creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Joseph Farah
Joseph Farah
27 Aug 2014
What's America's No. 1 National Security Threat?

What does a nation do when its highest official represents the biggest security threat it faces? That's what … Read More.

20 Aug 2014
Something for Rand Paul to Think About

I think Sen. Rand Paul has some great ideas. I think it's even possible God has placed him in a unique … Read More.

13 Aug 2014
When Obama Orders Amnesty

Now that House Speaker John Boehner has ruled out impeaching President Barack Obama, what will Republicans do … Read More.

Obama's 'Civilian National Security Force'

Comment

With all the reporters covering the major presidential candidates, it amazes me no one ever seems to ask the right questions.

For several days now, my news organization has been hounding Barack Obama's campaign about a statement he made July 2 in Colorado Springs, Colo. — a statement that blew my mind and has had me scratching my head ever since.

In talking about his plans to double the size of the Peace Corps and nearly quadruple the size of AmeriCorps, he made this rather shocking (and chilling) pledge: "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

Now, because I never have heard anyone inside or out of government use the phrase "civilian national security force" before, I am more than a little curious about what he has in mind.

Is it possible I am the only journalist in America who seeks clarification on this campaign promise? What does it mean?

If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn't this a rather big deal?

I thought Democrats generally believe the U.S. spends too much on the military. How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of secret national police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together?

Now, maybe he was misquoted by the Congressional Quarterly and the Chicago Tribune. I guess it's possible. If so, you would think he would want to set the record straight. Maybe he misspoke. That certainly has happened before. Again, why wouldn't the rest of my colleagues show some curiosity about such a major and, frankly, bone-chilling proposition?

Are we talking about creating a police state here?

The U.S.

Army alone has nearly 500,000 troops. That doesn't count reserves or the National Guard. In 2007, the Defense Department's budget was $439 billion.

Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? What did he mean?

So far, despite our attempts to find out, the Obama campaign is not talking.

At this point, all I can do is enlist your help — and the help of every other journalist who still thinks the American people have a right to know the specifics about a presidential candidate's biggest and boldest initiatives before the election. I also want to ask radio talk show hosts across America to start asking this same question. I have a feeling if others join our quest, we might get clarification yet on this proposal from Obama.

Whom will Obama appoint to administer this new "civilian national security force"? Where will the money come from? Where in the Constitution does he see justification for the federal government creating such a domestic army? The questions are endless.

But before we can hope to get to the specifics, we need much more in the way of generalizations from Obama.

Certainly, there have been initiatives like this elsewhere — Cuba, the Soviet Union, China, Venezuela, North Korea. But has anything like this ever been proposed in a free country?

I have a feeling there would be more questions from the press if I had proposed the creation of something as preposterous as a "civilian national security force" than there has been after the presidential candidate currently leading in most of the polls proposed it. I'm quite sure I would be hung out to dry as some kind of Nazi thug. Meanwhile, Obama makes this wild suggestion, and it is met with a collective yawn from the watchdogs.

Help me out here. What am I missing?

Can I get a hand?

To find out more about Joseph Farah and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Where is the people's representation? Why does the government suggest policing the country in such an aggressive oppressive way without the approval or authorization of the people. This is an offensive against this free people and I want answers and accountability. THe president and his party is accountable to the people He has no right to tread on our freedom for his personal and party agenda! Impeach Obama for his blatant treason against the people and democratic process.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Larissa Keller
Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:54 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Joseph Farah
Aug. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 3 Sep 2014
Michael Barone
Michael BaroneUpdated 2 Sep 2014
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 2 Sep 2014

23 Apr 2014 Preaching Income Inequality Pays $225,000

25 Jan 2012 What if Obama Wins, Again?

17 Apr 2007 How to Prevent the Next Massacre