opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Joseph Farah
Joseph Farah
10 Feb 2016
Don't Let Rubio Fool You Twice

My good friend, Rush Limbaugh, is willing to give Marco Rubio grace for possibly making a "mistake" with the … Read More.

3 Feb 2016
Gasp! Have You Seen Trump's Negative Ratings?

There's something new for Donald Trump haters to be excited about. The latest Gallup poll shows the GOP front-… Read More.

27 Jan 2016
Trump and the National Review Irrelevants

The National Review rounded up a couple dozen "conservatives" to denounce Donald Trump and tell the world … Read More.

Wikipedia Lies, Slander Continue


"Joseph Francis Farah is an Evangelical Christian American journalist and noted homosexual of Lebanese and Syrian heritage." — the first line of my bio in Wikipedia

The Internet has brought the world some wonderful sources of information. And it has brought us some perfectly dreadful sources of misinformation.

Wikipedia falls into the latter category. And this column is my latest effort to demonstrate just how abusive this so-called "online collaborative encyclopedia" really is. It is not only a provider of inaccuracy and bias; it is also the wholesale purveyor of lies and slander unlike any other the world has ever known.

(Note: Within an hour of the posting of this column on World Net Daily, Wikipedia pulled the defamatory accusation that Farah is "a noted homosexual" from its bio. Later, most of the bio was pulled. However, the cached version still remains.)

Think about it. Wikipedia boasts 684 million annual visitors. I can't think of too many sources of information that attract that much attention.

And that's really the problem — that too many people looking for easy and cheap sources of information turn to this wholly unreliable website run by political and social activists promoting their own agenda.

This is hardly the first time Wikipedia has slimed me.

A couple years ago, the "editors" there claimed I had an affair with a prominent female syndicated columnist. Now they characterize me as a "noted homosexual." Neither one of these accusations has any basis in truth, of course. But you can see just how confused they are over there: Am I a heterosexual philanderer or am I a noted homosexual?

Which is it? It turns out they're both untrue — as is most of the rest of my bio. And I doubt very much if I am the only victim of this kind of pseudo-journalistic terrorism and character assassination.

Wikipedia claims "anyone" can edit its information. But, in the past, try as I might, the defamations kept coming back. I was even told I was not a reliable source of information about me. Others apparently knew me better, according to the Wikipedia gatekeepers.

I actually had to threaten a libel suit against Wikipedia to get the site to remove the previous attempt at defamation.

It took days of waiting. It took hours of making corrections that were quickly replaced intentionally with the undocumented and undocumentable lies designed to hurt and humiliate.

Am I just bellyaching because I'm a victim?

No. There's a much bigger point to be made here. If ever there were a website to avoid at all costs, it's Wikipedia. No good can possibly come from using this vast wasteland of error and deliberate deceit. You should get off of it and warn others away. You should make sure your children and grandchildren know what a corrupt and morally bankrupt institution it truly is.

How low does Wikipedia go?

— How about intellectually rationalizing displays of child pornography? You can actually join the forum over at Wikipedia where the subject is debated openly, even while an FBI investigation continues.

— Wikipedia has been characterized as an unreliable source by teachers.

— It has been denounced by authors and editors.

— Librarians have deemed it more dangerous than crack cocaine.

— Researchers have pointed out how it is subject to manipulation, especially by government.

But still it is used. Still it is cited. Still it grows like a monster each and every day.

Today I am enlisting you in a dragon-slaying mission. I can't kill this beast alone. But with your help and the help of other people of goodwill and good conscience, we can defang this monstrosity. Help me get the word out.

After all, here's what Wikipedia says about itself: "Because Wikipedia is an ongoing work to which, in principle, anybody can contribute, it differs from a paper-based reference source in important ways. In particular, older articles tend to be more comprehensive and balanced, while newer articles more frequently contain significant misinformation, unencyclopedic content or vandalism. Users need to be aware of this to obtain valid information and avoid misinformation that has been recently added and not yet removed Ö" (emphasis added)

These damning words are found in Wikipedia's own "About Wikipedia" section. I didn't make them. The founder of Wikipedia did as they tried to put the best face on what they do. In other words, Wikipedia, by its own definition, is little more than an electronic graffiti board under the control of high-tech Crips and Bloods.

Joseph Farah's newest book, "None of the Above: Why 2008 Is the Year To Cast the Ultimate Protest Vote," is available now. To find out more about Joseph Farah and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



1 Comments | Post Comment
Dear Mr. Shapiro,
I still have your article posted February 17, 2005, titled Ban baseball steriod users for life. I have been in your corner ever since. I am a 89 yr. oldl traditional Catholic. Would you please consider a;;lying your virtues, principles and talent to the subject -- Tiger Woods. As you probably know, Dan Jenkins wrote a priceless article on Tiger Wools. "Nice, Not, Knowing You."


Bob Lacey
Comment: #1
Posted by: Robert Lacey
Thu May 13, 2010 1:23 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Joseph Farah
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 13 Feb 2016
David Harsanyi
David HarsanyiUpdated 12 Feb 2016
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 12 Feb 2016

27 Jan 2016 Trump and the National Review Irrelevants

7 Nov 2007 Democrats, Kids and Old Folks

11 Nov 2015 Will 2017 be a Jubilee Year?