creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Joseph Farah
Joseph Farah
15 Feb 2012
Obama's Divide-and-Conquer Strategy

Barack Obama is a not only an abortion zealot, he's also a fascist control freak — determined to make … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Vice President Rubio? Not So Fast

It's no secret that I was once a popular guest on television news shows and was virtually blacklisted after … Read More.

25 Jan 2012
What if Obama Wins, Again?

Many a pundit, not to mention Republican presidential candidate, have suggested the 2012 election is the most … Read More.

Barack 'Che' Obama

Share Comment

As Barack Obama continues to clean Hillary Clinton's clock in primary after primary, maybe it's time to take this guy a little more seriously. He could be the president of the United States.

His appeal, especially when compared with "Shrillary," is understandable. He looks good. He sounds good. He seems like a nice guy.

Shrillary is anything but likable; and her voice sounds like a rusty nail scraping a blackboard. I won't comment on her looks, except to say most people are sick to death of seeing her. Period. End of story.

We knew she had high negatives, but we never realized how high they were among Democrats, too. What we know now is her appeal was 49 percent wide and a millimeter deep. And that, quite probably, leaves us with Barack Obama, who has all the momentum on his side.

Let's remember that Barack Obama is a first-term senator. It's extremely rare in American history, especially recently, that members of the Senate or House of Representatives are elected directly to the presidency. Why? Probably because legislative experience gives us little idea about real leadership, executive ability, decisiveness, the ability to command, and other qualities we look for in a president. The most recent senator elected to the White House was John Kennedy. It can happen, but it's rare.

Now combine that with the fact that Obama is midway through his first term in the Senate. He is, politically speaking, a virtual unknown, without any executive, management or military experience in his portfolio. Does that disqualify him? No. But it does suggest we don't really know much about him or his ability to cope with the pressures and decisions he would have to face as president.

There is also the matter of his opinions on the great issues of the day. He is virtually indistinguishable in that regard from Shrillary. Yes, his style is an improvement. But on substance, he is a political clone — albeit with darker skin and a deeper voice. What does that tell you? It suggests he is, like Hillary, a dyed-in-the-wool socialist, who, in the names of compassion, fairness, Mom and apple pie, would strip America of the freedom that has made it a shining city on a hill for 230 years.

That opinion was solidified with me when I heard about Obama's volunteer offices in Houston displaying a Cuban flag emblazoned with an image of Ernesto "Che" Guevara.

What did Obama have to say about it? He didn't insist it come down. He didn't denounce it as "insensitive" or "sickening" or "an emblem of evil." He simply dismissed it as "inappropriate."

Inappropriate? "Inappropriate" is when somebody tells an off-color joke. "Inappropriate" is when a campaign worker passes gas in the office.

"Inappropriate" is when someone tells you the three people they most fear in life are Osama, Obama and Chelsea's mama. Displaying an image of Che Guevara as if he were some kind of Third World hero is an abomination. Check that, it's an Obama-nation.

Maybe Obama is just too young and inexperienced to know who Che really was. Let's give him the benefit of the doubt, along with this refresher course:

Guevara was born in Argentina in 1928. In 1952, he took a trip across South America that was dramatized in "The Motorcycle Diaries." He took part in leftist movements in Guatemala and Mexico. He joined Castro's revolutionary Cuban army in 1956 as a top commander and Castro's personal physician. He helped Castro topple the regime in Havana in 1959.

As Castro's right-hand man in the new regime, Guevara ordered the execution of hundreds of people while in charge of the notorious La Caba, a prison in Havana. He was unapologetic about the mass killings of innocent people, explaining, "To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary. These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution! And a revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate."

Pure hate. It wasn't the first time Guevara used the expression nor the last. He explained how it must be a tool in the arsenal of revolutionary terrorists — permitting them to do things they never would be able to accomplish otherwise.

"Hatred as an element of struggle; unbending hatred for the enemy, which pushes a human being beyond his natural limitations, making him into an effective, violent, selective, and cold-blooded killing machine — this is what our soldiers must become," Guevara said.

During the Cuban missile crisis, Guevara wanted to wage a nuclear war with the U.S. He thought it would lead to a better world, regardless of whether millions were killed. He was overruled by cooler heads in the Kremlin and in Cuba. The nuclear missiles headed for Cuba, 90 miles from the U.S., were returned to Russia.

Disgraced by the slight, Guevara went to create new revolutionary movements and wage armed struggle in Africa and Latin America. He was killed in the jungles of Bolivia in 1967. Guevara was proud of the fact that he personally put bullets in the backs of the heads of many he considered to be counterrevolutionary.

Once again, in rallying his guerrillas in Angola, he wrote: "Blind hate against the enemy creates a forceful impulse that cracks the boundaries of natural human limitations, transforming the soldier in an effective, selective and cold killing machine. A people without hate cannot triumph against the adversary."

Would you say displaying this man's picture is "inappropriate"? I'd say that's the biggest understatement since Gen. George Custer said: "Over that hill, I think they're friendly Indians."

Like I said, maybe Obama just doesn't know what a monster Che was. But then again, if he doesn't, he probably shouldn't be running for president of the United States.

To find out more about Joseph Farah and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
This article is an example of the work of a person who never got beyond the kindergarten stage in his emotional development. To his kind of mind, it's all about cooties. Remember cooties? Don't know if kids still play it these days, but it sure is alive and well among "adults" like Mr. Farah. Cooties is the last thing in the world you want to have and the greatest insult you can hurl at a fellow urchin. And the most interesting thing about this contagion is that nobody knows what it really is except you don't want people to think you've got it. When somebody says you've got it, it's kind of like being called a liberal. Or a socialist. From that point on it doesn't really matter what you think, what you do, or who you are.
I see Mr. Farah has given us a lot of juicy historical allegations about Che Guevara which, according to Mr. Farah, make it next to criminal that Barack Obama didn't do more than say it was inappropriate for one of his campaign offices to display a Cuban flag sporting an image of Guevara on it. Well, pardon me if I don't just accept with blind faith Mr. Farah's interpretation of Guevara's history, or the proposition that displaying the flag warranted capital punishment for the person who did it. Last time I checked there was a long history of colonial oppression behind the Cuban revolution, and the United States doesn't exactly come out of it smelling like a rose.
More importantly, and I think those who are even slightly more emotionally developed than Mr. Farah will agree with me, Mr. Farah's infantile brand of name-calling is far more offensive than Mr. Obama's understated criticism of a couple of his overzealous campaign supporters. Perhaps when Mr. Farah gets enough people interested in playing cooties with him in his sandbox he can run for office and show us the proper way to mete out punishment to overzealous campaign supporters.
He obviously subscribes to the belief that reality is what's boldly proposed and forcefully argued. It's all about calling people names and playing the game of cooties. He needs to go back to school for a year with a good old-fashioned, no-nonsense kindergarten teacher (you know, the kind the Republicans say we need more of) to teach him the basic social skills and etiquette it take the reigns of adulthood in society.
P.S. To the editors of Creators.com: Really, can't you do better than this for one of your top five picks? Are you that desperate?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Masako
Sat Feb 16, 2008 10:50 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Joseph Farah
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

26 Mar 2008 Obama Digs Hole Deeper

12 Dec 2007 What Will You Do If They Shoot Up Your Church?

6 Jan 2010 Wikipedia Founder's 'Civility' Lecture