the right... Not one of them can say how we shall reach virtue, or honor, or morality, or community, or justice, or welfare, or tranquility with baby steps...We need not alone haste; but a firm and true purpose...If we should die with the acclaim of our enemies and with the envy of our friends, and have left the mighty work of this day to other generations, we deserve no more than ignomy...I would trade a thousand Kennedys for any number who can seek, and bear, and speak the truth...And the fact is, that such people who can tell the truth as they see it will never stand for election, or be elected...No matter how essential is truth to democracy it is not a democratic virtue...To do justice we must often say what few wish to hear, and to be elected we must flatter, and fill empty humanity with shine...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Mon Aug 31, 2009 12:43 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mark Shields
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 16 Feb 2012

19 Nov 2011 Thanksgiving -- The Holiday You Have to Love

12 Jun 2010 The "No Month in the Country" Campaign Strategy

13 Dec 2008 Both Dumb and Crazy?