creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Mark Shields
Mark Shields
19 May 2012
A Price Tag on Patriotism

Will Rogers was wrong. The legendary humorist, speaking of the responsibilities each of us has as a citizen … Read More.

12 May 2012
Shortcuts for 2012 Campaign

Please accept the following as a small token of appreciation from your semi-faithful correspondent, who knows … Read More.

5 May 2012
Slinging Mud

Indiana Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels was characteristically candid when speaking to the Indianapolis Star's … Read More.

A Skeptical America

Share Comment

Late-night comedians use an old trick to bond with tonight's audience by poking fun at the alleged dim-wittedness or surliness of last night's audience. It's a favorite motif of David Letterman, who once used the Federal Reserve's pegging of the federal funds rate at just above zero to quip, "I haven't seen interest this low since last night's audience."

But it's a good bet that Letterman or Jay Leno or Jimmy Kimmel or Conan O'Brien has never faced a crowd as despairing and distrustful as the Sept. 8 national audience, to which President Barack Obama will speak on the U.S. job crisis; Americans, famous for their indomitable self-confidence, are now racked by self-doubt.

Bill McInturff, the Republican half of the respected Hart-and-McInturff polling duo — they conduct the Wall Street Journal-NBC News survey — offers an alarming, nonpartisan analysis of today's public mood. Based on public polls and surveys and focus groups he did for his own firm, Public Opinion Strategies, McInturff concludes that the (mis)handling of the debt ceiling ranks with the Iranian hostage crisis, Hurricane Katrina and the Lehman Brothers collapse and subsequent recessions as a pivotal event "profoundly and sharply reshaping views of the economy and federal government." He goes on: "It has led to a scary erosion in confidence in both, at a time when this steep drop in confidence can be least afforded."

On the debt ceiling, it was not just the end product the parties eventually slapped together that soured people's attitudes but "the manner in which this issue was debated and resolved." As McInturff writes, public "views about this process are clear, and are overwhelmingly negative."

Granted, Americans have never been uncritical fans of their country's political system, but how about this for a dramatic drop in satisfaction? In 2009 and again this year, The Washington Post asked, "How satisfied are you with the way this country's political system is working — very satisfied, mostly satisfied, mostly dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied?"

Two years ago, 38 percent reported they were satisfied, while 61 percent answered "dissatisfied" (with 31 percent reporting "very dissatisfied").

The most recent results: just 21 percent satisfied and 78 percent dissatisfied (while 45 percent are very dissatisfied).

While Republicans in Congress consistently receive lower grades than the Democratic president, it is a rule of U.S. politics that when things are good, it is the president who gets the credit, and when things are bad, it is the president who takes the political hit.

Coincidentally, Peter Hart released a poll this week done for CitiBank that contained equally dismal news on consumers' pessimism. Today, three years after the financial collapse, nearly three out of four Americans believe that the economy has not yet hit rock bottom. Since last January, when 63 percent of people believed that business conditions were good, that number has plummeted from 51 percent in April to just 41 percent today.

McInturff notes that since 1952, on only four other occasions — 1974 (Nixon resigned, home sales were down 40 percent, inflation rose to 13.9 percent); 1979 (sixty-two hostages were taken in Iran, the oil crisis created filling-station lines, the prime rate was at 15.75 percent); 1990 (GNP dropped after a record eight years of growth, housing values took a nosedive after the savings-and-loan scandal, Iraq invaded Kuwait); and 2008 (no reminders needed) — has the consumer confidence number measured by the Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index fallen below 65 percent.

You don't need to be a historian to remember that in each of the presidential elections immediately following those last four low-consumer-confidence years, party control of the White House changed.

Consumer confidence fell nearly 16 points from an already low number in July to 55.7 percent in August. To put this in some historical context, over the last half-century, the average consumer index for re-elected incumbent presidents has been 95.9 percent, while the average consumer confidence score of defeated incumbents has been 78.4 percent — which is itself a long climb from the current 55.7 percent.

Facing a dispirited and pessimistic constituency, President Obama might take some comfort in the words of John F. Kennedy in the midst of the Cuban Missile Crisis: "This is the week I earn my salary."

To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

COPYRIGHT 2011 MARK SHIELDS


Comments

10 Comments | Post Comment
"Americans, famous for their indomitable self-confidence, are now racked by self-doubt."
Good article, but wrong statement here. We are not racked by self-doubt, we are racked by poor and unresponsive leadership. Ask a person from the tea party "Are you getting the response you desire?'" No, they are not. They are getting requests to go to hell from Maxine Waters and called rascists by others. No matter what anyone says, it is the leaders that trashed everything while taxpayers were going to work and producing. It is obvious that our main leader thinks all playing fields must be levelled, this means other countries enjoy rising status while we must fall back. Nonsense, and yet both parties have played into this. The scary moments come when Time Magazine writes about their dissatisfaction with the Constitution because the founders couldn't foresee Lady Gaga. The founders lived in the age of Mozart, and this is what modern clown pundits with Ivy League credentials come up with? These are the idiots that want to open the constitution and tinker with it. Jethro Bodine under the hood there. Frightening. We don't need mission statements, pep talks, gavel to gavel coverage, talking heads, 24/7, "going forward", green jobs, or help growing our business. We just need the thick layers of government and media to back off, shut up, and get out of our way. We can take the world to new heights if we catch some blessed confidence and respectful silence from these two institutions.

