creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
23 May 2012
Keeping Business Honest

Instinctively, we look for people's motives. We need to know whom we can trust and whom we can't. We're … Read More.

16 May 2012
Making Life Fair

When my wife was a liberal, she complained that libertarian reasoning is coldhearted. Since markets produce … Read More.

9 May 2012
Creating a Risk-Free World

A child leaving home alone for the first time takes a risk. So does the entrepreneur who opens a new business.… Read More.

Students Who Get It!

Share Comment

I went to Princeton in 1969, where they taught me that government could solve the world's problems. Put the smartest people in a room, give them enough taxpayer money, and they will fix most everything. During those years, I heard nothing about an alternative.

How things have changed!

I recently spent time with several hundred college-aged people at a Students for Liberty conference in Washington, D.C. Here were hundreds of students who actually understand that government creates many of the problems, and freedom — personal and economic liberty — makes things better.

I appeared at the conference along with David Boaz of the Cato Institute. Here are some highlights.

Karina Zannat, a student at American University in Washington, D.C., said, "A lot of my professors seem to think that even when politicians spend money in seemingly wasteful ways, we should be OK with it because every dollar spent is one dollar that goes toward income for an American citizen."

This is a common canard known as the "broken window" fallacy. The 19th-century French free-market writer Frederic Bastiat exposed it with the story of a boy who breaks a shop window, prompting some townspeople to look at the bright side: fixing the window will stimulate economic activity in the town. The fallacy, of course, is that had the window not been broken, the shopkeeper would have spent the money in more productive ways.

People often commit this fallacy — have a look at what's being written in the wake of Japan's tsunami.

Meg Patrick of George Mason University asked about the Austrian business cycle theory. How delightful to meet a student interested in that! This is Ludwig von Mises and F.A. Hayek's argument that when government inflates the money supply and holds down interest rates to create an economic boom, a bust, or recession, must follow because the prosperity is built on an artificial foundation.

Meg wanted to know if "the injection of fiscal stimulus into the economy (after the bust) disrupts the signals necessary to fix the current problem."

To which I replied: Sure does. The market is signaling that certain changes are needed, but stimulus spending interferes with those signals.

If businesses are not allowed to fail, we don't get the market feedback we need.

David Boaz added: "If you get drunk, you have a hangover. I'm sure some of you have tried the theory: just keep drinking. But you can't keep drinking forever."

Ian Downie from the University of Virginia had a good question about spending: "Our congressional representatives have huge incentives to steal the wealth from the vast majority of the country and funnel it down to their constituents. What kind of systematic changes can we make to stop this perverse incentive machine?"

"The special interests are always there," Boaz said. "The challenge is to get the public interest — the taxpayers — to stick around after the election, to keep putting pressure on. And that is very difficult."

He went on to say we need constitutional limits on what government can do. We tried that, of course, but too many insiders have an incentive to interpret the limits so broadly that they are hardly limits at all. So government grows.

Grant Babcock, from the University of Pittsburgh, raised a good point: "If government grows in response to crises, what do we do? It seems like there is always another crisis on the horizon. It used to be international communism. Nowadays ... it's the threat of Islamist fundamentalism. ... Are we trapped?"

The media do keep inventing new crises. The global-warming crisis, the swine flu crisis, the pesticide crisis.

"The running-out-of-oil crisis," Boaz added.

Crisis is a friend of the state.

As Boaz pointed out, however, "sometimes there are crises that cause countries to go ... toward less government. New Zealand hit a crisis like that, and they actually reformed their economy. So there's at least the hope that the next crisis in the United States or Europe will cause people to say: 'This hasn't been working. We have to cut back.'"

After spending time with those students, I feel better about the future of America.

John Stossel is host of "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of "Give Me a Break" and of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel, visit his site at <a href="http://www.johnstossel.com" <http://www.johnstossel.com>>johnstossel.com</a>. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Dear Stossel,
Cato's David Boaz was unfair and I say untruthful when he discribed the Tea Party individuals. He told the students that the Tea Party were Fiscal Conservatives-True, the Tea Party wants to say what people can and can not do with their bodies-untrue and unfair. The Tea Party is made-up of more than just being Fiscal Responsible, that is just one issue. I do not believe David Boaz knows what he is talking about when he speaks to who and what the Tea Party stands for; he needs to do his homework first before he speaks to young and Impressionable people. Students as whole have not had much life experience and are open to many ideas and should be given the truth, the whole truth and not just one's opinion dressed as the truth.
Sincerely, Linda L Hill, an American Citizen and a Tea Party Member

PS I do appreciate your programs to help educate
Comment: #1
Posted by: Linda L Hill
Fri Apr 1, 2011 3:25 PM
Dear Stossel,
Also, the comments Cato's David Boaz made about Mike Huckabee were demeaning and untrue. Again, he did not do his homework regarding who Mike Huckabee is and what he is about. I do not always agree with Mike Huckabee, but as far as, his Patriotism and Love of our County can not be dismissed. I did not hear this come from David Boaz. Again, I must say, that if David Boaz is going to speak to anyone about Mike Huckabee he must be truthful; he was not. He only spoke from his opinion, not the truth.
Sincerely, Linda L Hill, an American Citizen and a Patriot who Loves America
Comment: #2
Posted by: Linda L Hill
Fri Apr 1, 2011 3:40 PM
@ Linda Hill
I agree with you regarding both of your posts. Tea party is a mixed group made up of various groups and various people. Most would agree on the fiscal issues and would go different ways on all other issues. Besides, which group has gotten most of the power and changes made, the tea party has because they are a big group, and libertarians have been part of the tea party, and tea party and conservatives list cato institute along with heritage, etc. we are open-minded and wise enough to know we can learn from all of them.

As to the Huckabee thing, I cringed. I understood Boaz's, but he could have made the same point without making fun of Huckabee's religion or God. There are a lot of religious libertarians. He could have just made the point that Huckabee or some other religious conservatives don't believe in govt control of people unless its regarding their religious beliefs, he did make that point but he had to jab at Huckabee's religion and God first.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Juanita Estrada
Mon Apr 4, 2011 1:05 AM
Re: Linda L Hill
Right on Lady!
Comment: #4
Posted by: Juanita Estrada
Mon Apr 4, 2011 1:06 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
John Stossel
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

2 Feb 2011 I Can Balance the Budget

6 Jun 2007 Why Is Profit a Dirty Word?

23 Jan 2008 A Freer World is a Better World