creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
23 May 2012
Keeping Business Honest

Instinctively, we look for people's motives. We need to know whom we can trust and whom we can't. We're … Read More.

16 May 2012
Making Life Fair

When my wife was a liberal, she complained that libertarian reasoning is coldhearted. Since markets produce … Read More.

9 May 2012
Creating a Risk-Free World

A child leaving home alone for the first time takes a risk. So does the entrepreneur who opens a new business.… Read More.

Taxing the Rich

Share Comment

Progressives want to raise taxes on individuals who make more than $200,000 a year because they say it's wrong for the rich to be "given" more money. Sunday's New York Times carries a cartoon showing Uncle Sam handing money to a fat cat. They just don't get it.

As I've said before, a tax cut is not a handout. It simply means government steals less. What progressives want to do is take money from some — by force — and spend it on others. It sounds less noble when plainly stated.

That's the moral side of the matter. There's a practical side, too. Taxes discourage wealth creation. That hurts everyone, the lower end of the income scale most of all. An economy that, through freedom, encourages the production of wealth raises the living standards of lower-income people as well as everyone else.

A free society is not a zero-sum game in which every gain is offset by someone's loss. As long as government keeps its thumb off the scales, the "makers" who get rich do so by making others better off. (When the government allocates capital or creates barriers to competition, all bets are off.)

Of course, this is not the prevailing view among the intelligentsia. Columbia University Professor Marc Lamont Hill tells me, "Those who have more should pay more."

But is there a point where they stop producing wealth or leave altogether?

"The rich have always cried wolf like that," Hill says.

But the wolf is here. Maryland created a special tax on rich people that was supposed to bring in $106 million. Instead, the state lost $257 million.

Former Gov. Robert Ehrlich, who is running again for his old job, says: "It reminds me of Charlie Brown. Charlie Brown was always surprised when Lucy pulled the football away. And they're always surprised in Washington and state capitals when the dollars never come in."

Some of Maryland's rich left the state. "They're out of here. These people aren't stupid," Ehrlich says.

New York billionaire Tom Golisano isn't stupid, either. With $3,000 and one employee, he started a business that processes paychecks for companies. He created 13,000 jobs.

Then New York state hiked the income tax on millionaires.

"It was the straw that broke the camel's back," he says. "Not that I like to throw the number around, but my personal income tax last year would've been $13,800 a day. Would you like to write a check for $13,800 a day to a state government, as opposed to moving to another state where there's no state income tax or very low state income tax?

He established residence in Florida, which has no personal income tax.

Now Gov. David Paterson may have even seen the light.

"We projected that we would get $4 billion, and we actually got well short of it," he says.

Art Laffer, the economist who has a curve illustrating this point named after him, isn't surprised.

"It's just economics," he says. "People don't work to pay taxes. People work to get what they can after tax. They'll change where they earn their income. They'll change how they earn their income. They'll change how much they earn, when they receive the income. They'll change all of those things to minimize taxes."

We can see it in the statistics. In 1960, federal revenues were 18.6 percent of total output. Over the next 50 years, that percentage has rarely exceeded 20 percent or fallen below 17 percent. As Laffer says, people adjust their activities to the tax burden.

Donald Trump, who knows something about making money, says of course the rich will leave when hit with higher taxes. "I know these people," he told me. "They're international people. Whether they live here or live in a place like Switzerland doesn't really matter to them."

You haven't left, I told him.

"I haven't left yet. ... Look, the rich people are going to leave. And other people are going to leave. You're going to end up with lots of people that don't produce. And then that's the spiral. That's the end."

And that's another good reason for us to get on with reducing the size of government.

John Stossel is host of "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of "Give Me a Break" and of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel, visit his site at <a href="http://www.johnstossel.com" <http://www.johnstossel.com>>johnstossel.com</a>. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

??

??

??

??


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
I can count realy good up to one, If the fat cat gives 1 dollar to goverment in the form of taxes, That is one dollar that he can't give to me in the form of a raise or a bonus, So if the taxes go up on the rich it means that I will get less. ;(
Comment: #1
Posted by: MaD HaCkER
Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:05 PM
Three men went to dinner together, a rich man, a poor man and a middle class man. They each had the same meal, the finest food and drink fit for a King because at the end of the meal, they would get one check and each would contribute according to his means. At the end of the meal, the waiter brought the check. The poor man pulled out his wallet, and it was empty. The rich man forgot his wallet. Guess who paid the bill.
The only time we should go to the rich for help is when we're in trouble. We've turned asking into demanding and made it a way of life. This might seem fair to some, but it's simply not sound management. For those of us who don't have any place to hide when the going gets tough, it can be devestating. Interestingly, it is this vulnerable group that has the greatest electoral power and the most divided voice.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Phillip
Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:07 AM
I haven't met even one person who thinks its fair to extend tax cuts to only those making less than $250K. When I made $250K, prior to being disabled, I lived pay check to pay check, just like everyone else. I was a millionaire on paper only. It's all gone now.

United we stand, divided we fall. I wish someone would explain that to our current Administration.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Lauri W
Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:12 AM
I know that it may be a bit late for this comment, but...
I am a little tired of "rich" people who think that they should pay more taxes. What I hear them saying is that the government needs to pass a law to force them to do it. Seriously, if these people really think that they should give more of their personal wealth to the government, what's stopping them?
I've heard Warren Buffett say the same thing, but the simple fact is that when he decided to give his money away he gave it to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. If he really felt that he should pay more in taxes, why did he give his money to a charity? Why not just give it to the government? What was stopping him?
I'm sure, if there were legal hurdles to giving money to the feds Warren could have hired a room full of lawyers to help figure out how to get around it. But even he doesn't believe that the government would do a better job with his money and that's why he gave it to a PRIVATE charity.
So, get off the hypocritical high-horse all you "rich" people who would "gladly" pay more in taxes but need to be forced to do it. You're not fooling anyone...
Rob
Comment: #4
Posted by: Rob
Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:10 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
John Stossel
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

3 Jun 2009 Pay for Your Own Rescue

26 Oct 2011 School Competition Rescues Kids

17 Nov 2010 Natural Is Not Always Better