creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Joseph Farah
Joseph Farah
16 Apr 2014
Harry Reid's Last Roundup

Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy performed a remarkable public service for America over the last couple weeks. He … Read More.

9 Apr 2014
The Fascist Mozilla Guerrillas

Score another victory for the fascist Mozilla guerrillas of California. Who are the Mozilla guerrillas? They … Read More.

2 Apr 2014
The GOP Establishment's War on the Tea Party

The gloves are off. No more fooling around. No more games. No more nuance. No more straddling the fence or … Read More.

Obama's 'Civilian National Security Force'

Comment

With all the reporters covering the major presidential candidates, it amazes me no one ever seems to ask the right questions.

For several days now, my news organization has been hounding Barack Obama's campaign about a statement he made July 2 in Colorado Springs, Colo. — a statement that blew my mind and has had me scratching my head ever since.

In talking about his plans to double the size of the Peace Corps and nearly quadruple the size of AmeriCorps, he made this rather shocking (and chilling) pledge: "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

Now, because I never have heard anyone inside or out of government use the phrase "civilian national security force" before, I am more than a little curious about what he has in mind.

Is it possible I am the only journalist in America who seeks clarification on this campaign promise? What does it mean?

If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn't this a rather big deal?

I thought Democrats generally believe the U.S. spends too much on the military. How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of secret national police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together?

Now, maybe he was misquoted by the Congressional Quarterly and the Chicago Tribune. I guess it's possible. If so, you would think he would want to set the record straight. Maybe he misspoke. That certainly has happened before. Again, why wouldn't the rest of my colleagues show some curiosity about such a major and, frankly, bone-chilling proposition?

Are we talking about creating a police state here?

The U.S.

Army alone has nearly 500,000 troops. That doesn't count reserves or the National Guard. In 2007, the Defense Department's budget was $439 billion.

Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? What did he mean?

So far, despite our attempts to find out, the Obama campaign is not talking.

At this point, all I can do is enlist your help — and the help of every other journalist who still thinks the American people have a right to know the specifics about a presidential candidate's biggest and boldest initiatives before the election. I also want to ask radio talk show hosts across America to start asking this same question. I have a feeling if others join our quest, we might get clarification yet on this proposal from Obama.

Whom will Obama appoint to administer this new "civilian national security force"? Where will the money come from? Where in the Constitution does he see justification for the federal government creating such a domestic army? The questions are endless.

But before we can hope to get to the specifics, we need much more in the way of generalizations from Obama.

Certainly, there have been initiatives like this elsewhere — Cuba, the Soviet Union, China, Venezuela, North Korea. But has anything like this ever been proposed in a free country?

I have a feeling there would be more questions from the press if I had proposed the creation of something as preposterous as a "civilian national security force" than there has been after the presidential candidate currently leading in most of the polls proposed it. I'm quite sure I would be hung out to dry as some kind of Nazi thug. Meanwhile, Obama makes this wild suggestion, and it is met with a collective yawn from the watchdogs.

Help me out here. What am I missing?

Can I get a hand?

To find out more about Joseph Farah and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.



Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Joseph Farah
Apr. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 21 Apr 2014
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 20 Apr 2014
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 20 Apr 2014

17 Jan 2007 Presidents Must Obey Law, Too

26 Sep 2012 Why Are Americans Killing Themselves?

26 Mar 2008 Obama Digs Hole Deeper