creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Linda Chavez
Linda Chavez
10 Feb 2012
Referendum on the Incumbent

Conventional wisdom suggests that the current refusal of the GOP base to accept Mitt Romney as the de facto … Read More.

3 Feb 2012
Feminists Are Anti-Choice

Horror of horrors! Lego has introduced a new line of gender-specific toys aimed at girls. I might not even … Read More.

27 Jan 2012
For Gingrich, Amnesty no Impediment to Nomination

One thing was missed in Newt Gingrich's victory in the South Carolina primary: Conservatives embraced a pro-… Read More.

Power Grab

Share Comment

The Obama administration is engaged in the most sweeping power grab in modern American history, but few people seem to care. In barely four months, we've witnessed the president and his minions taking over insurance companies, banks, and car companies, forcing private companies to sell off assets, appease unions, and stiff bondholders. Administration officials have insisted some companies take government handouts even if they don't want them and told others they can't pay back the money they've borrowed until the government gives them permission. Now, the president has decided he'll appoint a "compensation czar" whose job it will be to decide what constitutes fair pay for corporate executives. Why stop there? And, of course, they won't.

The latest move — the appointment of Washington lawyer Kenneth Feinberg to oversee pay of the top employees at seven companies that have taken government funds — may not seem radical, but it is. Earlier this year, in response to public criticism of the retention bonuses paid to some executives at the troubled insurance giant AIG, the administration proposed capping executive pay at $500,000 at firms receiving government assistance through the Troubled Asset Relief Program. But Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner abandoned that plan when he finally figured out that the execs would simply bail on the company, leaving the government without experienced and talented hands on deck.

So now the administration is moving to Plan B: Forget about pay caps per se but appoint a government overseer to set pay individually. Until now, in publicly traded companies that job fell to the board of directors and its compensation committee, whose legal and fiduciary responsibilities entail acting on behalf of shareholders. Directors are elected by the people who own the company: from individuals who own a few shares of stock to institutions and mutual funds that may own millions of shares.

The government, primarily through the Securities and Exchange Commission, oversees the board's stewardship, while other entities play a role as well. The securities exchanges — the New York Stock Exchange, NASDAQ, etc. — also have rules that govern the conduct of boards of directors, including restrictions on who sets executive compensation.

The compensation committee at publicly traded companies must be composed of entirely of independent directors — those who have no direct ties to the company or its management either by current or, in certain instances, former employment, for example.

Compensation committees act independent of management, but they don't act in a vacuum. They often hire compensation consultants (who must have no ties to the company) to advise them on the best pay practices. They evaluate their pay structure compared to other companies of similar size and complexity or who are in the same line of business. They evaluate the performance of key executives against financial results, the achievement of personal and company objectives, and other criteria. It is a long and arduous process (I know, for more than a decade I've served on and now chair the compensation committee of a NYSE company).

And the rules governing disclosure of executive compensation have become much stricter in recent years, especially since the enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley, federal legislation that passed in the wake of Enron and other recent corporate scandals. The law now requires that, in addition to a Compensation Committee Report on executive pay, management must produce an extensive compensation discussion and analysis to be included in proxy statements sent to all shareholders. The information includes a table showing exactly how much the CEO, chief financial officer, and three highest-paid employees in the company earn, including bonuses, stock options and grants, and what benefits and perquisites they are entitled to and their cost. Similar information is provided for director compensation. If shareholders don't think they're getting their money's worth from these executives or directors, they can dump the board of directors at the next election. Or at least that's how it is supposed to work.

But enter the Obama administration to rewrite the already extensive rules. Now one man — the compensation czar — is going to oversee this process at seven major corporations. And who oversees him?

From the president on down, the Obama administration is filled with people who have little or no idea how the market works. Most have never drawn a paycheck in the private sector, much less had to meet a payroll or make a profit. But they're convinced they know how to run things, down to the last detail. There's no word adequate to describe the sheer arrogance of this group.

Linda Chavez is the author of "An Unlikely Conservative: The Transformation of an Ex-Liberal." To find out more about Linda Chavez, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Ma'am;... Not being one to suffer fools in silence, let me reply... Unions are many people, and bond holders are few, and many bond holders have already walked away with much profit which the union workers made for them...Now; you suggest that contracts freely entered into should be trashed, and workers denied their rights, denied their pensions, and denied even their jobs only because of the greed, and unleashed greed of a few sucked all available wealth out of this society to invest beyond our shores... What control did the workers have over their affairs, or the world economy???...Let me tell you a story: There once was a Native American named Parker, and after peace he was told by some reporter that he would have to pick one wife out of his many, and tell the rest they were no longer his wives... The Native told the reporter: You tell them... Let me say the same thing..You tell them.... The workers had a legal contract, and they held up their ends of it... Now; you tell them that to preserve some rich peoples fortunes that they must give up what is their due... Go stand in a large group of them, and tell them to eat this crap...The problem is this: You rich fools count too much on the rule of law, and you count too much upon the natural morality of all people keeping violence last on their list...The people are the law, and when people feel abused by the law no one can count on the peace being maintained...The law must do justice...It is one thing to sit at your computer and suggest doing a wrong to this great number of people... Bond holders were always gambling on being able to get in, and get out, unscathed...They were taking a premium for doing nothing other than risking money... They did not invest their lives and labor in that adventure of building autos... So have some courage as all you rich people should, and dare to explain it to those people directly, that their lives invested were not nearly so valuable as the money the rich invested... Even that is a lie, since 60% of the money invested in the economy is union money, and they take a hit every time the rich take a hit; but you want to give it to them on both ends without so much as a message, or a kiss... Have the courage to put it to them directly... The rich people make a huge mistake to count on law, and to count on their police while they go about destroying their own economy... If the rest of society does not work, then law, no matter how glorified and respected by its practioners, -will not work either...Respect makes law... Morals make law; and to have morals and respect people must have communities that work...There is a tendency to look at working people as cattle, and as undeserving of respect or rights... You think people run scared of law??? The people are peaceful, and want nothing more than peace... But if your society does not work, and takes too much from them, then they will grow militant in a heartbeat...You do not want to see that close up... Stay hid, and snipe at that group from a distance as fits your courage... And what courage...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Jun 12, 2009 7:22 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Linda Chavez
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Jacob Sullum
Jacob SullumUpdated 15 Feb 2012
John Stossel
John StosselUpdated 15 Feb 2012

9 Jul 2010 Expand Educational Opportunity, Don't Restrict It

1 Feb 2008 The Ghost of Ronald Reagan

3 Jun 2011 Putting Children First