creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Larry Elder
Larry Elder
13 Nov 2014
Obama Is No Clinton

"I don't want to try to read the tea leaves on election results," said President Barack Obama following last Tuesday'… Read More.

6 Nov 2014
Jay Carney to GOP: Your Party Is Racist -- and 'You Know It'

Former Obama White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, now a political commentator for CNN, casually admitted that,… Read More.

30 Oct 2014
PunditFact Lies Again

PunditFact strikes again. For the second time. PunditFact is a so-called truth-seeking column by the Tampa … Read More.

Jonathan Gruber: Obamacare Architect, Unplugged

Comment

Economist Milton Friedman said the promotion of bad policy requires two types of advocates. "Do-gooders," he said, act in good faith but out of ignorance in promoting counterproductive policies. The second type are the "special interest" rent-seekers, those who stand to personally profit from the scheme.

For economist Jonathan Gruber, the primary architect and intellectual godfather of both Romneycare and Obamacare, we need a new category. Gruber is a two-fer — both a do-gooder and a rent-seeker. Gruber, so far, has pocketed $6 million advising the federal and state governments on the very law he helped design.

Massachusetts retained MIT economist Gruber to help design its signature health care measure. President Obama later employed Gruber to do the same thing for Obamacare, which Gruber called a deficit-reducing measure that bends the cost curve down. But it turns out when Gruber lets his hair down, he speaks very differently about the nature and goals of Obamacare. Recently, some rather embarrassing videotapes of Gruber comments have surfaced.

Gruber on cost controls: "Cost control turns out to be very, very hard to do. Probably the single biggest frustration I have with critics of this law are people who say it didn't go far enough. ... We do not solve our cost problem in health care in the U.S. with this legislation. We simply do not, OK? But you know what? That's because it was impossible to do so."

Gruber, in 2012, explaining how Massachusetts pulled off Romneycare: "The dirty secret in Massachusetts is the feds paid for our bill, OK? In Massachusetts we had a very powerful senator you may know named Ted Kennedy. ... Ted Kennedy and smart people in Massachusetts had basically figured out a way to sort of rip off the feds for about 400 million dollars a year."

Gruber, in 2012, admitting that Obamacare was intentionally designed so that only enrollees in state-run exchanges — not the one run by the feds — receive subsides and tax credits (a matter the Supreme Court will soon decide): "I think what's important to remember politically about this, is if you're a state and you don't set up an exchange, that means your citizens don't get their tax credits."

Gruber, in 2013, on voter stupidity: "Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, you know, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever.

... Look, I wish ... that we could make it all transparent, but I'd rather have this law than not. ... Yeah, there are things I wish I could change, but I'd rather have this law than not."

Gruber, in 2012, on Americans' lack of understanding economics: "We just tax the insurance companies. They pass on higher prices that offsets the tax break we get — it ends up being the same thing. It's a very clever, you know, basic exploitation of the lack of economic understanding of the American voter."

Gruber, in 2013, on Democrats' efforts to disguise a direct tax on people who purchase so-called Cadillac plans: "Then another Massachusetts hero, John Kerry ... came up with a great substitute idea. They said ... 'What if we instead just levied a 40 percent tax on the insurance companies that sell these terrible expensive Cadillac plans?' We said, 'Well, that's pretty much the same thing. But why does it matter?' 'You'll see.' And we proposed it, and that passed because the American voters are too stupid to understand the difference."

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in 2009, extolled his credentials: "I don't know if you have seen Jonathan Gruber of MIT's analysis of what the comparison is to the status quo versus what will happen in our bill for those who seek insurance within the exchange."

Then-Sen. Obama, in 2006, bragged about how he stole ideas from Jon Gruber: "You have already drawn some of the brightest minds from academia and policy circles, many of them I've stolen ideas from liberally. People ranging from Robert Gordon to ... Jon Gruber." In 2009, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called Gruber "one of the most respected economists in the world."

Today neither Pelosi nor Obama knows the economist from a fence post. Asked recently about Gruber, Pelosi said, "I don't know who he is." When asked about him, Obama shrugged and reduced Gruber to some guy who "was never on our staff": "The fact that an adviser who was never on our staff expressed an opinion that I completely disagree with in terms of the voters is not a reflection on the actual process that was run." According to Fox News, Gruber visited the Obama White House at least 19 times.

In deciding this key issue about state exchanges, the Supreme Court may throw the Gruber's own words right back at him — and rule Obama's unilateral reinterpretation unlawful. Then even Pelosi will know Gruber's name.

Larry Elder is a best-selling author and radio talk-show host. To find out more about Larry Elder, or become an "Elderado," visit www.LarryElder.com. Follow Larry on Twitter @larryelder. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2014 LAURENCE A. ELDER

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;... Mr. Gruber thinks we are stupid. Mr. Freeman says we act out of ignorance. Do any of those economists hold the American people in High Regard?
I understand the problem as one of lens. Economics is a certain lens, and if an economist could get their focus right they could be the masters of the world. And they don't; so they aren't, and instead of blaming themselves, or their models of reality, they blame the people. You can see people trained in Marxist Materialistic Economics like the long late Armand Hammer, or Rupert Murdock had no trouble getting rich. Only The capitalists lens is out of focus, and their theories are wrong, and we get the blame. Get used to it; and don't think the republicans as a whole or the Democrats are better.
They all have their own ideas about what we should want, and think they know how we should behave. It is like the doctor saying the operation was a success. It is something you need to be alive to hear, and the more these people tinker around the edges of the echogovernment, the more it becomes clear that economy and government are joined at the hip, and both have to be changed in the same operation.
The problem for us is the next step. This republican plant believes the people are stupid. This is but the tip of the iceburg of universal contempt both parties and the government hold for we the people. It could be worse. When things were going rotten in Turkey, some times the people would riot, threaten revolution, and make demands for reform. The Ottoman would offer concessions, make friends with the leaders of the insurrection, and invite them to dinner, to talk, and half way through the soup would have them all strangled. Back to business as usual. Who's next?

When these know it alls say we are stupid, they are from their perspective telling the truth. There is a lot we do not know, but we have reached such a stage of distrust and alienation from our government that the government cannot even do good to us without us feeling it is evil in disquise. A state of dependency where we must wait for government to deliver us some good is not nearly so desirable as one of democracy where we could take the good we need for ourselves. That we should tolerate this situation is an amazement to me. We are only more distrustful of each other, and down right fearful of democracy when it is our one salvation. Many people would accept tyranny if it pledged to support their side of the issue. Faced with the anarchy of the economy, and a government powerless to control the madness that controls it; wouldn't an American Caesar be in order, to lead us in world conquest and empire? No. Better revolution!
To live with this depth of division, with this anarchy in our economy, and our want of control over our government is dangerous in the extreme. To influence government with our periodic votes is like threading a needle with a cane pole. These men may be only a few thousand miles away, but their minds are millions of miles away. They are distracted from their purpose, from our purpose, from the purpose of government, and we need to bring them home to America, and acquaint them with our pain.
Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:12 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Larry Elder
Nov. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Newspaper ContributorsUpdated 24 Nov 2014
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 24 Nov 2014
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 23 Nov 2014

28 May 2009 Pelosi vs. CIA: Why It Matters

20 Dec 2012 Gun Violence -- Let's Shift the Odds in Favor of the Good Guys!

20 Nov 2008 Time To Reassess the Iraq War?