creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Joseph Farah
Joseph Farah
23 May 2012
Good for Franklin Graham!

Franklin Graham got it exactly right in his reaction to Barack Obama's official proclamation of support for … Read More.

16 May 2012
Good for Franklin Graham!

Franklin Graham got it exactly right in his reaction to Barack Obama's official proclamation of support for … Read More.

9 May 2012
Who Was the First Leftist?

Rush Limbaugh asked a question last week — and it got me to thinking. "Who was the first leftist?" … Read More.

The New Moral Code

Share Comment

Is morality just a matter of opinion? Is there an actual absolute standard of right and wrong? Is a new moral code developing in America today based on contemporary cultural assumptions?

Those are among the most important questions Americans can ask themselves — much more important than, for instance, who should be the next president of the United States.

A month ago, The Barna Group released the findings of research that clearly shows Americans are redefining "what it means to do the right thing in their own lives."

The pollsters asked adults whether in the previous week they had viewed pornography, used profanity in public, gambled, gossiped, engaged in sexual intercourse with someone to whom they were not married, retaliated against someone, got drunk or lied. The majority of the respondents acknowledged engaging in at least one of those eight behaviors. Specifically, 28 percent admitted to using profanity in public; 20 percent admitted to gambling, including the purchase of a lottery ticket; 19 percent admitted to intentional exposure to pornographic images; 12 percent admitted to getting drunk; 11 percent admitted they'd lied; 9 percent said they had sexual intercourse with someone to whom they were not married; and 8 percent said they had retaliated against someone.

While only 1 percent of married adults acknowledged having sex with someone other than their spouses, 21 percent of single adults said they had sex with someone in the previous week. In fact, reported The Barna Group, those younger than 25 were more than twice as likely to engage in these activities.

"Their choices made even the Baby Boomers — never regarded as a paragon of traditional morality — look like moral pillars in comparison," the study concluded.

Among the people younger than 25, 64 percent admitted to using profanity in public; 38 percent engaged in sex outside marriage; 37 percent lied; 26 percent gossiped; 33 percent used pornography; and 12 percent engaged in acts of retaliation.

Self-described liberals were five times more likely than those who described themselves as conservatives to participate in unmarried sex; more than three times as likely to view pornography; more than twice as likely to lie and to get drunk; and twice as likely to engage in retaliation and gossip, according to the study.

George Barna, who directed the study and who has been surveying national trends and morality for more than 25 years, said the results were significant: "We are witnessing the development and acceptance of a new moral code in America.

Mosaics (those younger than 25) have had little exposure to traditional moral teaching and limited accountability for such behavior. The moral code began to disintegrate when the generation before them — the Baby Busters — pushed the limits that had been challenged by their parents — the Baby Boomers. The result is that without much fanfare or visible leadership, the U.S. has created a moral system based on convenience, feelings, and selfishness."

It may be an understatement, but this trend does not bode well for America's future.

There once was a widely accepted moral code in America. It was the Bible. That doesn't mean people didn't violate that code. They always did. But not with the ease and regularity we are witnessing today — especially with those who have little or no grounding in the Scriptures.

Barna has more sobering words about what his findings portend for the future: "The consistent deterioration of the Bible as the source of moral truth has led to a nation where people have become independent judges of right and wrong, basing their choices on feelings and circumstances. It is not likely that America will return to a more traditional moral code until the nation experiences significant pain from its moral choices."

Are you feeling the pain yet? Is it time to take another look at what we believe and how we act? Are you ready to reconsider the value of the moral code handed down on Mount Sinai?

Joseph Farah's newest book, "None of the Above: Why 2008 Is the Year To Cast the Ultimate Protest Vote," is available now. To find out more about Joseph Farah and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;...If you are asking me then, NO, NO, and Maybe. But morality is not a matter of codes. It is not a matter of laws. What ever ones community is, is moral because that is the group that protects your rghts. Their view of good is your view of good, and not because it is reasonble, because few have ability to judge their own community one way or the other. Acommunity, on the other hand, can gather a sense of what is moral by what is healthy, since what is immoral is generally unhealthy. It is for this reason that murder and mayham are against most moral codes. They are not good for people. ...Yet nothin so well as morality points out the division we have in society. If I can look at you and say: not my people, and not my morality, it is because we are not one people sharing a common moral guide. This society has many moral codes, and in general, it is completely immoral. There is not one good moral quality to our economy. It gives birth to many immoralities. It leads to economic inequality and economic injustice and there is no place on this earth where economic injustice does not lead to political injustice, and sexual injustice. So let me point out to you sir, that it is not individuals who are moral, but communities, and the individual can only accept his community to have morality. Just the reverse of this; we expect that the economy and the society and the government can be immoral, but that the individual must be moral, and not just moral, but moral with an absolute sense of morality..... This is just one more injustice. To impose a morality you do not follow is just one more example of violence and coersion. If you want to see morality, follow the individual home to his true community because there he will be moral. If you want your society moral, build it into a community. Make the community into a defense of rights. Give it a sense of time so that it can judge the character of the individual, and guide him to goodness, and to health. A true community can envision tomorrow, and like a life boat, it carries its members into that future together. It does not throw people over board like our society does, but then, our society is not a community....Thanks... Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Oct 9, 2008 8:00 PM
Your moral code is easy to decipher, it's in your words, your writing. I respect your moral code and trust you are a moral and ethical man. Refering to an earlier column you wrote, tell me why then do you do as unethical and immoral a thing as to put your words in Sarah Palin's mouth? If she should read your column and answer as you've suggested, that would be your answer, not hers. Will you be there to prop her up for the other hard questions and decisions? I think not. If you fear her answer, there is a part of you that must fear her role as VP. Your fear of her answer tells me that you do not believe she is capable. As to her moral code you seem to admire, she's a conservative Christian, she has a young daugher pregnant and not married, a son who was selling drugs and given the choice of going to jail or join the Army, and she is accused of abuse of power in her position as governor. She has a number of children, but her ambition and time seems to have been for her career. She is being held up as a good Christian with a solid Christian moral code. Do you wonder why it gets so little respect? Sarah Palin, like many in politics, is a wannabe Christian. Puts in on and takes it off, just like her lipstick.
Comment: #2
Posted by: liz
Sat Oct 11, 2008 1:58 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Joseph Farah
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

23 Feb 2011 Are 58 Percent of Americans Insane?

22 Jun 2011 The New Tuskegee Experiment

20 Dec 2006 Che Chic at Target