creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
15 Oct 2014
Crumbling Constitution

Does the Constitution still matter? When it was written, Ben Franklin said the Founders gave us a republic, "… Read More.

8 Oct 2014
Poverty

Fifty years ago, President Lyndon Johnson declared "War on Poverty." It sounded great to me. I was taught at Princeton,… Read More.

1 Oct 2014
It's Better Now

Americans now face beheadings, gang warfare, Ebola, ISIS and a new war in Syria. It's natural to assume that … Read More.

There Ought Not to Be a Law

Comment

I'm a libertarian in part because I see a false choice offered by the political left and right: government control of the economy — or government control of our personal lives.

People on both sides think of themselves as freedom lovers. The left thinks government can lessen income inequality. The right thinks government can make Americans more virtuous. I say we're best off if neither side attempts to advance its agenda via government.

Let both argue about things like drug use and poverty, but let no one be coerced by government unless he steals or attacks someone. Beyond the small amount needed to fund a highly limited government, let no one forcibly take other people's money. When in doubt, leave it out — or rather, leave it to the market and other voluntary institutions.

But this is not how most people think. Most people see a world full of problems that can be solved by laws. They assume it's just the laziness, stupidity or indifference of politicians that keeps them from solving our problems. But government is force — and inefficient.

That's why it's better if government didn't try to address most of life's problems.

People tend to believe that "government can!" When problems arise, they say, "There ought to be a law!"

Even the collapse of the Soviet Union, caused by the appalling results of central planning, didn't shock the world into abandoning big government. Europe began talking about some sort of "market socialism." Politicians in the United States dreamt of a "third way" between capitalism and socialism, and of "managed capitalism" — where politicians often replace the invisible hand.

George W. Bush ran for president promising a "lean" government, but he decided to create a $50 billion per year prescription drug entitlement and build a new bureaucracy called No Child Left Behind. Under Bush, Republicans doubled discretionary spending (the greatest increase since LBJ), expanded the drug war and hired 90,000 new regulators.

Bush's increases in regulation didn't mollify the media's demand for still more.

Then came Barack Obama and spending big enough to bankrupt all our children.

That fueled the tea party and the 2010 elections.

The tea party gave me hope, but I was fooled again. Within months, the new "fiscally conservative" Republicans voted to preserve farm subsidies, vowed to "protect" Medicare and cringed when Romney's future veep choice, Rep. Paul Ryan, proposed his mild deficit plan.

It is unfortunate that the United States, founded partly on libertarian principles, cannot admit that government has gotten too big. East Asian countries embraced markets and flourished. Sweden and Germany liberalized their labor markets and saw their economies improve.

But we keep passing new rules.

The enemy here is human intuition. Amid the dazzling bounty of the marketplace, it's easy to take the benefits of markets for granted. I can go to a foreign country and stick a piece of plastic in the wall, and cash will come out. I can give that same piece of plastic to a stranger who doesn't even speak my language — and he'll rent me a car for a week. When I get home, Visa or MasterCard will send me the accounting — correct to the penny. We take such things for granted.

Government, by contrast, can't even count votes accurately.

Yet whenever there are problems, people turn to government. Despite the central planners' long record of failure, few of us like to think that the government which sits atop us, taking credit for everything, could really be all that rotten.

The great 20th-century libertarian H.L. Mencken lamented, "A government at bottom is nothing more than a group of men, and as a practical matter most of them are inferior men. ... Yet these nonentities, by the intellectual laziness of men in general ... are generally obeyed as a matter of duty (and) assumed to have a kind of wisdom that is superior to ordinary wisdom."

There is nothing government can do that we cannot do better as free individuals — and as groups of individuals working freely together.

Without big government, our possibilities are limitless.

John Stossel is host of "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of "Give Me a Break" and of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel, visit his site at <a href="http://www.johnstossel.com" <http://www.johnstossel.com>>johnstossel.com</a>. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM



Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Mr. Stossel,

I completely agree with you. There are more and more people who are coming to the same conclusion as you and I already have. The problem, then, is how do we actually implement the roll back of big government? Yes, working to communicate and convince others about our Libertarian principles is a start. However, what would you suggest to accelerate the buy-in?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Mike Hermens
Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:37 AM
I MOSTLY agree with this. Intelligent individuals CAN run their lives much better without government. Unfortunately, the vast majority of people in this world (and this country) are just STUPID. That's why THEY (the stupid people) ALLOW government to run their lives. Unfortunately, it appears as if Cyril Kornbluth's "The Marching Morons" have come to reality.
Comment: #2
Posted by: JD
Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:04 PM
MR. STOSSEL:
YOU ARE ONE OF MY FAVORITE FOX NEWS PEOPLE, COMPARED TO O'REILLY. CAN'T YOU BOOT HIM OUT AND REPLACE HIM. YOU ARE SO MUCH SMARTER AND YOU DON'T HAVE THAT BIG MOUTH THAT HE SCREAMS WITH - NOT LETTING HIS GUESTS GET A WORD IN EDGE WISE.
IT IS JUST TOO BAD THAT MORE PEOPLE DIDN'T PICK RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT, BUT HE HAS SO MANY GOOD ANSWERS ON MANY SUBJECTS LIKE ENDING THE ENDLESS FOREIGN-WARS WE KEEP GETTING INVOLVED IN.
I JUST READ YOUR ARTICLE ABOUT THE WAR ON DRUGS - IT IS SO RIGHT-ON, BUT IT IS A BIG BUSINESS - GOVERNMENT BUSINESS - IT HAS FILLED OUR PRISONS TO OVER-FLOWING CAPACITY. IT IS JUST SO SAD AND STUPID JUST LIKE PROHIBITION.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Ken BORGIE
Wed Aug 29, 2012 6:06 PM
Mr. Stossel,
I agree with your sentiments, and only wish I could express to others as well as you have. I would encourage you to explore why we have big government on both sides. Big government is most always the result of big money infiltrating all areas of our government for their own gain. Furthermore, the cornerstone for all of this corruption must be the big world banks whom I suspect profit from our Federal Reserve, and our willingness to go to war. In my view, it is a systematic approach to eradicate the middle class.
Thank you!
Comment: #4
Posted by: E.C. Paul
Sat Sep 1, 2012 10:13 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
John Stossel
Oct. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 22 Oct 2014
Newspaper ContributorsUpdated 21 Oct 2014
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 21 Oct 2014

14 Apr 2010 Lower and Simplify Taxes!

16 Jun 2010 End the Drug War

6 Feb 2008 USA Makes Adoption Harder