Opinion> Lenore Skenazy> Slacking Hillary

	19 Nov 2009 Wham, Bam, No Thank You, Mammogram It does not come as any kind of surprise that right on the heels of a federal advisory panel's recommending … Read More.
	12 Nov 2009 Parents, Back Off Now here's a strange case. An eighth-grade science teacher in Kansas has been fired for creating a … Read More.
	5 Nov 2009 Ship of Fools NEW YORK — A goliath of gray, huge beyond human proportions, the USS New York sits in the Hudson River, … Read More.

Slacking Hillary

Legs.

A campaign needs them. A pantsuit hides them. Might Hillary Clinton be giving a very different speech Saturday if only she never packed that first fatal slacks-and-jacket ensemble?

In other words, if only Yves Saint Laurent hadn't come along and changed the way powerful women dress?

After all, until Saint Laurent, who died Sunday, sprang onto the fashion scene, the only women who wore pants were the ones riding horses, planting bulbs, or busy being Marlene Dietrich.

Marlene wore trousers and a top hat and wrapped men around her little finger — even if she was more interested in women. Voracious, German, Angelina without the baby bump, she was supposedly Saint Laurent's inspiration.

And you wonder why Hillary's stump outfit makes men cross their legs.

Saint Laurent unveiled his pantsuit in 1966 — the very era Hillary came of age. For a lot of us who remember those days (if only faintly because we're younger!), the suit represented more than just another outfit option. It represented equality.

Until I was in third grade, girls at my public school were required to wear skirts or dresses. In Chicago. In the winter. Fashion historian Nancy Deihl recalls that as late as 1971, when she was in sixth grade, "(she) got sent home for wearing pants under (her) dress because it was really cold."

To us, the personal was pant-litical. Until we got to wear pants, we were second-class citizens, with goose bumps. That's why, to this day, the pantsuit equals something we love: feminism. But to a lot of others, the pantsuit represents something they loathe.

Feminism.

Of course, they never would admit it, but that's what's going on. The pantsuit is, if nothing else, a Rorschach test. The ones who find it "ugly" or "unappealing" have all sorts of totally contradictory reasons.

"Have you ever seen Sarah Jessica Parker in one?" the co-author of "The Art and Power of Being a Lady," Dini von Mueffling, asked.

To her, the pantsuit is what women wear when they don't want to shine — pathos on parade.

But for others, it's more nefarious. "Camouflage," as one blogger asserted. He assumes Clinton wears her pantsuits to hide her chunky legs. In fact, mention "Hillary" and "pantsuit," and there is so much talk about her legs she might as well be campaigning in hot pants.

Still others think she's wearing the suits to blend in with the men running for president. Like that's really likely: "I'm voting for the guy who's married to Bill. Wha … she's a woman ?"

"The concern with pants is really deeply embedded in our society," said women's studies professor Kathleen Lawrence. When people ponder Clinton's pantsuit penchant (and they do), "I think they see it as her rejection of the alternative" — a skirt or dress — Lawrence said. That way, they end up thinking she's not only ideological but also completely inflexible.

That inflexibility (like most inflexibility) is what ended up making Hillary the butt of so many jokes. Google "pantsuit" and "Clinton," and you get 376,000 hits — about half of them from David Letterman.

When she was riding high last summer, Hillary went on his show and declared, ha-ha, campaign promise No. 1: "One more pantsuit joke and Letterman disappears."

But just a few days ago, she was back, humbly offering the top 10 things she loves about America. No. 8: "Thanks to the Internet, I can order new pantsuits 24/7. There's your pantsuit joke, Dave. Are you happy now?"

Of course he is. He's got her defining herself on his terms, as a lady bent on making herself look ridiculous. "To raise money, Hillary entered a wet pantsuit competition," he chuckled the other day.

To women — and men — who appreciate the freedom Saint Laurent bequeathed us, the Hillary-pantsuit debate is a reminder that women may wear pants today, but plain old chauvinism still has legs.

Lenore Skenazy is a columnist at The New York Sun and Advertising Age. To find out more about Lenore Skenazy (lskenazy@yahoo.com) and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.