creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Joseph Farah
Joseph Farah
15 Feb 2012
Obama's Divide-and-Conquer Strategy

Barack Obama is a not only an abortion zealot, he's also a fascist control freak — determined to make … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Vice President Rubio? Not So Fast

It's no secret that I was once a popular guest on television news shows and was virtually blacklisted after … Read More.

25 Jan 2012
What if Obama Wins, Again?

Many a pundit, not to mention Republican presidential candidate, have suggested the 2012 election is the most … Read More.

The New Prohibition

Share Comment

One lesson every American claims to have learned is that Prohibition was wrong, a mistake and a sad chapter in U.S. history, when the government tried to deny citizens something they wanted.

But I'm not at all sure what lesson Americans actually learned from the ban on the sale of spirits because ever since then, we've been banning products with far fewer harmful effects.

A couple of weeks ago, the U.S. Congress took the Prohibition craze to an all-new level of madness: banning one of the safest, most useful products ever invented. President Bush quickly signed the bill without so much as a national dialogue, let alone a debate.

I'm talking about the prohibition of the incandescent light bulb.

Just writing those words gives me a chill. Am I really living in America? Could this really be happening? Are our elected officials and elites really this insane? Do they really believe this claptrap about man-made catastrophic global warming? Or are they simply using this phantom threat for the biggest power grab in the history of Earth?

Whatever the case, because of this obviously unconstitutional, arbitrary, capricious, nonsensical legislation, in six years, you no longer will be able to buy the ordinary, harmless, efficient, safe, inexpensive, reliable, warm incandescent light bulbs that currently illuminate your home and office.

They will be phased out — replaced, as of today anyway, with unsafe, more expensive, ugly bulbs that cast light that causes headaches or worse side effects. These compact fluorescents contain toxic mercury, so when they inevitably break in your home and office, you are exposing yourself to hazardous materials. Just imagine what will happen when the bulbs find their way into landfills and the mercury begins to leech into groundwater and to run off into streams and rivers.

By the way, the new bulbs are all made in China — known for imposing the highest standards of safety on its manufacturing sweatshops.

The one and only reason for this draconian action by big government is the misguided assumption that incandescent light bulbs are somehow contributing to man-made catastrophic global warming. Not only is the theory that we are facing an apocalypse wrongheaded, unsupported by science and illogical, no matter how you slice it, but the idea that using different light bulbs can prevent or forestall the coming doomsday would be laughable were America not surrendering its most basic freedoms as a result of the bad joke.

Think of all the things you might like to ban in America: violent criminals from foreign lands who rape, murder, pillage and plunder; the legalized theft of your money by the government before you ever even see it; all organizations known as the NEA — starting with the National Endowment for the Arts and ending with the National Education Association; all foreign aid; the North American Man/Boy Love Association; driver's licenses for illegal aliens; people named Clinton and Bush from seeking national office ever again; I mean I could go on and on with my wish list.

But nowhere, nowhere, on my list — no matter how long I continued — would I seek to ban one of Thomas Edison's greatest inventions.

I seem to be nearly alone in my concern about this. Just so you understand me, this is not just about light bulbs; it's about freedom. If the Congress of the United States believes it has the authority to ban perfectly safe, perfectly useful and perfectly reliable light bulbs from being sold in America, just exactly what power doesn't the federal government have over our lives?

Because I've been covering this story for so long and with such passion and conviction, many people have written to me with their own horror stories:

"My wife got after me to start using those energy-saving CFL bulbs earlier this year in our house. After spending nearly $100 to change most of those reliable incandescent bulbs to the newer CFL bulbs, the new bulbs blew out in less than six months, even though they are supposed to last seven years. This has become a very expensive exercise and now our government is forcing me to use these useless pieces of (expletive deleted) that are many times more expensive, costing me about 10 times as much as the old bulbs. Who is getting the payoff for this idiocy?"

"I worked in GE Lighting for 34 years until they sold out my group to a private equity firm last year. They are in the process of closing down all the factories in the USA that produce parts for the incandescent bulbs thus throwing numerous people on the unemployment heap. Guess where all the new generation bulbs are produced? China. The new bulbs contain mercury, cast a horrific greenish color and produce a lot less candlepower than their so-called energy equivalent rating."

"Fluorescents can be unsafe in older homes. I live in a 1910 house that had the electrical upgraded from 30 amp to 200 amp service. But not all of it could be renovated. The light fixtures on the main floor still use really old wiring because upgrading them would have meant ripping up the ceilings. Are those of us in older homes supposed to go without lighting? What about homes on the historical register that cannot be changed?"

