creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Lenore Skenazy
Lenore Skenazy
24 May 2012
The New Nanny Norm?

Our beloved nanny who worked for us for five years — Joan — called to say she's on the job market again.… Read More.

17 May 2012
Examining Jewish Doctors

The middle-aged lady is running frantically down the beach, waving her arms at the lifeguard: "Help, help!… Read More.

10 May 2012
The Slippery Slope of Parental Advice

At the risk of reading a lot — and I mean a LOT — into one cautionary little tale, today we … Read More.

Parents, Perfection and Prison

Share Comment

Are you perfect — and lucky? Great. Then maybe, just maybe, you will be allowed to raise your kids. Anything less and I'm afraid you may not legally qualify.

That's because we live in a finger-pointing culture ever ready to criminalize normal parents if they are unlucky enough to meet up with fate. That is: If a tragedy befalls their kids, society doesn't pity. It blames.

You may recall the recent story of Raquel Nelson, an Atlanta mom who got off the bus with her three kids alongside a highway after 90 minutes of riding and waiting. Their house was just across the street, so they scampered to the highway median, as did all the other folks getting off at that stop, because the closest traffic light was about a half-mile walk away. From the median, one of the children wriggled away and was struck dead by a drunken driver. Who was charged with criminal manslaughter?

Hint: Not the drinker.

Nelson was facing three years in prison, but eventually public outcry persuaded the judge to give her 40 hours of public service instead. A new trial also was offered. No sooner had that injustice been addressed, however, than up sprang a new one.

The current heart-lurching case involves a New Jersey woman named Felicia Tucker. She is being charged in the drowning death of her toddler nephew Joshua because he got out of the house Tucker shares with her sister and she didn't realize it until too late. He drowned in a nearby lake.

Now, this is not a woman who laughs in the face of child danger. According to a series of articles in the Courier-Post, Tucker and her sister had been devastated by the death of a co-worker's toddler son, who drowned in a pool in June — so devastated that the sisters immediately took every precaution against their own kids drowning at home.

They emptied the kiddie pool. They were rabid about making sure the doors were always latched. They closed the fence that leads down to the nearby lake.

Yet somehow, Joshua, 2 1/2, got himself out the door and down to the lake.

What was tormenting Tucker afterward was whether her nephew suddenly had learned to open the front door or whether somehow it had not been latched. But to the justice system, that should not matter. Something just went horribly, tragically, unpredictably wrong, as things sometimes do.

So a note to police, prosecutors, judges: This is hardly a woman who was negligent. The events that transpired were horrible, yes, but human — not criminal. Pretending otherwise might make you feel smug or safe or superior. But anyone who has ever been a parent — or an elder sibling or a baby sitter — can tell you that life with children is more random than any of us would wish. You can be a caring, conscientious parent and it could happen to you. How would sending this woman — a mom herself — to 10 years in prison make anyone safer or rectify anything?

That's an easy question; it won't. It'll just teach us all a lesson: Unless we are absolutely perfect and live in a perfect world, we'd better just be darn lucky.

Lenore Skenazy is the author of "Free-Range Kids: How to Raise Safe, Self-Reliant Children (Without Going Nuts with Worry)" and "Who's the Blonde That Married What's-His-Name? The Ultimate Tip-of-the-Tongue Test of Everything You Know You Know — But Can't Remember Right Now." To find out more about Lenore Skenazy (lskenazy@yahoo.com) and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Charges like these will continue, because the "criminal" parents are female and not male. You will very seldom see a man charged with negligence when it comes to child care, even if the negligence is real.

It's fashionable to believe that women (that is, anyone with two X chromosomes) are supposed to be omniscient mind readers who can predict the future and hypnotically force their children to do what they want 24x7. This belief has no basis in science or biology. In fact it's an impossible ideal. But publicly scapegoating and punishing a few women for failing to live up to this ideal gives everybody else a false sense of security. Also, other women know they're on the hot seat and become hyper-vigilant.

Amusingly, we never use the same standard on men. If a man is present at, say, a violent robbery, we don't charge him with being an accessory to the crime because he is unable to stop it from happening.
Comment: #1
Posted by: R.A.
Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:53 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Lenore Skenazy
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

7 May 2009 What Do Moms Really Want? A Chance To Be Imperfect

21 Oct 2010 The Scariest Thing About Halloween

23 Jul 2009 Hey, White House Honchos: Your Country Needs You More Than Your Kids