creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Linda Chavez
Linda Chavez
25 May 2012
Overreach by Unions in Wisconsin

The Wisconsin recall election of Republican Gov. Scott Walker is not going quite like the unions and the … Read More.

18 May 2012
Family Mysteries

Like many Americans, genealogy has been a keen interest of mine. I've had a good sense of where my family … Read More.

11 May 2012
Loose Lips Endanger Lives

The U.S. dodged another terrorist bullet when a would-be "underwear bomber" turned out to be a … Read More.

Why History Matters

Share Comment

For years, conservatives have rightly decried the distortion, misrepresentation and downright ignorance of American history that has sometimes infected left-wing rhetoric. We've complained that public schools do a poor job of teaching our history and an even worse job of transmitting American values. History matters; as the philosopher George Santayana famously said: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

But what happens when a conservative gets it wrong? Last week, Rep. Michele Bachmann gave a speech to Iowans for Tax Relief in which she said that the Founders "worked tirelessly until slavery was no more in the United States." MSNBC host Chris Matthews called Bachmann a "balloon head" for her remarks, and others in the media and on the left were no less scathing. But some conservatives defended Bachmann's remarks — even though she mangled her history.

There is no question that a double standard exists — the media is much quicker to draw attention to conservatives' faux pas than to liberals'. There's not a great deal we can do about that, so conservatives have to be especially careful when we speak — especially on race. What's more, because conservatives care so much about history and tradition, we must be sure we have the facts right, and Bachman didn't. And it wasn't just her specific reference to the Founders' efforts to end slavery but her understanding of the struggle for equal rights that went awry.

As every schoolchild should know, slavery was not abolished until the ratification of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. President Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, issued in the third year of the Civil War, freed only those slaves living in states that had seceded from the Union. And, of course, some of our Founders — most notably George Washington and Thomas Jefferson — not only did not "work tirelessly until slavery was no more" but owned slaves.

Washington's attitude toward slavery evolved during his lifetime and he asked in his will that the slaves he owned be emancipated after the death of his wife, Martha. Jefferson wrote eloquently about the abomination of slavery but freed only seven of the hundreds of slaves he owned, only two during his lifetime and five upon his death.

But even the abolition of slavery did not usher in an era of colorblind equal rights like that invoked by Bachmann in her Iowa speech. In speaking about the nation's founding principle of e pluribus unum — out of many, one — Bachmann said that "our ancestors when they arrived on these shores ... it didn't matter the color of their skin, it didn't matter their language ... it made no difference once you got here, we were all the same." But that was not the case through much of our history well into the latter half of the 20th Century.

The realization of colorblind equal opportunity came about through decades of struggle. It took not only a Civil War, the bloodiest in our nation's history, costing more than 600,000 lives, but a hundred-year campaign for civil rights that culminated in the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the 1965 Voting Rights Act, and the 1968 Fair Housing Act. Along the way, we often stumbled. Congress passed laws restricting immigration to the United States based on race and national origin. States denied basic rights to blacks and others by law, setting up state-required segregation, which the Supreme Court approved until its landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.

Michele Bachmann should know this history; she aspires to be a conservative leader — perhaps even a presidential candidate — after all.

Conservatives should not sugarcoat our history any more than liberals sometimes denigrate it. The most remarkable fact of our history is not that we have fallen short of our ideal that all men are created equal but that we have made progress toward realizing that goal in our ongoing endeavor to secure equal rights.

Linda Chavez is the author of "An Unlikely Conservative: The Transformation of an Ex-Liberal." To find out more about Linda Chavez, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

7 Comments | Post Comment
Linda Chavez has inspired me. That inspiration has led me to edit her opening paragraph so that it reflects the state of things as they really are:
"For years, LIBERALS have rightly decried the distortion, misrepresentation and downright ignorance of American history that has SO OFTEN infected RIGHT-wing rhetoric. We've complained that public schools do a poor job of teaching our history and an even worse job of transmitting American values. History matters; as the philosopher George Santayana famously said: 'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'"
Comment: #1
Posted by: M. L. Walter
Fri Jan 28, 2011 5:15 AM
Please provide examples of "distortion, misrepresentation and downright ignorance of American history that has sometimes infected left-wing rhetoric" that are as atrocious as Bachmann's.
Comment: #2
Posted by: liberal
Fri Jan 28, 2011 6:01 AM
"...we must be sure we have the facts right, and Bachman didn't."
The perfect sentence in which to misspell Bachmann.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Tony
Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:21 AM
Linda Chavez writes "...because conservatives care so much about history and tradition, we must be sure we have the facts right, and Bachman didn't."
Not getting facts right is saying there were 14 original colonies instead of 13. Bachman's view of American history is a total fantasy. Tea Partiers have, since they reached the national limelight in 2009, have recast - rewritten actually - history solely to support their demands for change.
Perhaps people with little knowledge of history will take what Bachman said to be literally true. Educated people know that the early Colonists weren't tolerant of different religions. The colonial elite used the notion of race to take land from Native Americans because they were heathens - and justified enslaving Africans because they weren't civilized. This may not be a proud moment in American history, but it is American history. We can't change historical events 300 years after they occured.
People are free to interpret history as they like -- that's the reason why revisionist history is such a popular genre. It serves to show that the received wisdom about a series of events is inaccurate or too slanted.
Conservatives and Tea Partiers must stick to facts when using American history to justify their aims. We have every reason to be proud of our history - warts and all. It serves no one well to turn the actions of our forefathers into fiction when calling for change in our body politic.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Anne Reuter
Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:30 AM
Re: Tony

Good catch! I should have checked the spelling myself. Wonder if Chavez will blame this on 'the liberal media.'
Comment: #5
Posted by: Anne Reuter
Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:33 AM
Really? I mean...really? The left-wing distorts history? Have you not been paying attention to recent history? How about Haley Barbour and his comments on slavery? Or pick up the paper and read anything Sarah Palin has to say on any given day...that will create a sputnick moment for you. Or check Politifact for the lie of the year and other gems put forth by conservatives. Or ask a right-winger if WMD's were found in Iraq? Or if FDR caused the great depression? Or if the Civil War was fought over slavery or not? Or whether or not there is even a 14th amendment in the constitution?
The article is a fluff piece with no substance. If the left distorts history as much as claimed by the author...there should be a ton of examples that could be provided. Check the school books in Texas and Virginia for citations...
Comment: #6
Posted by: Kmmalone
Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:58 AM
I love that this is a "faux pas". HIlarious! A faux pas is using the wrong fork, or maybe in Bachmann's case, looking into the wrong camera lens while on TV. I would even call it a faux pas if she said the Civil War was in the 1760's instead of the 1860's--mistakes happen. Relating an absolutely inaccurate version of our country's entire history in order to deify the founding fathers and suggest an alternate reality for our country's history, well, that just isn't a faux pas, IMHO. This is more like abject stupidity if she really believes it (and reason enough alone to disqualify her from any higher office) or outright propaganda if she doesn't, but said it anyway.
Comment: #7
Posted by: kygirl93
Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:30 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Linda Chavez
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

20 Mar 2009 Defending AIG

24 Aug 2007 All the Pretty Horses

1 Feb 2008 The Ghost of Ronald Reagan