opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
3 Feb 2016
Political Arrogance

After the Iowa caucus results, it looks like Hillary Clinton vs. Marco Rubio in November! They lead the … Read More.

27 Jan 2016
Running on Empty

Cars run on fuel. Politicians run on votes, and they'll do almost anything to get them. That includes … Read More.

20 Jan 2016
Economic Myths

Hillary Clinton: "Of course we want to raise the minimum wage!" Donald Trump: If we trade with China, "they … Read More.

The Big Three Should Stand on Their Own Feet


Do the executives of the Big Three automobile manufacturers think we're stupid?

"The societal costs [of the loss of General Motors, Ford or Chrysler] would be catastrophic — three million jobs lost within the first year," said GM chief Rick Wagoner during last week's congressional hearing (

Fortunately, Congress didn't fall for it — yet. But next month or next year is another story. President-elect Obama is sympathetic to a bailout.

The auto heads tried to pin their problems on the general economic decline. They also said their companies have gone far in working to turn themselves around. "We have taken tough actions to cut costs, at the same time investing billions in fuel-efficient vehicles and new generations of advanced propulsion technologies," Wagoner wrote in The Wall Street Journal (

If so, why would that make the companies deserving of a bailout? The economic slowdown affects everyone. Why single out the carmakers?

And if GM and the others have done so much to raise productivity and improve their products, they would attract private capital. Investors are always looking for profitable ventures.

What Wagoner and his colleagues hope we'll overlook is Frederic Bastiat's lesson ( Government intervention must not be judged only by the immediate and obvious consequences for the intended beneficiaries but also by the unseen effects on the rest of society. If the automakers get $25 billion from the capital markets because the federal government guarantees the loans, other businesses won't be able to borrow that money. Resources that go into making cars can't be used to make something else.

Why should politicians decide who gets those resources? It's not as though congressmen using government force are better than the decentralized voluntary market at spotting the most promising investments. Far from it. They will make their decisions on the basis of political considerations, such as who gave them contributions or might finance a get-out-the-vote drive in the next election.

Private investors, risking their own money, have an acute interest in separating the economic wheat from the chaff.

Their income depends on finding ventures that would have the best prospects of pleasing consumers. We already know that Detroit's automakers have failed that test against Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Kia, Hyundai, BMW and Daimler.

"The future of the domestic auto business is critical to the health of the U.S. economy," Wagoner writes. But why should we believe that? Sure, America needs cars. But there is more than one way to "produce" a car. You can produce it directly, or you can produce it indirectly by making something else and trading it for a car. There's no shame in producing cars indirectly.

Anyway, the Big Three are not the only carmakers in the United States. Foreign automakers have factories in the United States that employ 113,000 American workers ( Who cares if the cars have foreign names?

GM, Ford and Chrysler probably wouldn't even disappear without a bailout. Bankruptcy would most likely mean reorganization under court supervision, protection from creditors and revision of union contracts. The companies would finally do what they should have done years ago: shut down more plants, eliminate some dealerships and get rid of some union rules. It would be a good thing. The companies would come out leaner.

It's clear that Detroit would prefer to deal with congressmen than bankruptcy judges. Having Congress tell auto companies how to make cars and what to pay executives is offensive. But that's what will happen if politicians put up loan guarantees. A bailout would be a reverse Robin Hood story: robbing from the less wealthy to give to the more wealthy. As Daniel Mitchell of the Cato Institute writes, "[T]he corporate bureaucrats at the Big Three are among the very richest Americans. The UAW bosses make extravagant salaries as well, and even regular union workers make [more] than the average American" ( An economy in recession needs to cleanse itself of bad investments born of years of policy errors and managerial blunders. Keeping capital locked up in failing companies will slow the recovery and extend the hardship longer than necessary.

John Stossel is co-anchor of ABC News' "20/20" and the author of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at




1 Comments | Post Comment

Barack Obama will soon become the 44th President! He's well-educated, well-dressed, and
an articulate speaker! He's certainly not the ‘mutt' he calls himself, even as a joke, when
talking about the new dog for his daughters.

Americans, of all races, voted for change, without thinking or caring about their own
responsiblities or contributions to society. Too many people made statements ‘I voted for
Obama because blacks have been at bottom of totem pole too long, and he's vindicated us!'
First of all, Mr. Obama is as much white as he's black! The reason you've been on bottom,
as you put it, is because you chose your lifestyle by not working, living off social and
welfare programs, having illegitimate babies, doing drugs, raping, murdering and stealing!
It's time to stop the ‘blame game'!

Barack Obama is inheriting a very depressed economy that started in 60's. It's unfair it's
trickled down to taxpayers! Government must run like a business, if not, our children and
grandchildren will have absolutely no future! Permanent cuts are critical in government
spending, cutting salaries for politicians, and absolutely no bailouts or handouts!

Freddie, Fannie, AIG, and the Big 3 need to file Bankruptcy! If these high-dollar thieves really
believe the companies will succeed they need to go to bank, borrow the money and maybe,
they'll learn what it takes to run a successful company! Hopefully, bankruptcy might teach
them to cut extragavant lifestyles and their exorbitant salaries!

When the average person makes $10.00 to $22.50 per hour. Union workers make an average
of $50.00 to $100.00 plus benefits, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what went
wrong in the corporate world?

Taxpayers feel Barack Obama will stick to his words “he's going to cut programs until
America is free of debt.” Top priority should be ‘Fair Tax' and making sure it includes
property tax, so every person will be paying their fair share.

While I'm on a roll, why should we treat the illegitimate population with the best of homes,
clothes, schools, insurance, beds, food, tvs, just to name a few things? Isn't this unfair to all
our Military fighting for our great country! Something's definitely wrong with this picture!

Comment: #1
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:56 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
John Stossel
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 8 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 6 Feb 2016
diane dimond
Diane DimondUpdated 6 Feb 2016

19 Oct 2010 Public-Sector Unions Choke Taxpayers

21 Jul 2010 Immigrants -- Good or Bad?

6 Jan 2010 Who Is Wesley Mouch?