creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence Kudlow
22 Nov 2014
What about the Brainiacs?

Is this immigration game really worth the candle? I think not. And I say this as someone who is an … Read More.

15 Nov 2014
Marriage Is Pro-Growth

The greatest economic challenge of our time is how to restore economic growth. Over the past dozen years, … Read More.

8 Nov 2014
For 2016, Hillary Had the Worst Night

We all know the Republican midterm landslide was largely a repudiation of President Obama's policies and his … Read More.

Time for a Choice -- Not an Echo

Comment

Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell is absolutely right to warn against Obama's gigantic stimulus-spending package. McConnell says it "will be the largest spending bill in the history of our country at a time when our national debt is already the largest in history." As a result, he says the bill "will require tough scrutiny and oversight."

According to McConnell, scrutiny should include this simple test: "Will the yet unwritten, reportedly trillion-dollar spending bill really create jobs and grow the economy — or will it simply create more government spending, more bureaucrats and deeper deficits?"

The Republican leader is drawing a clear line in the sand. OK, good. But the GOP has got to do more. It must start talking about tax cuts to grow the economy. And it must get back to the supply-side by talking about lower marginal tax rates on individuals, businesses and investors.

We don't need bailout nation. Nor do we need the government picking winners and losers in a massive Keynesian new-New Deal spending extravaganza. And it's not Obama's middle-class tax cut that's going to get us out of this economic jam. At best, his vision is incomplete. But at worst, his aversion to successful earners and investors is a real obstacle to full economic recovery.

Social historian and early supply-side activist Irving Kristol taught us three decades ago that the top earners are the economic activists. They're the ones with the highest propensity to consume and invest. They're the ones who buy the yachts, which are built by blue-collar workers. And they're the ones who run the small businesses and provide the capital for the new entrepreneurial start-ups that are the lifeblood of the economy. It is they who energize free-market capitalism.

If we had an economy without rich people, we wouldn't have much of an economy. That's why lower tax rates to reward the economic activists — the most prominent capitalists — are so essential.

In fact, the GOP has a great opportunity to challenge Obama's Keynesian pump-priming by insisting there be a major tax-cut component in any new fiscal package. Republicans shouldn't merely push for somewhat less government spending. They have to make a bold case that tax rates matter for economic growth and job creation.

They must insist that any recovery package includes this key element. Shift the debate. Say clearly that a re-energized economy cannot occur without lower marginal tax rates.

In particular, the GOP position should include lower tax rates on large and small businesses. Right now, the top federal tax rate for C-corps is 35 percent. Small businesses, which pay the individual rate, also are taxed at 35 percent. These rates should be 20 percent for both C-corps and S-corps (including LLCs).

This would make a huge difference. It would be a boon for our global competitiveness, since companies in the United States (as well as Japan) are taxed way above the rates of other advanced countries. It also would attract job-creating investment flows to the United States at a time when capital is on strike in our financial markets and economy. And while businesses collect corporate taxes, it's really consumers who pay the final cost.

Republicans also could promote a middle-class tax cut that would reduce the 28 percent and 25 percent brackets down to 15 percent. And of course, the GOP should work hard to maintain the Bush tax cuts on capital gains, dividends, inheritance and top individual rates.

Senior Obama advisor David Axelrod recently told the Sunday talk-show hosts that the Bush tax-cut package of 2003 is "something we plainly can't afford moving forward." Well, in static terms, the sum-total of the 2003 tax cuts comes to somewhere between $25 billion and $40 billion. Compare that to a trillion-dollar spending plan.

In fact, lower capital-gains tax rates will raise revenues, since this is the single most sensitive tax on the Laffer curve. Indeed, many economists — including Alan Reynolds at the Cato Institute — argue that the growth and simplification effects of reducing the corporate tax rate would be revenue positive.

But the congressional Republicans have to step up to the plate right now. Me-too-ism on spending is a big mistake in both political and economic terms. Instead, the GOP should argue that fiscal policy needs a choice — not an echo (to paraphrase the late conservative stalwart Barry Goldwater).

The whole debate in Washington is heavily skewed toward government spending on infrastructure. It's all spending and virtually no tax cuts. For a more balanced and effective recovery policy, the GOP has to bolster its argument for spending discipline with a loud case for tax cuts.

It truly is time for a choice, not an echo.

To find out more about Lawrence Kudlow and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;.... No matter how much some people have, the hubris of asking for more never crosses their minds... You have a mind, and I thank you for not using it... Don't you bother to consider the possibility that something like wealth and money loses all value, which is to say: its meaning; when one little class has all of it... You folks don't want to pay the taxes that defend your wealth...You just think it happens... It does not just happen... But the point is; there is your government getting ready to throw a bunch of funny money at a specific problem: that the rich took too much too fast out of society, and turned what might be an infinite game into a finite game, and you object... Tell me...What is the value of a queen compared to a pawn with the game over??? The government is trying to edge the economy out of checkmate, and back into stalemate; and doing so with the best of minds urging it; and there is Mitch Mconnell and Larry Kudlow saying over our dead bodies on the power of their little hat racks... Let me tell you why I stand with you on this.... What Jefferson said about suffering evils while they are sufferable, is true today, and always true... Only one thing in this entire world allows people to change their forms -WHEN conservatism; the desire, above all else, to hang onto the known rather than dare the unknown, -still controls them, and it is this: the form must fail... Society has to work, and it has to work for enough people, and it has to offer enough people opportunity and hope, and, supply their needs... Now; for a long time, the wealthy have been trading on the hopes and opportunity of the people... Now; it is throwing even their ability to supply their needs into doubt... Certainly the needs of people for housing and jobs is threatened... The false need for credit has been building around supplying these basic needs; and now, supporting wealth, and saving credit is ruining the value of the money... You have had your day... You have seen high profits born on the back of less service, and higher costs, for workers... You have seen capital on life supports, and seen crisis used as an excuse to feed money to the rich... As a revolutionary, I want nothing better than for you to speak with a microphone, and to sell your nonsense far and wide... Revolution is no ones first choice... You must see this government supporting this economy fail and fall before revolution has a chance... I am rooting for you man... You make my dreams possible...Keep using your voice for nonsense, and keep on using your head to keep your ears apart....Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sun Jan 4, 2009 7:24 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Lawrence Kudlow
Nov. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 1 Dec 2014
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 29 Nov 2014
Newspaper ContributorsUpdated 28 Nov 2014

19 Jun 2010 BP, the White House and Congress Are All Dirty

15 Mar 2007 Any Hedgehogs Running for President?

8 Feb 2008 Bernanke's Next Challenge