creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Larry Elder
Larry Elder
18 Mar 2010
Obama to America: Bend Over and Cough

Americans resoundingly reject ObamaCare. What, then, accounts for the Democrats' determination? Democrats … Read More.

11 Mar 2010
Republican Collectivism

The most disturbing part of the ObamaCare debate is not about where Republicans and Democrats disagree, but … Read More.

4 Mar 2010
Sen. Bunning: 'Paygo Means Paygo'

What on earth did Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., do, and why did he do it? An astonished ABC reporter followed the … Read More.

Is Capitalism on the Ropes?

An indictment of greed! A case for more government intervention! Worst financial crisis since the Great Depression! Failure of capitalism! This list includes the "lessons" of the recent turmoil in the financial markets. Nonsense.

Down with greed!

Someone please produce the gun held to the temples of borrowers who put little or no money down, took out "teaser" rates, and then pleaded ignorance or victimhood when the lender — as stipulated in the contract — jacked up the rate. Lenders and borrowers expected government/taxpayers to somehow, someway, step in and shield them from the consequences of their decisions. This creates "moral hazard" — behavior based upon the knowledge of protection from the bad consequences of reckless or irresponsible behavior. Decisions entail risk, whether personal or financial ones.

We need more regulation!

We have it — lots of it. Ever hear of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO)? This agency, which employs 200 people, exists for one thing and one thing only — to "oversee" Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the "government-sponsored entities" that own or guarantee 40 percent of the nation's residential mortgages. Mere months before Freddie and Fannie's collapse and subsequent government takeover, OFHEO issued a report that saw only clean sailing. The Community Reinvestment Act, passed in 1977, mandated that lenders lend to high-risk borrowers — or else. The government actually held up prudent bank mergers if one or both sides did not sufficiently "lend" to borrowers who, under normal circumstances, failed to qualify. Why is the federal government in the housing business in the first place? We need less government, not more regulation.

We are experiencing "the greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression"!

Even if this were true, we aren't even close to that catastrophic event. At the Great Depression's nadir, 25 percent of adults were unemployed, including nearly 50 percent of urban black adults. Economist David Wheelock, of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, says that by the dawn of 1934, nearly half the urban homes with mortgages were in default, and 7.3 percent of housing structures had been foreclosed. Today 6.4 percent of mortgages are delinquent, 2.75 percent are in the foreclosure process, and 0.6 percent of all housing units are bank-owned.

But what about since the Great Depression? Take the recession of 1980-81.

In 1980, inflation averaged 13.58 percent, unemployment increased from 6.3 to 8.5 percent, and the prime loan rate reached an astonishing 21.5 percent. According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, today's delinquency rate is only a little higher than in 1985. And in 1999, the foreclosure rate set records.

According to the FDIC, in the almost two-year period of 2007 and 2008, 15 banks failed. Similarly, during Clinton's last two years in office, 1999 and 2000, 15 banks also failed. In the recession-free years of 1988 and 1989, there were 1,004 bank failures. And since the Great Depression, the average number of yearly bank failures has been 94.

This exposes the failure of capitalism!

What do you say we actually try capitalism, where private actors reap rewards and assume the risk? "Capitalism," says Kenneth Minogue, professor emeritus at the London School of Economics, "is what people do if you leave them alone." People want "hands off" until, that is, they want "hands on." People want homes, many preferring that option even when renting may be more prudent. Many want rent control to shield them from leasing at fair market rates. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama promises "world-class" education — with taxpayers paying for it. And the federal government, in dramatic contradiction with the limited-government intention of the Constitution, involves itself in health care, guaranteeing private-sector retirement accounts, disaster relief, welfare, unemployment compensation benefits, retirement benefits, etc.

The Federal Reserve Bank, in effect, prints money to pay for things that voters demand — but their taxes cannot cover. The proposed bailout of financial institutions enables the Fed to create hundreds of billions of dollars out of thin air. The cost is greater inflation — a stealth tax on us all.

Government, meanwhile, grows and grows.

In 1930, before Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal, taxpayers paid about 12 percent of their income to all three levels of government — state, local and federal. Today we pay approximately 40 percent — even more if you attach a value to unfunded mandates, such as those issued by agencies such as OSHA.

So, yes, our recent financial turmoil does suggest failure — a failure to truly practice capitalism and a failure to accept and believe in the value, appropriateness and morality of a limited government and maximum personal responsibility.

Larry Elder is a syndicated radio talk show host and best-selling author. His latest book, "Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card — and Lose," is available now. To find out more about Larry Elder, visit his Web page at www.LarryElder.com. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

CREATORS SYNDICATE COPYRIGHT 2008 LAURENCE A. ELDER



Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment

Need and greed. A volatile combination. My experience is when I went looking for a house at a price that would give me a comfortable mortgage, everyone and I mean everyone, real estate companies, lenders, builders, all wanted me to spend more. "You earn enough to afford a house of this size and a payment of this amount. In fact, you could even get a house THIS size and still meet your obligations". My experience was not extraordinary. The lenders, the entire financial sector, treated their business as a carnival, they were the ringers and the spinmeisters, we were the yokels. They appealed to our need and greed with their own need and greed. With their higher education, specialized knowledge, and let's not forget the specialized "language"that lawyers and bankers use, we yokels tried to make sense of our mortgage and loan contracts, written in a language no lay person can understand. These contracts clearly place all the high cards on the lenders side. They figured they had a win-win. If the yokel can meet his obligation, they win. If the yokel can't, they pocket whatever he paid, then resell it at the inflated housing prices, kaching! Win!!Yokels may not understand all the legalese double speak, but we get it, too. Can't meet the payment, credit ruined, the bank will foreclose, how you going to get a decent rental with bad credit? We comforted ourselves having to walk away from our obligation knowing when we walked into it the cards were stacked against us, especially if we failed. As for the rest of your article, you are the spinmeister and I'd love to know what planet you're on. I'm sure people throughout the globe who are affected by this economic fallout would love for you to explain from your very high perch, how this is their fault and not the fault of the fatcats receiving the big money and fat bonuses paid to them by us to ensure someone was watching the henhouse.

Comment: #1
Posted by: liz
Fri Sep 26, 2008 4:23 PM

Apologies! Contrary to last part of my previous post asking about your planet (which was a cut and paste not meant for you), I absolutely agree with most of your points. My excuse is I keep thinking a bailout...ANOTHER bailout. and so it goes.

Comment: #2
Posted by: liz
Fri Sep 26, 2008 7:38 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:
Creators.com comments policy
More
Larry Elder
Mar. `10
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 21 Mar 2010
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 21 Mar 2010
Connie Schultz icon
Connie SchultzUpdated 21 Mar 2010

31 Jan 2008 Bill Clinton Plays the Race Card -- and Loses

20 Sep 2007 The Media's Spin on Greenspan

17 Apr 2008 Obama: 'Bitterly' Out of Touch