creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence Kudlow
18 Oct 2014
Lower Oil Prices Are Unambiguously Good

Steep stock market corrections often create shrouds of pessimism that do bad things to people's brainpower. … Read More.

11 Oct 2014
How about a Little Optimism?

So President Obama gives a major economics speech toward the end of last week, and the next week stocks get clobbered.… Read More.

2 Oct 2014
None Can Call It Treason

A couple of weeks ago at New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art, several hundred people went to their feet to … Read More.

Paulson's Courageous Action

Comment

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is the man of the hour. This weekend he drew a clear line in the sand: no more federal bailouts. Not for Lehman Brothers. Not for global insurer AIG. Not for Merrill Lynch. Not for anyone, at least as of this writing.

It was a gutsy decision for the former Wall Street bigwig. Paulson came to Washington two years ago thinking he could reform Social Security and perhaps the tax system, as well. In the process, he hoped to clean up the federal budget books, maintain an open trading system, and persuade China to take on a more flexible currency and reform its own banking system. But history can be a cruel master, and Paulson's agenda was completely altered by one of the worst financial crises in American history.

Last March, acting in conjunction with Fed head Ben Bernanke, Paulson safeguarded the banking system and the whole global financial structure by backstopping a JPMorgan Chase deal to acquire the ailing Bear Stearns with $29 billion in loan guarantees. The action succeeded in stabilizing markets, but it put U.S. taxpayers on the hook big-time.

Then last week Paulson stepped into the breach again by backstopping mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. It was a necessary action. It prevented a global money meltdown. But it raised the stakes for taxpayers once more.

So this time around, as the Lehman stock headed for zero, Paulson said enough is enough.

Paulson's view — supported by Bernanke and former Clinton Treasury official Timothy Geithner (now the president of the New York Fed) — is that the private sector has to take responsibility, including a consortium of private bank funds, to assist the beleaguered AIG insurance company. We are now in for some Schumpeterian gales of creative destruction. But this is how it must be.

"Moral hazard," said Paulson, "is something I don't take lightly." He's saying bad financial behavior must be penalized, not rewarded. That's the essence of the issue. The risk of failure is essential to an efficient economic system, and that includes financial risk.

In our capitalist system there are losers as well as winners. There are failures as well as successes. Harking back to the eminent economist Joseph Schumpeter, the old failures will be replaced by new enterprises.

The alternative, of course, is that the United States goes down the old European path of government domination of markets and the economy.

But the moment the United States becomes a bailout nation, that is the moment our economy and country head irrevocably down the road of decline. However, Paulson set down a marker and said, "No we won't." As difficult as the next days may be, the primacy of economic freedom has been given a boost, while the economic future of the United States looks brighter. Paulson's decision was both momentous and transformative.

Obama is on the campaign trail predictably charging that a lack of regulations during the Bush era is responsible for the current mess. But he's misreading history. As George Mason economist Tyler Cowen wrote in The New York Times, one of the problems with the U.S. financial system is not a lack of regulation, but a lack of smart and effective regulation.

During the Bush years, financial regulations increased exponentially, beginning with the misbegotten Sarbanes-Oxley act. That put accountants and lawyers in the driver's seat rather than entrepreneurs. And it turns out that neither the Fed, the FDIC, the comptroller of the currency, nor the SEC properly supervised high-risk leveraged borrowings and the capital-adequacy ratios necessary to safeguard against losses. Accounting standards need reform, especially the notion of fair value. Economist David Malpass wants to throw out mark-to-market altogether. He has a good point.

Then there's Congress, led by Democrats in the last two years and Republicans before that, that mandated substandard lending to low-income groups. And as the high-risk loans mounted, this very same Congress — under the gun of political contributions — continued to promote the excesses of lenders, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

There are many more issues wound up in all this. But one thing's for sure. Keeping tax rates low, holding back cheap-money inflation, strengthening the dollar and building a more effective regulatory structure that does not stifle free enterprise is what will promote long-run economic prosperity. For optimists like myself, the plunge in oil and gas pump prices is already producing a sizable tax-cut effect, planting the seeds of recovery for mortgage-holding consumers and everyone else.

It's easy to be overly pessimistic right now. But that negativism is not written in stone. Paulson talks about a housing and financial recovery in terms of months, not years. And I think he's right. But his courageous action to put a stop to bailout fever will do as much as anything to move the nation toward recovery.

To find out more about Lawrence Kudlow and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir; What courage does it take to steal the people's money to give to the rich when the people cannot resist you? How is it that it is our economy when it is failing, but their profits when it is doing well? Henry VII was not well educated by todays standards, but he knew how to stay out of fruitless wars, and build his industry and economy out of the ground. If all we can do is deficite spend directly into the vaults of our billionairs, what is the peoint? If it is because of you folks that the country can't piss away its capital fast enough in foreign markets, and have been trading on the speculation value of property for years, then where is the economy in your economy? Is it all just what ever you want to do when you want to do it, no government, no laws, no regulations? I think it is nonsense, and I do not support given any of you a dime to keep you in business. I don't care how many pyramid schemes you come up with. I don't care if you can convince the population that you can squeeze gold out of a penny. I am not buying any of it. Let it all fall down and we can pick up the pieces easier than we can prop them up. You know the economy is supposed to support the government. When is that ever going to happen?.... Thanks.... Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:17 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Lawrence Kudlow
Oct. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Ray Hanania
Ray HananiaUpdated 23 Oct 2014
Matt Towery
Matt ToweryUpdated 23 Oct 2014
R. Emmett Tyrrell
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr.Updated 23 Oct 2014

27 Nov 2008 Obama's Pro-Growth Economic Team?

28 Aug 2008 Only Obama Can Make the Sale

11 Feb 2012 A King Dollar GOP?