creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Joseph Farah
Joseph Farah
27 Aug 2014
What's America's No. 1 National Security Threat?

What does a nation do when its highest official represents the biggest security threat it faces? That's what … Read More.

20 Aug 2014
Something for Rand Paul to Think About

I think Sen. Rand Paul has some great ideas. I think it's even possible God has placed him in a unique … Read More.

13 Aug 2014
When Obama Orders Amnesty

Now that House Speaker John Boehner has ruled out impeaching President Barack Obama, what will Republicans do … Read More.

What's Wrong With Socialism?

Comment

Sometimes those of us who have been around for a while take too much for granted.

I tend to assume, for instance, that most Americans understand socialism is an evil, immoral system of economics and government.

But then occasionally, I get a letter from a young American who has been taught throughout his life that only the government can spread wealth fairly or that market economics is inherently corrupt.

I got one of those this week. And I quickly realized why Barack Obama is on the verge of winning the presidency of the United States.

So I guess it's time to get back to basics with an answer to the fundamental question: What's wrong with socialism?

I'd like to begin this economics lesson with a few questions:

—Do you believe in private property?

—How would you feel if someone took yours?

—Where has socialism ever succeeded?

—What does the government do well?

—What does the Bible have to say about economics?

—What did America's Founders have to say about economics?

—Is socialism constitutional?

I won't have time or space to deal with those questions in depth in this essay. However, I find the answers are often good enough to convince well-meaning moral people that socialism is a disaster.

Most people believe in private property, especially their own.

Most people don't like having their things stolen. In fact, it's government's job to protect you from theft, not to be the thief.

Most people are unable to point to a single successful socialist experiment unless they choose some relatively new Western nation with a "mixed economy." Those include Canada and some European countries, such as France. You even could include the U.S. in that category. It's important to recognize that mere survival as a nation over a period of time does not make for a successful experiment. Socialism, for instance, aims to eliminate or reduce poverty. In none of those nations has poverty been eliminated or reduced as a result of socialist experiments.

Most people recognize that government is an inherently inefficient beast. What they might not recognize is that it also poses the greatest threat to freedom. The more power it has the less freedom individual citizens have.

Government is a necessary evil — something that should be tolerated as a limited nuisance, not counted on for basic needs.

Most people don't realize the Bible countenances private property. It holds it up as honorable as long as it does not become a diversion from God and as long as it does not become man's God.

Most people apparently forget what our Founders had to say about property. They forget that our Constitution expressly limits the power of the federal government. You could say constitutionally limited government is the opposite of socialism.

But as Barack Obama would say, those are "just words." And I am afraid mere words will not be enough to persuade anyone to fight against mankind's innate desire to collectivize and rebel against God's order.

So as I predicted in my most recent book, "None of the Above," it likely will take some strong medicine to cure America of its infectious flirtation with socialism. I believe that medicine, believe it or not, is named Barack Obama.

It's not that I wish this virus on Americans. In fact, I have done my personal best to awaken the country to his wiles and deceptions and immorality. But it has been to little avail. Americans have been duped. They have been conned through government education and mindless media and elitist manipulation to trade in their birthright of freedom for a mess of pottage.

But their education is coming. It is not coming from me. It is coming from Barack Obama and his party's policies, which inevitably will fail over the next two years. It's going to be a painful awakening. Just wait until you see how expensive "free" health care really is. Just wait until you see how little wealth you have after he spreads it around. Just wait until you see what it's like to have to ask a government bureaucrat for permission to do things you once took for granted.

That's what's wrong with socialism. People have to see it for themselves. They have to experience the misery and the control. They have to see it with their own eyes.

Then, maybe then, we will have a chance to get America back on track. Then, maybe then, we will have enough courage and desire to fight to regain what we have lost. Then, maybe then, our experiences will protect us for a while from the freedom stealers. Then, maybe then, we will have enough sense to educate our young people as to the inherent evils of socialism so they won't be fooled again.

Joseph Farah's newest book, "None of the Above: Why 2008 Is the Year To Cast the Ultimate Protest Vote," is available now. To find out more about Joseph Farah and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;... Since you want to play q and a;... let me help you out... Do I believe in private property??? What need has fact for belief ???Sure, private property is fact, but as a fact it is no more than a form of relationship, and one that has often changed... It is by no means absolute, nor certain, since it is never held without obligation to society, nor possible without support from society... Remember, that human chattels were once property in this land; and it took a war and many deaths to dislodge that idea, but it was only an idea, a form, and a form of relationship...... How would I feel is some one took mine??? People, including the state, take my property all the time... My most significant property is my time, and the republicans appoint themselves on a regualar basis to take my life, and my time, by the hour, and by the minute... They got money, so they have plenty of time... They can let me wait for justice, and for the life I have already worked for....But I pay taxes, and I count on making a sacrifice for my community, and if I were unwilling to sacrifice for the well being of my society, I would be gracious enough to get out.... Where has socialism succeeded??? Every where... All people have come out of socialism... All primitive peoples held property in common because that gave a common defense to common rights... But then, they were also democratic, and there is no difference between democracy and socialism because political rights are defended communally, and property is defended communally in socialism... But it was only a form of relationship, and one still prevelant.... We don't say: My road, my side walk, or my hospital... Certainly, the people are saddled with the cost, because the rich evade their responsibility, but they are no less ours... What does government do well??? It preserves the peace even if there is no justice, even if the peace mocks the law, and makes a clown of the law... The government defends all the people, but not so well, since the army ismade of people who will never be rich who must risk their lives to pay to defend the land, while the rich refuse to support the same cause with any money...I say... If the rich will not join this society they should get out...What does the bible say about economics??? The pat answer is who cares... The rich don't care... Why should the poor care... Jesus said: If they sue you for your tunic, give them your britches... What a joker... But it points out how the established religious class had sucked all the wealth out of the land, and without regret... Yet; in that land of poverty, there was enough wealth in one city to build the Colloseum... The rich with the support of their religion ruined Judea.... Should we follow them in failure??? What did the founding Fathers say about economics??? Who cares what a bunch of dead people had to say??? In fact, the first five chapters of Adam Smith's Wealth of Nation was published only in 1776. I am certain Smith agreed with Marx that labor creates value...The common expression of the day was: Life, liberty and the pursuit of property... This Nation was founded upon an entirely different principal... No one cares what our fathers had to say about human rights, deficit spending, freedom and justice, but they put all they had on the line for people who wouldn't risk a nickle on the same bet... Their society taxed the wealthy to pay the cost of government... If anyone should suggest we do that today, they are libeled as a socialist.. Socialist my yassss... It is all a form of relationship... Who gives a rat what it is called as long as it works???.. Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:08 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Joseph Farah
Aug. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 3 Sep 2014
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 2 Sep 2014
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 1 Sep 2014

4 Dec 2013 The Strange Death of Miriam Carey

9 Jul 2014 When Government Fails, It Wins

29 Feb 2012 Who's Really Obsessed With 'Social Issues'?