creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Joseph Farah
Joseph Farah
10 Feb 2016
Don't Let Rubio Fool You Twice

My good friend, Rush Limbaugh, is willing to give Marco Rubio grace for possibly making a "mistake" with the … Read More.

3 Feb 2016
Gasp! Have You Seen Trump's Negative Ratings?

There's something new for Donald Trump haters to be excited about. The latest Gallup poll shows the GOP front-… Read More.

27 Jan 2016
Trump and the National Review Irrelevants

The National Review rounded up a couple dozen "conservatives" to denounce Donald Trump and tell the world … Read More.

Obama's 'Civilian National Security Force'

Comment

With all the reporters covering the major presidential candidates, it amazes me no one ever seems to ask the right questions.

For several days now, my news organization has been hounding Barack Obama's campaign about a statement he made July 2 in Colorado Springs, Colo. — a statement that blew my mind and has had me scratching my head ever since.

In talking about his plans to double the size of the Peace Corps and nearly quadruple the size of AmeriCorps, he made this rather shocking (and chilling) pledge: "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

Now, because I never have heard anyone inside or out of government use the phrase "civilian national security force" before, I am more than a little curious about what he has in mind.

Is it possible I am the only journalist in America who seeks clarification on this campaign promise? What does it mean?

If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn't this a rather big deal?

I thought Democrats generally believe the U.S. spends too much on the military. How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of secret national police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together?

Now, maybe he was misquoted by the Congressional Quarterly and the Chicago Tribune. I guess it's possible. If so, you would think he would want to set the record straight. Maybe he misspoke. That certainly has happened before. Again, why wouldn't the rest of my colleagues show some curiosity about such a major and, frankly, bone-chilling proposition?

Are we talking about creating a police state here?

The U.S.

Army alone has nearly 500,000 troops. That doesn't count reserves or the National Guard. In 2007, the Defense Department's budget was $439 billion.

Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? What did he mean?

So far, despite our attempts to find out, the Obama campaign is not talking.

At this point, all I can do is enlist your help — and the help of every other journalist who still thinks the American people have a right to know the specifics about a presidential candidate's biggest and boldest initiatives before the election. I also want to ask radio talk show hosts across America to start asking this same question. I have a feeling if others join our quest, we might get clarification yet on this proposal from Obama.

Whom will Obama appoint to administer this new "civilian national security force"? Where will the money come from? Where in the Constitution does he see justification for the federal government creating such a domestic army? The questions are endless.

But before we can hope to get to the specifics, we need much more in the way of generalizations from Obama.

Certainly, there have been initiatives like this elsewhere — Cuba, the Soviet Union, China, Venezuela, North Korea. But has anything like this ever been proposed in a free country?

I have a feeling there would be more questions from the press if I had proposed the creation of something as preposterous as a "civilian national security force" than there has been after the presidential candidate currently leading in most of the polls proposed it. I'm quite sure I would be hung out to dry as some kind of Nazi thug. Meanwhile, Obama makes this wild suggestion, and it is met with a collective yawn from the watchdogs.

Help me out here. What am I missing?

Can I get a hand?

To find out more about Joseph Farah and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Where is the people's representation? Why does the government suggest policing the country in such an aggressive oppressive way without the approval or authorization of the people. This is an offensive against this free people and I want answers and accountability. THe president and his party is accountable to the people He has no right to tread on our freedom for his personal and party agenda! Impeach Obama for his blatant treason against the people and democratic process.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Larissa Keller
Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:54 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Joseph Farah
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Patrick Buchanan
Pat BuchananUpdated 12 Feb 2016
Veronique de RugyUpdated 11 Feb 2016
Matt Towery
Matt ToweryUpdated 11 Feb 2016

22 May 2012 Good for Franklin Graham!

17 Sep 2013 Ruther Bader Ginsburg: Meet the Constitution

10 Jun 2009 Is Questioning Obama 'Offensive'?