opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Linda Chavez
Linda Chavez
5 Feb 2016
Doing the Honorable Thing in New Hampshire

New Hampshire may well be the end of the campaign trail for more GOP hopefuls, as Iowa was for Rand Paul, … Read More.

29 Jan 2016
President or Divider in Chief?

I'm trying to wrap my mind around what it will mean if Donald Trump wins the Iowa caucuses in a few days and … Read More.

22 Jan 2016
Political Pawns for the Democrats

The Supreme Court decided this week to take up the Obama administration's unilateral executive actions on immigration,… Read More.

Calling Out Trump


For months, responsible Republicans have been pussyfooting around Donald Trump. No one has been willing to take him on vigorously and consistently, not even other Republican presidential candidates, for fear of offending Trump's supporters. The hope has been that he will eventually implode and, when he does, the GOP will benefit from Trump's having attracted new voters into the party. Instead of attacking Trump, the mainstream candidates have engaged in a circular firing squad, trying to pick off each other in the hopes that whoever emerges will finally be able to best Trump. It's not working.

Trump traffics in hate. He began his campaign telling Americans that Mexican immigrants are rapists and drug dealers, who, when they aren't busy defiling women, are stealing jobs. He has promised to build a wall across our entire southern border to keep out the supposed hordes that are invading our country, even though illegal immigration is at a decades-long low. He insists that he'll make Mexico foot the bill for the wall's construction. He promises to round up 11 million illegal immigrants and send them back where they came from. When asked how he will do so, he invokes "Operation Wetback," the Eisenhower-era program that led to the deaths of hundreds of people; 88 died from heatstroke in one incident alone.

Trump quickly went from bashing Mexicans to calling for bans on Muslims. All Muslims. He slandered American Muslims for celebrating the attack on 9/11: "Hey, I watched when the World Trade Center came tumbling down. And I watched in Jersey City, New Jersey, where thousands and thousands of people were cheering as that building was coming down. Thousands of people were cheering," he told a crowd in November in Alabama. When no evidence could be produced to back up his false memory, he did what he always does. He doubled down.

If every one of his opponents had taken the debate stage following Trump's outrageous remarks and said in one voice that they won't stand for this demagoguery, he would not be where he is today, the leading candidate of the Republican Party.

Instead, they mostly ignored him or tried their own less-outrageous versions.

Ted Cruz has recently started to take on Trump in a systematic way in his TV ads, but even Cruz wilts when he stands on stage next to the man. Part of the problem is that, to one degree or another, most of the other candidates have demagogued on Trump's signature issue, immigration. And they've done so because they are afraid to stand up before conservative audiences and speak the truth. You can't tell me that Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush don't all know that illegal immigration is down, not up; that we spend more money on border enforcement than we do on all other federal criminal law enforcement combined; and that immigrants take jobs that others won't or can't do, with a net gain to the economy. Their reticence to set the record straight gives Trump free rein to get uglier every time he opens his mouth.

Expect it to get worse. At this point, Trump seems willing to say almost anything. He called Ted Cruz a "pussy" last week, repeating, to much laughter and applause, a line from a woman in the audience. His audiences are, in Trump's peculiar pronunciation, "yuge" — and that is why none of the candidates want to criticize him.

But there are other ways to appeal to lower-middle-class voters than by resorting to vulgar language and pandering to bigotry. These voters have legitimate concerns about the erosion of their wages and their diminished opportunities in an economy that has stagnated. But competition from immigrants isn't the problem. How many of these voters really want to work in poultry processing or agriculture or mopping floors and cleaning toilets anyway — jobs where immigrants, especially illegal immigrants, dominate?

It may be too late to stop Trump. I hope not, but my optimism dims with each debate, poll and primary. The candidates will have one more chance before the South Carolina vote, in Saturday's debate. Let's see if those who believe in something greater than themselves will stop taking shots at each other and focus on calling out Trump.

Linda Chavez is the author of "An Unlikely Conservative: The Transformation of an Ex-Liberal." To find out more about Linda Chavez, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



2 Comments | Post Comment
Spot on!
Comment: #1
Posted by: milkman
Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:14 AM
You clearly have never lost a loved one in a terrorist attack. Be happy for that. My cousin was brutally murdered in the San Bernardino shootings back in December. He went to work on 12/02 like any other day. Except on that day, he never went home to his loved ones.

Because two monsters brutally slaughtered him and 13 other innocent people. 2 people who were NOT on any terrorist watch list, but should have been.

And you're OK with that. You're OK with the 14 lives that were cut down that day. Shame on you. That makes you as evil as the killers themselves.

Donald Trump NEVER said to ban Muslims. He said ban them UNTIL a new, improved way of doing background checks on them could be figured out. And YOU have a problem with that. Shame on you yet again. Had a better format been in place, the slaughter of 14 innocents wouldn't have happened in San Bernardino on December 2, 2015 because the two lunatics responsible would never have set foot in the U.S. in the first place.

And still, you're OK with 14 innocent lives stripped away.

Prior to December 2, I had absolutely NO interest in political wars and battles. (That changes when someone you love is brutally murdered and no one cares or does anything about it). Donald Trump seems to be the ONLY candidate who has a plan to stop the murders of innocent Americans. And if keeping people out of the U.S. UNTIL (learn that word Linda...'UNTIL''s VERY important and yet you conveniently leave it out of your babbling articles) they can properly be screened is the solution to saving fellow Americans, then that is what must be done. Maybe you will grasp this when someone YOU love is brutally slaughtered. But I won't hold my breath. You're not the kind who will admit when she's wrong. And on this, you're dead wrong.

Fingers crossed that when Donald Trump WINS, you will pack your bags and leave the U.S. since you have absolutely NO concern or empathy for your fellow Americans.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Michelle Baker
Sun Feb 14, 2016 11:14 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Linda Chavez
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 14 Feb 2016
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 14 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 13 Feb 2016

9 Mar 2007 Scapegoat

18 Feb 2011 End Racial Preferences Now

29 Aug 2014 An Honest Conversation on Race