"I would like to suggest that we call these new mercury light bulbs 'Al Gore light bulbs.' When the environmental disaster hits from pollution to our water, etc., then everyone will know it was Al Gore who caused the expensive environmental nightmare."

"The ban on incandescent light bulbs is just thoughtless feel-good legislation. No consideration was given to the fact that fluorescent lights cause seizures in some people — and annoy others greatly. And some visually impaired folks like me need bright light from the 300-watt incandescent bulb for which there is no fluorescent substitute."

"Sorry, but I'm dumping my 37 mercury bulbs that I bought last year and replacing them with Mr. Edison's version. I have set aside a closet for the storage of these real light bulbs. I will buy them until I have no place to store them."

Strange things happen when the government bans stuff. That is the real lesson of Prohibition. There are unintended consequences. Personally, I hope one of the unintended consequences is that a little incandescent light bulb will go on inside the heads of Americans, awakening them to the fact they are on the NAFTA highway to tyranny.

The lights are still on, at least for the moment. Is anyone home?

To find out more about Joseph Farah and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Someone needs to look up their facts before writing,

Seizures
Back in the 1970's and 80's, fluorescent tubes did have a flicker; it certainly used to bug me at school, but technology has improved, here is a quote from GE:
“The first compact fluorescent bulbs flickered when they were turned on because it took a few seconds for the ballast to produce enough electricity to excite the gas inside the bulb. Thanks to the refined technology in our new GE compact fluorescent bulbs, there is now no significant flicker (less than 1 second). However, these bulbs do require a short warm-up period before they reach full brightness, which is why they may appear dim when first turned on. Compact fluorescent bulbs are best used in fixtures that are left on for longer periods of time, rather than in fixtures that are turned off and on frequently.” Please feel free to read more detailed information at their website: http://www.gelighting.com/na/home_lighting/ask_us/faq_compact.htm.

Environmental Degradation
Farah claims that CFLs contain mercury, and indeed they do. On average, compact fluorescents contain about 4mg of mercury, of which the EPA estimates that 0.27 mg will be released, as the rest is within the electrodes or glass. El Paso County collects CFLs at its waste disposal site, so you don't need to even release the 0.27mg! But let's say that we all just negligently throw our CFLs in the trash; that's 0.27mg of mercury in the landfill, not good, but what about incandescent bulbs? Most of the US, and Colorado particularly, is powered by coal. We all know that coal burning power stations release mercury, and we also know CFLs utilize less energy. Therefore less power is needed and less coal mercury released into the atmosphere. Exactly how much energy and coal mercury do we save? According to Richard Benware, who researched this for the EPA's Energy Star program, a 15W CFL will prevent the release of 5.67mg of mercury from an average power plant over its life. So to Mr. Farah, your dumping of 37 CFLs not only has caused 0.27mg x 37= 9.99mg of mercury to go unnecessarily into the landfill, but also 5.67mg x 37=209.79mg additional mercury must be released to power your energy hungry incandescent bulbs.

Mass Unemployment
We are supposedly a ‘developed' or technologically advanced nation, but we can't manage to build CFLs? Interestingly enough, most incandescent bulbs are built in China by the very same manufacturers that build CFLs. Therefore, this is not truly a CFL issue, but rather, an issue of labor, corporate ‘acumen,' and our personal need to buy cheap. Either way, until we wish to pay our fellow Americans to build products, we will continue to buy both forms from the great manufacturing machine that is China.

Old Houses
This is by far the most interesting claim, as it seems ludicrous to intimate that an old wiring system could have difficulty powering a CFL that uses less power and therefore puts less strain on the system! I know of many people in old homes (myself included) that use CFLs with no issues. As to a CFLs longevity, I converted my home to CFLs over 5 years ago, and have had only one defective bulb during this time even though three bulbs have been set in outdoor fixtures and have been both frozen and heated on our south facing wall during this time.

Oh and Mr. Farah, should you have problems reading this, then follow this link and you can purchase a CFL that produces light equivalent to a 500W incandescent.

http://www.1000bulbs.com/2-to-200-Watt-Compact-Fluorescent-Screw-In-Light-Bulbs/
Comment: #1
Posted by: Doug Bursnall
Sat Jan 5, 2008 1:16 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Joseph Farah
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

7 Feb 2007 Emasculating the National Guard

9 Jan 2008 Waterboarding Is Not Torture

16 Apr 2008 Going the Way of Rome