creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Lenore Skenazy
Lenore Skenazy
9 Feb 2012
Looking Closely at the Wal-Mart Kidnap Video

By now, you probably have seen the shocking video of 7-year-old Brittney Baxter fighting off a would-be … Read More.

2 Feb 2012
Living in the Sprawl

My dad had a furniture store called "Suburbia." He opened it back when that name conjured up all … Read More.

26 Jan 2012
(Extremely Random) Thoughts on the Oscars

The Oscar nominees have been announced, and if you're like me, you're very excited! ...Because you saw one of them.… Read More.

The Joy of Snobbery

Share Comment

Shallow, snobby morons have more fun.

But you knew that already.

Now proof of this annoying fact comes from Stanford's Graduate School of Business, where professor Baba Shiv decided to study the effects of price on pleasure: If something costs more, does it actually make one happier? (And if it does, why is my idea of heaven a giant dollar store?)

Shiv and his co-author from the California Institute of Technology already knew, of course, that price affects perception. A $30 shirt just does not have the same panache as a $300 one. (Or back to me, a $3 shirt with just a slight irregularity. Woo-hoo! Love it.)

Anyway, what Shiv wanted to know was, "Is it possible that price could impact the actual pleasure that the brain experiences?" To find out, he invited 20 (very eager) participants to come taste an array of wines. Actually, it was just three wines, but they were presented as if there were a whole bunch of different ones, ranging in price from $5 to $90 a bottle.

The participants sat with their heads in a special kind of MRI machine, and just before each sample was squirted into their mouths, they were told, "This is from the $45 bottle," or, "This is from the $10 bottle" — whatever. Squirt.

The part of the brain that registers taste was not affected by the prices at all. But the pleasure center? The more the wine "cost" the more it lit up like a Christmas tree. If it were sitting next to you at a restaurant, it would lift its glass and declare, "Superb!"

Which, of course, is what happens all the time at restaurants, making the rest of us roll our eyes and wonder, "Does that guy really detect a hint of oak, or is he just full of it?"

Now it turns out: It doesn't matter.

Either way, he's thrilled.

Of course, Shiv hastened to explain that these were not wine connoisseurs in his experiment. In fact, it may have been their ignorance that made them so much happier when they thought they were drinking something special. "Whenever people are less confident in their own ability to judge quality, they tend to rely more on price," said James Kellaris, a marketing professor at the University of Cincinnati. This holds true whether they're trying to judge cars, house paint or liquor.

The only problem is that, often enough, price really doesn't correlate with quality. (Just ask a dollar-store vet.)

(Or maybe don't.)

"In every single article in Consumer Reports, the surprise ending is that the most expensive item is not necessarily the highest in quality or delivers the most satisfaction," Kellaris said.

What the über-rational Consumer Reports has yet to realize, I guess, is that even if something expensive happens to be a piece of garbage (or a glass of rotgut), it still can deliver huge heaps of satisfaction simply because it costs a lot, or at least is something your friends don't have.

That's why snobbery — the joy of lording something over someone else — is not going to go away anytime soon. Look how the experiment participants rejoiced at the neuron level just knowing they were drinking something most people couldn't afford.

Amazing how easy it is to make us happy.

Annoying how much easier it is if you're a shallow, snobby moron.

(Or live near a dollar store.)

Lenore Skenazy is a columnist at The New York Sun and Advertising Age. To find out more about Lenore Skenazy (lskenazy@yahoo.com) and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
You write this article as if you are the first person to realize it, and that this is a new trend in society and before people were all humble farmer's. Sure there were no Kings of rank, and they had no servants and lived and ate the finer things in life, of course the counts and noble men and the high society back in the day is only an imagination. Maybe in your eye, but this is life and what you write is people, as long as people have the drive for something better life will go on as you write. Although, you don't have to live that way and you don't have to live for the finer things that is a choice. By the way, I was raised to think as an independant person but my mother would never think living me alone on a subway is going to make me some how tougher in life.. What were you thinking seriously? Are you so desperate to prove other's wrong, that you would risk your child? Be a parent, don't ever turn your child into your study, he deserves better..
Comment: #1
Posted by: Maggie
Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:26 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Lenore Skenazy
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

13 Nov 2008 Do We Really Need a Mom-in-Chief?

16 Jun 2011 Now We Need Instruction in What?!

9 Dec 2010 Are Kids Too Clean for Their Own Good?