creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Joseph Farah
Joseph Farah
8 Feb 2012
Vice President Rubio? Not So Fast

It's no secret that I was once a popular guest on television news shows and was virtually blacklisted after … Read More.

25 Jan 2012
What if Obama Wins, Again?

Many a pundit, not to mention Republican presidential candidate, have suggested the 2012 election is the most … Read More.

18 Jan 2012
Meeting the Ron Paul Challenge

HOUSTON — Following the inspiring meeting of conservative Christian activists last weekend, my biggest … Read More.

Spear-chucking Chimps

Share Comment

The scientific journal Current Biology reports chimpanzees in Senegal regularly fashion wooden spears and hunt other primates with them, an observation, the report's authors say, that could have implications for human evolution.

Let's assume, for a moment, that the observations of researchers Jill Pruetz and Paco Bertolani are accurate and unaffected by their own obvious faith in the evolutionary creed.

It doesn't surprise me in the least that chimps might make primitive, little spears. It was the evolutionary scientists who taught us a generation ago that the only difference between man and other animals was that we used tools. I never bought that either.

Personally, I think the difference between man and other animals is that we are made in the image of God. That's my belief. You don't have to agree with me, but I think there is considerably more evidence to support my view than the view that life arose spontaneously from non-life and then evolved into higher life forms.

But let's stick to the topic at hand — the spear-chucking chimps.

Let's try to imagine how a chimp with a stick might somehow fashion itself into another species — because that is ultimately what the authors of this report are suggesting.

How could that happen?

Of what consequence is the spear? How might a weapon or a tool cause one species to change into another? What changes at the molecular biological level occur when that primate picks up the sharpened stick?

Help me out here. These are scientists. Why don't they explain what they mean?

The reason they don't explain is because there is no explanation.

Charles Darwin had no understanding of molecular biology. That's why he was free to speculate that if an animal flapped its arms long enough they might someday turn into wings — wings he could leave to his offspring.

But today we know that's not the way molecular biology works.

Also, back in the days of Darwin, he was free to speculate that certain apes began using tools and became dominant over other apes. The survival of the fittest led to a new breed of apes — tool-using apes.

But the problem with that is you're still dealing with apes. How does the species transition into a new species? Where has that ever happened? How could it without one species dying out first?

Evolutionists don't have answers to these questions.

The DNA of that chimp doesn't change when he starts throwing a spear. The DNA of his descendant doesn't change either. You can go right down the line and the DNA of his grandchimps and great-grandchimps is still going to be the stuff of chimp DNA. It's not going to be another species. Behavior doesn't change molecular biology.

So what do you have after, say, 50 generations of spear-chucking chimps?

Maybe chimps that have perfected the art of spear making and spear chucking. But I guarantee for sure they are still chimps. Nothing has happened that could possibly affect their molecular structure — the very essence of what makes them chimps.

In fact, I'll go further. Let the evolutionists isolate these chimps and do whatever they want to them, change their environment, let them watch "Tarzan" movies, allow them to listen to self-empowerment CDs, permit them to interact with people. Do this for generations. You know what you will have when you're all done? Chimps.

You can teach them to ride bicycles. You can dress them up. You can even teach them to use some simple tools. But, at the end of the day, they're still going to be chimps. Their DNA will be no different, their molecular biology unaffected.

And, after that experiment, the people who believe in evolution are probably still going to believe in evolution. But, no matter what they believe, they can't change the fact that they, too, are made in the image of God.

To find out more about Joseph Farah, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2007 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
This is simply the most ridiculous column I've read from this guy yet. It's almost funny just how depraved of accurate information this article is. The degree of ignorance on display here is astonishing.
When the Bubonic Plague ravaged Europe in the middle ages, a certain number of people possessed a genetic makeup that made them immune to the terrible disease.
Over time and death, the number of people that possessed a vulnerable gentic makeup to the disease no longer existed, because they died. Because they were dead, they did not make any more babies vulnerable to the disease. Most people that were left possessed a genetic makeup of immunity to Bubonic Plague.
The people left over had babies that also possessed the immunity gene, and so did their babies and so on.
So over time, an extremelly short period of time when considering things like natural selection and evolutionary theory, most people were people immune to Bubonic Plague, and the disease stopped its scurge.
This is called natural selection, albeit a simplistic explanation, it is nonetheless an observable and testable demonstration of the vehicle behind evolution. It's only a theory inasmuch as "the Earth is round" is a theory.
What's funny about this guy Farah is that in another column he talks about mutated (mutation: an important property to the very thing he is saying does NOT exist in this column) diseases coming back stronger than ever.
Hence, according to Farah, an evolutionary term such as "mutation" can apply to diseases, but not humans, and even then primarily in cases where the disease attacks predominately homosexuals.
Nice to know Darwinian ideas work when they're convenient for bigotry.
For some reason religious people fear facts like evolution and "the Earth is round" and so on, as something that threatens their beliefs and faith. I have no idea why, because it is the very details of most organized religions that discredit themselves (giant arcs with 2 of every species on it for 40 days, rivers into blood, unicorns, etc.) far more than anything Darwin ever proposed.
At any rate, there are more false statements in this column than I've seen from one of these hacks in a long time. My four year old daughter understands more about molecular biology than this guy.
Thanks (and Farah, you should read something sometime),
-GA
Comment: #1
Posted by: Gregory Armitage
Sat Mar 1, 2008 9:42 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Joseph Farah
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Terence Jeffrey
Terence JeffreyUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Alan Reynolds
Alan ReynoldsUpdated 15 Feb 2012

19 Aug 2009 What Conspiracy Theory?

26 Dec 2007 Home-schoolers Beware!

18 Mar 2009 Characteristics of a Terrorist Suspect