Comment: #1
Posted by: Tom
Fri Sep 2, 2011 8:19 AM
More like this is the week the Roosevelt vs Carter image is sealed. Jimmy here he comes.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Masako
Fri Sep 2, 2011 8:02 PM
P.S. Hope he's not planning on running in any marathons.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Masako
Fri Sep 2, 2011 8:03 PM
Does ANYBODY in this country see what the Republicans have done to this country in the last 30+ years?! Do you really think that a fine man like President Obama can solve all your problems alone? He continues to try but the %$#@!!% Republicans and Rabid Tea Party crowd block his every attempt. So I guess after we have lost the best President to come along since Kennedy we can all work for the Chinese, Kiss the Republican A**, cover our own ass at our neighbors expense, blame the Democrats and SIT AROUND AND BITCH!! After all that is what we are best at. This country is in REAL trouble and what are the Republicans doing to address the issues?! Have you looked at the distribution of wealth lately!? Maybe if you are real nice to the top 1% that control the wealth in this country they will let you wash their car.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Bill
Sat Sep 3, 2011 6:05 AM
Nah, we don't see what others demand we see because terms such as "%$#@!!% Republicans and Rabid Tea Party crowd", " Kiss the Republican A**", " cover our own ass at our neighbors expense", SIT AROUND AND BITCH!!" don't really express arguments or clear thoughts; they are just anger boiling over and we are uncertain if it is just adolescent angst or bullying. The country is in real trouble and the rage depicted by these words will only make things worse. This is neither a good economy or happy country right now. 9%+ are unemployed, 16% in the black community. Yeah, Obama is a real messiah. I'm sorry the screamer doesn't want to admit what a poor President he is. There is no more money to spend or debt to pile up no matter how much you yell. Taxes and spending are not the solution, no matter how loud you yell. But go ahead, call everybody else an a** if it makes you feel smart. You just don't sound smart; try words not usually found in the gutter, or maybe try more persuasive arguments. Got any of either?
Comment: #5
Posted by: Tom
Sat Sep 3, 2011 5:00 PM
Obama was a nice try. I voted for him myself. Alas, the simple Republican criticism turned out to be true. He just doesn't have enough experience. All of his team are a bunch of untried newbies too.

You can't ignore that. He bailed out the banks and got no lending in return.

In a business environment, that alone would have got him fired. Four hard years of on-the-job training and mistake after mistake along the way. He should have been a governor for 8 years, or at least a mayor. Law school and life as carefree legislator don't bring you the skills you need to be an executive

For many are called, but few are chosen. And many can make the sale, but few can deliver the goods. That's the sad truth in American politics.

It would be nice if the Dems could field another candidate, and I don't mean Hillary, another zero without one whit of true experience, but it"s not going to happen.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Masako
Sat Sep 3, 2011 9:05 PM
ON this Labor Day, is Shields EVER going to make mention, to say
nothing of give place, to the awesome devastation of the Globalist's
RED China sellout, TREASON and EUGENICS OP?
Time to break those David Rockefeller funded and directed Freemasonic
ranks.
Afterall, we're NOT getting any younger, and helllbound eternity
gets more vivid by the day.
Shields is absolutelly NOWHERE to be found on this CORE issue.
Comment: #7
Posted by: free bee
Sat Sep 3, 2011 10:05 PM
Re: Masako

I couldn't vote for McCain either. I saw him as a continuation of Bush II's policies, and I didn't vote for hin the second time, I went with Kerry. This happens, I voted for Carter way back, a very nice man who would talk to us wearing a sweater. Maybe he just hadn't ripened yet, but things got pretty ugly towards the end of his term. It took Reagan 3 years of his first term to turn things around. God I miss Bubba, he had the same ease of character Reagan had, only Clinton was funnier. An underrated President. I don't like Obama, it seems apparent that he does not like America or Americans. I don't like to be scolded by people younger and less intelligent than myself. Call it the idiot threshold. Obama averages just about at the ankles of most citizens. His threshold is lower than ants doing the limbo. Maybe he should don a sweater to soften his grim image. We saw the best of him while campaigning, the worst has been revealed since. So I have buyers remorse, and it would be okay if the stakes weren't so high. Problem is I don't see any alternative yet. I think a republican turnover in the Senate might create the resistance we need to navigate through this strange administration, the Rep field looks like a pack of McCains to me.

Comment: #8
Posted by: Tom
Sun Sep 4, 2011 6:48 AM
President Obama has been the subject of an overwhelming commitment by the opposition to reject any proposal brought forth that might lead to economic growth. Clearly the White House has decided to stay a middle course in hopes of capturing the independent vote in the 2012 election. I do not fault President Obama for pursuing such a strategy. It does make political sense. Ronald Reagan was reelected in 1984 with unemployment at 8%. There is still time for the current unemployment figure to drop and President Obama needs to forcefully make his case during his speech Thursday night. I hate to think what the state of affairs would be right now if Obama had not won the election. I hate to think what could happen if Obama is not reelected in 2012.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Robert Kretzmer
Sun Sep 4, 2011 1:23 PM
Re: Robert Kretzmer: If Obama had not won the election the Dems would be in the catbird's seat now. Obama himself fully appreciated the risk of taking the helm when he did--read Maureen Dowd's column in the NY Times.
Comment: #10
Posted by: Masako
Sun Sep 4, 2011 7:34 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mark Shields
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

25 Aug 2007 A De Facto National Primary: Is This What We Want?

11 Sep 2010 We Have Seen This Movie Before

30 Oct 2010 A Real Republican Wiseman