creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Linda Chavez
Linda Chavez
10 May 2013
Heritage's Scare Tactics

The immigration debate has taken a sudden and nasty turn with the publication of a new report by The Heritage … Read More.

3 May 2013
Don't Capitulate to North Korea

The sentencing of an American citizen to 15 years of hard labor in North Korea's infamous prison camps has … Read More.

26 Apr 2013
Could We Have Caught the Boston Bombers Earlier?

Twelve years after September 11, our intelligence and federal law enforcement agencies still haven't fixed … Read More.

All the President's Men

Comment

When one of Washington's most distinguished journalists — Bob Woodward — accuses the White House of rewriting history, even liberals should take note. And when the White House responds by threatening him, you would think the story would become a national scandal. What makes the story even more important is that it deals with an issue that has dominated the news in recent weeks: the Draconian budget cuts that will take effect on March 1 unless a last-minute deal is reached in Congress.

Woodward has accused the White House of misrepresenting the president's role in creating the plan to cut $1.2 trillion from the budget over the next decade. In his book "The Price of Politics," Woodward describes in detail how the idea for the sequester came about. Writing in The Washington Post on Feb. 22, Woodward said that "the automatic spending cuts were initiated by the White House and were the brainchild of (then Office of Management and Budget Director Jack) Lew and White House congressional relations chief Rob Nabors — probably the foremost experts on budget issues in the senior ranks of the federal government." Woodward not only names the individuals involved, but also gives exact timelines for when the discussions took place and how the final agreement came about.

Woodward's complaint is not only that the White House is trying to place sole responsibility for coming up with the idea of the automatic cuts on Republicans, but also that it has now demanded that Republicans accept tax increases as a part of any deal, which was explicitly rejected when the deal was cut. "So when the president asks that a substitute for the sequester include not just spending cuts but also new revenue, he is moving the goal posts. His call for a balanced approach is reasonable, and he makes a strong case that those in the top income brackets could and should pay more. But that was not the deal he made," he says.

Careful reporter that he is, Woodward phoned Gene Sperling, chief economic adviser to the president, before the article was to be published to get his version of events. But the phone call didn't go well, according to Woodward.

Sperling reportedly yelled at him for most of the conversation and then followed up with an email apologizing for raising his voice but also doing something far worse. The email, reprinted in Politico this week, shows Sperling threatening Woodward.

"I do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying ... that Potus (president of the United States) asking for revenues is moving the goal post. I know you may not believe this, but as a friend, I think you will regret staking out that claim."

Such ominous remarks coming from the president's economic adviser are meant to intimidate. Reporters — even one as famous as Woodward — need access to pursue stories. And if a top White House official lets it be known that a reporter is persona non grata in the White House, the message goes out to others not to talk.

Worse, it is an example of this White House's imperious style — one that hearkens back to another presidency with which Bob Woodward is all too familiar.

Woodward became a national figure as a young man reporting on the Watergate scandal that led to President Richard M. Nixon's resignation. Woodward's bestselling book, "All the President's Men," is a chilling account of what happens when the people surrounding the president decide that protecting their boss is more important than upholding the oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution, which each of them takes.

In the case of the Nixon White House, the corruption emanated from the Oval Office. Woodward is not accusing President Obama of directing his men (and they are mostly men) to try to squelch legitimate journalistic inquiry — but if the president is not at fault, he has an obligation to clear the record. And Obama is doing just the opposite.

In the days leading up to the automatic cuts, the president has been out campaigning against Republicans, laying on their shoulders full blame for failing to reach a deal. But it is the president who has rewritten the terms of the agreement reached in 2011.

Sperling's threat against a senior journalist was not made in a vacuum: It is an attempt to cover up the president's own dissembling. The only cure is for the president to admit his misstatements and hold accountable those who would flaunt their power to keep the truth from emerging.

Linda Chavez is the author of "An Unlikely Conservative: The Transformation of an Ex-Liberal." To find out more about Linda Chavez, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
The Article shows a nanosecond of the workings in the White House. Mr Woodward is meticulous in his reporting. This is a ray of sunshine of truth in a very stormy time in this country's transition. It would be irresponsible for any newspaper to not publish this article.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Charles Pemberton
Fri Mar 1, 2013 7:40 AM
This is the kind of crap we get when a victorious president and party are as incompetently opposed as they currently are by the moribund and dysfunctional Republican Party. We will see more and more of this shameless "we don't care, we don't have to" mentality until those bastards get some sense that the Repes will mount a competent opposition. Sad, but true.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Masako
Fri Mar 1, 2013 5:50 PM
Ma'am;... Failure and poverty does not make democrats, but success and money does make republicans...The not so filthy rich know how much they are paying to support government... All told, and not considering fees, or the considerable charity I give, my joint return tax rate to support all government is just under 18%... And for what??? I make no great personal demands upon government, but must pay, as with health insurance for all who don't, or cannot...No wonder people who must pay more resist tax increases..
Mr. Woodward has become a republican... Whether he knows it or not, he has begun to identify with rich people, many of whom actually have worked hard for what they have, and have not purposefully, or unusually, or illegally hurt anyone... If he looks casually, he will not see the vast stores of wealth that can be taxed and should have been taxed all along...Much of it has been exported as capital, so it is invisible, and if they government let it go, it cannot now tax it..Soon, not even the profits of those corporations will return here, and it will be forever gone... We could deny such wealth our protection... We could refuse to allow imports from those who pay us no tax; but the fact is that the capital we have spread far and wide does not appear as our national wealth, but as our national poverty...
It really is unfair to expect the remaining wealthy to pick up the tab for all those corporations who have turned their backs on the poverty they created, but I do expect many of our wealthy are still here, and warrants of arrest can be found for the departed... If we decide to tax our capital where ever it is, we can do so... If people do not like our society they can leave as poor as they came in, but no rich person should think as so many have, that they will raid us for wealth, and renounce citizenship, and leave.... What is the point of our vast police and military forces if they only protect the rich from the consequences of their crimes??? The tax laws always protected them... The constitution protected their wealth and property... The foreign policy and tax schemes of the government always encouraged the Americanization of the world through the export of our capital without regard for the poverty that would inevitably result, and now that the whole situation can no longer be maintained, -one of our republican journalists wants to cry about moving the goal posts... What does he know about economics??? What does he know about capitalism.... He may have been a champion of the left for bringing down a crooked president, but he did not destroy the republican party, or what they represent... They brought him down to their level... Easy money will soften the hardest morality, and that is what has become of Mr. Woodward... Pity his corrupted soul...
Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sun Mar 3, 2013 5:51 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Linda Chavez
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 15 May 2013
Dennis Prager
Dennis PragerUpdated 14 May 2013
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 14 May 2013

17 Jul 2009 Of Race, Gender and Justice

16 Mar 2007 Shooting Itself in the Foot Again

12 Oct 2012 Racial Preferences for the Privileged