creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence Kudlow
16 Feb 2012
Obama's Class-Warfare, Tax-the-Rich Budget

If you shake out the Obama budget in terms of bold headlines, it's really a class-warfare, tax-the-rich budget.… Read More.

11 Feb 2012
A King Dollar GOP?

Out on the campaign trail, Fed head Ben Bernanke is an unpopular guy. Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich have both … Read More.

28 Jan 2012
Obama's Lowball Vision: Tax Success and Growth

You would think that with one of the weakest economic recoveries on record, President Barack Obama would be … Read More.

McCain Talks Straight on Fan-Fred Reform

Share Comment

There will be no more business as usual for housing lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac if John McCain is elected president. That's McCain's clear message in a recent hard-hitting op-ed in the St. Petersburg Times and in various straight-talk media interviews.

Politically powerful Fannie and Freddie may be popping champagne corks in Washington, where a congressional bailout package provides full government backing for their outsized management pay packages, massive political-contribution and lobbying practices, and private portfolio hedge-fund activities. These government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) got just what they wanted, and they now have the power to pay more dividends to their shareholders without any caps on compensation.

But Big Mac is gonna put an end to this if he's elected come November.

"Americans should be outraged at the latest sweetheart deal in Washington," writes McCain. "Congress will put U.S. taxpayers on the hook for potentially hundreds of billions of dollars to bail out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. It's a tribute to what these two institutions — which most Americans have never heard of — have bought with more than $170-million worth of lobbyists in the past decade."

Fannie and Freddie represent the worst of Washington's bailout fever. Using government power for private profit is how Wall Street Journal editor Paul Gigot puts it. Privatizing gains while socializing losses is the complaint registered by former House Majority Leader Dick Armey. Government semi-socialism is how I see it.

The GSEs spread political vigorish in turn for more power and more privilege. Just this year alone, their portfolio caps were raised twice while their capital reserve requirements were lowered. And now, with an explicit government guarantee, unlimited credit lines and the possibility of federal stock purchases, they'll be GSEs on steroids. All this in the name of helping housing, the most favored political sector in the American economy.

Budget assistance for homebuyers is already staggering. The Housing and Urban Development Department spends $52 billion a year. The home mortgage interest deduction is worth about $80 billion yearly. A capital-gains exclusion is estimated at $29 billion. And the local property-tax deduction comes to roughly $14 billion. That's a total of $175 billion in annual assistance to the housing sector.

And that's before we get to the Fannie-Freddie bailout.

Some people talk about a so-called Marshall Plan to spur American energy independence. But for years we've had a Marshall Plan for housing. It's enough already. There are other economic sectors worthy of investment.

John McCain has taken a strong reform position here, and he's totally right. This is McCain at his very best. He argues that Fannie and Freddie employees manipulated financial reports to line the pockets of senior executives. He calls the GSEs a danger to financial markets. And he says if one dime of taxpayer money ends up in those institutions, "the management and the board should immediately be replaced, multimillion dollar salaries should be cut, and bonuses and other compensation should be eliminated. They should cease all lobbying activities and drop all payments to outside lobbyists."

He also argues for strong regulation of Fan and Fred "that limits their ability to borrow, shrinks their size until they are no longer a threat to our economy, and privatizes and eliminates their links to the government."

McCain economic advisor Steve Forbes wants to break up Fannie and Freddie into 10 or 12 companies, completely severing their ties to the government. With these private companies competing in the mortgage market, Forbes says the entire housing sector will be revived, with taxpayers off the hook for a change.

On the other hand, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is putting his reform hopes on new Fannie-Freddie regulator James Lockhart, who runs the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight. Lockhart is a reformist skeptic of Fannie and Freddie. But his term would only last until year-end. After that, his successor will be subject to Senate confirmation and a public grilling from the two banking committees, all while Fan and Fred pour money into the campaign coffers of the Democrats and Republicans serving on those committees.

Does this sound like true reform? Highly doubtful. In fact, the bailout bill should be completely rewritten to stipulate the kind of privatization program outlined by McCain.

Former Reagan Treasury official Peter Wallison has warned for years that Fannie and Freddie would blow up financial markets. Well, we just witnessed the blow-up. But now we should also blow up the Fannie-Freddie bailout. It's not real reform.

Obama won't do it. He says there must be an essential role for Fan and Fred. And Obama advisor Franklin Raines — the former Fannie Mae CEO who was forced to resign over accounting scandals — argues for the status quo. But McCain is talking real reform. Bravo for the Arizonan. He's the real candidate of change.

To find out more about Lawrence Kudlow and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Mr. Kudlow tangles two threads that should be kept separate. The dollars from the national treasury that get syphoned off into Fannie and Freddie are distinct from the deductions allowed private citizens to encourage the purchase of a primary residence, and to help secure a nest egg as a homeowner moves into retirement. There may be more threads tangled within the deductions, as well. <> The property tax deduction is an example of the Federal Government appropriately yielding "first dibs" to local government. There's a similar deduction for income taxes paid to a city, county, or state government. Some of us remember when sales taxes paid to local governments were similarly deductable. <> For many citizens, the purchase of a primary residence represents the first major step toward building the nest egg that will provide financial security in retirement. It serves the collective interests of the nation to have people take this step. Providing federal tax relief by making the interest paid on a mortgage for a primary residence deductable from income is a wonderfully inexpensive and efficient means of encouraging private citizens to make decisions for their own benefit, that also benefit the country: it's win-win. <> To allow a certain amount of profit on a life-time of home ownership to "go through untaxed" as a homeowner approaches retirement is also a benefit to the nation. It encourages middle class homeowners to downsize after age 54, giving them an opportunity to reduce their living expenses, without penalizing them for purchasing lower cost housing, or choosing to rent. <> The federal government already has its hands too deeply into taxpayers pockets. It behooves us to avoid mischaracterizing a few beneficial policies, lest someone get the idea they should be called "loopholes" and work to have them eliminated.
Comment: #1
Posted by: davd w pennington
Fri Aug 1, 2008 8:21 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Lawrence Kudlow
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 19 Feb 2012

28 Jun 2007 Washington's "War Against Winners"

1 Dec 2007 Three More Years of Goldilocks?

10 Aug 2011 Bernanke to the Rescue