creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
23 May 2012
Keeping Business Honest

Instinctively, we look for people's motives. We need to know whom we can trust and whom we can't. We're … Read More.

16 May 2012
Making Life Fair

When my wife was a liberal, she complained that libertarian reasoning is coldhearted. Since markets produce … Read More.

9 May 2012
Creating a Risk-Free World

A child leaving home alone for the first time takes a risk. So does the entrepreneur who opens a new business.… Read More.

Ten Years After

Share Comment

After 9/11, the U.S. Congress created the Department of Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration. America went to war, overtly and covertly, in several countries. Nearly $8 trillion was spent on what is called "security," Chris Hellman of the National Priorities Project estimates.

Was it worth it?

Yes, in many ways, says author Ann Coulter. No, says Reason magazine editor Matt Welch.

There's no reason at all that the bureaucratization of security is going to make us any more safe," Welch said. "All we have to do is go on an airplane ... to see that there's a difference between security and security theater, between federalizing a problem and actually solving the problem."

Coulter thinks the government got lots of things right.

"Whatever liberals screamed bloody murder about was very important on the war on terrorism," she said. "I think Iraq was a crucial part ... ." Welch dissented.

"We're on the verge of bankruptcy. ... We are at the sort of tipping point of imperial overstretch."

Imperial overstretch? Welch has a point. Politicians talk about tight budgets, but National Defense Magazine recently ran this headline: "Homeland Security Market Is Vibrant Despite Budget Concerns." I fear this is the military-industrial complex President Eisenhower warned us about. Military contractors collude with politicians to keep the money flowing.

I blame the politicians. The contractors just do what they're supposed to do. The politicians are supposed to spend our money well. They don't.

After 9/11, the Senate voted 100 to zero to federalize airport security. Then-Sen. Tom Daschle said, "You can't professionalize if you don't federalize."

Nonsense. Before TSA was created, private contractors paid airport inspectors not much more than minimum wage. They weren't very good. Now we spend five times as much, and they're still not very good.

Today even the TSA knows that private security is better. In one of its own tests, its screeners in Los Angeles missed 75 percent of explosives planted by inspectors. In San Francisco, one of the few cities allowed to have privately managed security, screeners missed 20 percent.

In a reasonable world, the government would disband the TSA and move to a private competitive system.

But we live in a Big Government world.

Randolph Bourne, who opposed U.S. entry into World War I, said, "War is the health of the state." He meant that in war, government grows in power and prestige — and freedom shrinks. As Robert Higgs documents in "Crisis and Leviathan," government never recedes to its prewar dimensions.

Shortly after Sept. 11, Sen. Charles Schumer declared that the "era of a shrinking federal government is over." This was more nonsense. The government hadn't been shrinking. But for politicians like Schumer, 9/11 was an excuse to take more power. Price was no object.

I can't tell you what Homeland Security does with your money. Much of its spending is secret. Certainly much is wasted. The department made a big fuss over its color-coded airport security system, then scrapped it because it provided "little practical information." The department spent billions on things like special boats to protect a lake in Nebraska, all-terrain vehicles for a small town in Tennessee and 70 security cameras for a remote Alaskan village.

That's what politicians do. Members of Congress say: "You want my vote? You'd better give my district some cash." And when people are scared, they let bureaucrats spend.

This played into Osama bin Laden's hands. In one videotaped message, he talked about "bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy."

The attacks on 9/11 were largely a failure of government. Our so-called "intelligence agencies" knew nothing about the plot. The Immigration and Naturalization Service, charged with keeping track of foreigners who overstay their visas, didn't pay attention to the 19 hijackers. And as Rep. Ron Paul points out, history did not begin on Sept. 11. Part of the failure was America's interventionist foreign policy, which needlessly made enemies.

So government failed on 9/11, and yet the politicians' answer to failure is always the same: Give us more money and power. And we do. When will we learn?

John Stossel is host of "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of "Give Me a Break" and of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel, visit his site at <a href="http://www.johnstossel.com" <http://www.johnstossel.com>>johnstossel.com</a>. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Not to mention we can be groped and photographed through our clothes. TSA be damned. It's a giant waste of money and resources. Dr. Paul is so right. Our forefathers were non-interventionists and wrote into the constitution, "provide for the common defense". I don't think they meant the defense of the world or corporations doing business overseas with our enemies or in hostile places. The corporations could hire mercenaries if they choose to do business abroad.
Comment: #1
Posted by: sloopster3
Tue Sep 6, 2011 5:56 PM
I strongly believe all of this is about increasing the power of Washington politicians and enriching their friends. Thirty thousand people die on the highways every year. One tenth that many died on 9/11 and we spend 100 times as much trying to prevent terrorism. It certainly makes no financial sense. Even if we had 3000 people killed by terrorism every year it would small compared to highway deaths. People that think people like me want the terrorists to win are totally missing the point. The point is that we should be spending our scarce resources saving the most lives possible, not feeding the military machine or the homeland security machine because of illogical emotions.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Doug Lynn
Tue Sep 6, 2011 8:31 PM
Are you tired of spinning your wheels locally and getting NOWHERE??? Join the Liberty activists already making a difference in New Hampshire. (Shrinking NH Govt by 14% this year!!!) Google: Free State Project, then Google: Free Talk Live
Comment: #3
Posted by: PabloKoh
Wed Sep 7, 2011 8:24 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
John Stossel
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

17 Nov 2010 Natural Is Not Always Better

15 Jul 2009 Health-Care Competition

21 Oct 2009 A Nobel Prize for Showing That Freedom Works