creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Linda Chavez
Linda Chavez
10 Feb 2012
Referendum on the Incumbent

Conventional wisdom suggests that the current refusal of the GOP base to accept Mitt Romney as the de facto … Read More.

3 Feb 2012
Feminists Are Anti-Choice

Horror of horrors! Lego has introduced a new line of gender-specific toys aimed at girls. I might not even … Read More.

27 Jan 2012
For Gingrich, Amnesty no Impediment to Nomination

One thing was missed in Newt Gingrich's victory in the South Carolina primary: Conservatives embraced a pro-… Read More.

The Conservative Challenge

Share Comment

Many on the Left are hopeful that this election will drive the nail in the coffin of the conservative movement. There is some cause for legitimate concern among conservatives. No matter who wins the election, conservatives will have a more difficult time making our influence felt than at any time in recent memory.

For all his many admirable qualities, John McCain has never been a movement conservative. If he's elected he will be just as interested in forging bipartisan compromise as he will be in standing on conservative principle.

If Barack Obama becomes president, conservatives will have a convenient foil. But the weakness of our movement now makes it less likely that conservatives will be effective in stopping the worst excesses of an Obama administration. The Obama-Reid-Pelosi juggernaut will likely roll over any conservative opposition, unless conservatives come together and bring the American people with them.

But conservatives have been down before — and it is too early to count us out. Conservatives watched their hero, Barry Goldwater, lose the presidency in 1964, but we found a more appealing and effective standard-bearer in Ronald Reagan. A decade and a half later, Reagan was in the White House and the conservative movement was ascendant.

If conservatism is to rise again, however, it must offer a coherent and compelling alternative, both to the politics that have dominated this election cycle and to the past eight years of GOP leadership. With no obvious successor to Reagan waiting in the wings to reinvigorate, much less reinvent, 21st century conservatism, we will not be rescued by the charisma of a single individual.

The first task is to define what conservatism stands for today. In the Reagan era, it was lower taxes, smaller government, a strong national defense, and resistance to the culture of permissiveness that was the byproduct of the Sixties and Seventies. Fiscal conservatives, defense hawks, and social conservatives worked side by side contentedly in the Reagan coalition. But that coalition has been badly frayed during the past eight years.

Conservatives have watched as a Republican White House and GOP-controlled Congress enlarged government, expanded domestic programs, and raised a mountain of debt.

The collapse of credit markets in the past few weeks has also occasioned the greatest government intervention in the free market since the New Deal — but this time led by a putatively conservative and Republican administration.

Since Reagan, conservatives have also been impotent to prevent the counterculture from becoming the mainstream culture. And with the fall of the Soviet Union, conservatives even began to split over national defense. Islamic fundamentalism poses a grave threat to the West; I would argue, as great a threat as communism. But conservatives differ not only over how best to counter it but whether Islamism can or should be defeated.

So what are the pillars of conservatism today? Clearly, a commitment to individual rights, limited government, and free enterprise has historically had the broadest appeal within the conservative movement. But where does that leave social and religious conservatives? Will the new conservatism provide a place at the table to those who are more motivated by moral than by economic issues? And while all conservatives would say they believe in a strong national defense, there remain irreconcilable disagreements among the different factions of the conservative movement on how to keep America strong.

Perhaps adversity will prove to unite conservatives. If, as many of us fear, an Obama administration and an expanded Democratic congressional majority move the United States closer to European-style social democracy, conservatives will coalesce to resist it. But, to be successful, we must offer an alternative vision — one that appeals beyond movement circles to the general public.

Americans intuitively know that free market capitalism creates wealth that benefits more people than government redistribution, but their faith has been tested in recent weeks. And with an Obama administration promising an ever-expanding welfare state — and more importantly, one that provides benefits to the middle class, much as European social democracies have for decades — Americans will be tempted to think they will be better off if government decides to "spread the wealth around."

Conservatism rose phoenix-like out of the ashes of the Goldwater defeat. It will take a similar feat to rescue the movement now. No less than the future of the United States depends on it.

Linda Chavez is the author of "An Unlikely Conservative: The Transformation of an Ex-Liberal." To find out more about Linda Chavez, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Ma'am; ... Do you find such labels as conservative and liberal enlightening, useful, or empowering??? I think the conservatives have a great advantage in the label game because who isn't conservative??? If you find a person starving to death, they would rather hold the misery they have than embrace some unknown evil or uncertain future, so it is hardly a fair contest to put up a conservative against a liberal... We are all conservatives... I am a revolutionary because I consider it a conservative value in a country formed out of revolution... But that is a tough sell where people in their souls fear change, as all human beings are want to do... Consider this: If Mr. Obama and the Democrats run this country fairly and intelligently, in four years they will be the choice of conservatives because any change will then have to be sold to the conservative people who hate change.... Rather than endure that contest fairly; sabotage the presidency... use every bit of power remaining to the republican party to resist all change, to abuse the democrats for any mis-step, and spread mis information and abuse of the Liberals far and wide... It may be a pyrhic victory you will achieve, but sooner or later the inability of government to actually forestall ruin will run out the welcome mat for the republicans... The question is, do you thinksociety works just because it works for you... I mean, clearly it butters your bread, but do you think this government thing works for people??? You call yourself conservative because that is your guiding ideology... Another calls himself liberal because that is his guiding ideology... Where is our common ideology??? What would it be if we could name it??? Is it freedom and justice for all??? Perhaps the conservatives follow freedom into excess, and the liberals follow justice into the bar... But as the ship of state tacks into a squall line no one seems aware of the reef and the rocks beyond... It would be good, and even healthy, if the whole people could find a way of talking out our differences and framing them in human terms... We all know, or think we know where our self interest lies, but our individual goals really need the support of the whole population... And you see that support, and agreement which makes nations out of individuals is wanting... So, rather than trying to be a bull horn of conservative people, why not talk as a person to a person, as a representative of humanity to humanity, claiming no more than equal rights... It is a problem in this land that we define rights as property and property as a right... Niether is exactly true, and each statement denies the essentials of rights to all people... As a conservative, you have nothing in common with myself as a human being... Your movement is a fight for power, and that power has been misused... Nothing will prove this better than the election of Mr. Obama, because it would not be possible if conservatism did not abuse people of their rights, and mislead the country... Join the human race... Pick up the dusty, trampled on standard of humanity which has always been our own, and hold it skyward... This society will work for all, or it is a dead ideology, like conservatism itself... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:19 AM
This piece is probably one of the numerous reasons you all will lose (hopefully). You all keep assuming that the ONLY reason that republicans are behind now, and the conservative movement has lost all steam is because of the Bush years. It's a big factor, but not the biggest. It's called changing demographics. Your philosophy is old, and thinking that you all should move more back to the right in order to get the people behind you again is ridiculous and unrealistic.
Comment: #2
Posted by: MB
Mon Nov 3, 2008 9:45 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Linda Chavez
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012

4 Jan 2008 The Sound of Silence

11 Feb 2011 Slaying Sacred Cows

20 Dec 2006 Finally, a Plan for Iraq