opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Larry Elder
Larry Elder
4 Feb 2016
Donald Trump: Clueless About Free Trade

One of Donald Trump's talking points and biggest applause lines is how "they" — Japan, China and Mexico &#… Read More.

28 Jan 2016
#OscarsSoWhite -- Biggest Fraud Since 'Hands Up, Don't Shoot'

First, the facts. Since 2000, 10 percent of Oscar nominations have gone to black actors. Blacks comprise 13 … Read More.

21 Jan 2016
Notes From the Democrats' Debate

Fighting off the temptation to fall asleep during the most recent Democratic — and Donald Trump-less &#… Read More.

Obama Asks Thug Nations To Judge America


Does America engage in massive and widespread violations of human rights?

The Obama administration thinks so. That's the takeaway of the "Report of the United States of America Submitted to the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights." The introduction says it "gives a partial snapshot of the current human rights situation in the United States, including some of the areas where problems persist in our society."

What human rights problems?

One is the higher unemployment rate for blacks (15.8 percent) and Hispanics (12.4 percent) compared with that of whites (8.8 percent).

Unemployment is directly related to education. Blacks and Hispanics drop out of high school at a higher rate than whites. Some Asian-American groups, on the other hand, have unemployment rates similar to that of whites.

Low unemployment among these Asian-American groups results from high-school graduation rates that exceed those of whites. Comparing students at the same socio-economic level, Asians outperform whites, blacks and Hispanics on standardized tests. Government neglect is not the culprit. Cities with large black and Hispanic populations — such as New York, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and Chicago — spend more per student than do cities in Utah and Iowa, yet they do worse on standardized tests.

This is not good. But what has this to do with human rights?

Another "human rights" problem is the existence of "don't ask, don't tell" and the Defense of Marriage Act, which allows states to reject gay marriage. Until recently, former Secretary of State and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin Powell defended DADT, and he urged former President Bill Clinton to back away from his promise to allow gays to serve openly in the military. President Barack Obama publicly opposes gay marriage. However one feels about gays in the military or gay marriage, these are policy and value issues where reasonable people can disagree — not matters of human rights.

Another so-called human rights problem is that of "sentencing disparities between powder cocaine and crack cocaine offenses (because) those convicted of crack cocaine offenses are more likely to be members of a racial minority."

The stiff sentences for crack resulted from demands by Jesse Jackson and the Congressional Black Caucus for Congress to do something about the inner-city crack trade and its attendant violence. Congress acted.

When blacks got busted at higher rates than whites, this suddenly became a human rights issue.

Another human rights problem is unequal homeownership rates between whites and blacks and Hispanics, irrespective of creditworthiness or whether the ownership of a home is necessarily a good idea.

The report even mentioned Arizona's SB 1070, which the attorney general has called racial profiling.

President George W. Bush refused to join the U.N. Human Rights Council, a position immediately reversed by Obama. When council members include countries like Saudi Arabia, Libya, Cuba and China, isn't the entire exercise a sick joke?

In Saudi Arabia, a Lebanese man was arrested while on a religious pilgrimage to Mecca and Medina. A Saudi court sentenced him late last year for practicing "witchcraft" — making predictions about the future — on his own Lebanese TV show. The punishment? Death by beheading. Libyans rejoiced over the return of the only terrorist convicted for the Pan Am Flight 103 bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland, which killed 270 people, most of them Americans. In Cuba, journalists are routinely thrown in jail, their number and condition unknowable because of the repressive state-run media. No one knows the true number of dissidents killed during China's Tiananmen Square protests in 1989, but the number may exceed 3,000. Political dissidents remain behind bars in China, and the country continues its "one-child" policy with penalties for noncompliance that include forced sterilization.

The report's introduction says: "Some may say that by participating we acknowledge commonality with states that systematically abuse human rights. We do not. There is no comparison between American democracy and repressive regimes." Well, that's nice to know.

Obama's report is a left-wing indictment of America. Left-wing policy goals are called human rights. And left-wing legislation signed by Obama is touted as an advancement of human rights.

That totalitarian regimes like Saudi Arabia, Libya, Cuba and China serve on any human rights council — and pass judgment on how America treats its citizens — is a vulgarity.

Obama's view of America — and his message to the world — is that we are deeply flawed and have much to apologize for, even to thug countries that equate terrorism with freedom fighting. And by touting his left-wing policy goals as human rights imperatives, Obama arrogantly equates leftism with cosmic justice.

Why not simply take our chances with Judge Judy?

Larry Elder is a syndicated radio talk show host and best-selling author. His latest book, "What's Race Got to Do with It?" is available now. To find out more about Larry Elder, visit his Web page at To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at




4 Comments | Post Comment
All I can add to that is... AMEN!!!
Comment: #1
Posted by: wayne
Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:12 PM
I'm so sick of this junior high school mentality amongst supposedly grown men - "In Saudi Arabia" they did this and that, "In Cuba"....blah blah blah. How about focusing on what your own values and standards are rather than saying 'look what they do over there, see it makes it okay what we do' None of this stuff is okay or good or right. This is the mentality of a little child that thinks well he kicked my sandcastle in so it's okay if I kick his sandcastle to bits. Please GROW UP finally Mr. Elder! Develop your own values and virtues separate from what all the other little boys are doing - this is maturity my friend. The US - and many other countries - have been violating human rights in a serious manner for decades - decades! What is a 'thug nation' anyway, sounds like something out of a comic book! Try and develop your own values and live behind them please, before it is too late. We are rapidly approaching an era where mature leadership (and journalism) are essential. We are plagued with a group of primarily men at the top, in important influential positions - like yours - that never ever were confronted with their childish little fantasies about power, about making too much money, about doing 'what is right' and making the sacrifices in their own lives and professions in order to do the right thing. This is the example we are teaching our children and we wonder how the world got so messed up? Wonder no longer, change yourself, set an example - please before it is too late for our kids.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Bill
Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:57 PM
Wow Bill, talk about a long response that does absolutely nothing to respond to the article. I fail to see in here where it actually directly compares us to anyone else. Maybe I just don't know how to read. The point, I believe, is that it should be useless for us to lay bare our sins to a body that has absolutely no moral authority whatsoever. It is as if I stole a candy bar from a store and then submitted a report to convicted murderers about how bad of a person I was because of it. Nowhere in the article does it say that we do not have issues, this is a given. He merely takes issue with the sins they decided to admit to, and the forum in which they admitted them. And I have absolutely no idea how you jump from your first premise to the broader one about "men at the top" and all this gibberish. It really doesn't make sense to me, but maybe I am a moron. ~TB
Comment: #3
Posted by: T Bigler
Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:44 PM
I agree with you, T Bigler. I can't quite figure out what Bill is using to refute the argument. It sounds like he is an ardent Obama supporter who can't stand for anything negative to be said about the President. That seems to be a common happening among some of his supporters, they rant and rave but can't come up with logical arguments.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Nancy
Sat Sep 18, 2010 9:28 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Larry Elder
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 8 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 6 Feb 2016
diane dimond
Diane DimondUpdated 6 Feb 2016

4 Sep 2008 JFK: Democrats' Role Model?

20 Nov 2014 Jonathan Gruber: Obamacare Architect, Unplugged

27 May 2010 Letting Rand Paul Twist in the Wind