creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
3 Feb 2010
Big Government's Cronies

Many window-making companies struggle because of the recession's effect on home building. But one little … Read More.

27 Jan 2010
A Blow for Free Speech

From the commentary in the mainstream media, I thought there had been a coup d'etat in Washington. The New … Read More.

20 Jan 2010
Who Needs Energy Independence?

When you gas up your car, do you think that you're doing something evil? After all, I'm told that burning … Read More.

Sell The Roads!

Under President Obama's stimulus plan, the government will spend billions of your dollars building new roads and fixing old ones. They say they'll do it efficiently. I say, bull; government has never before been efficient. It isn't going to start now.

Need proof? How about rush hour?

Rush hours from hell are not natural phenomena. They're manmade — more precisely, politician-made. But what if commuting didn't have to be a horrendous experience? What if, for example, someone wanted to add some lanes to a road or build an entirely new road?

It's happening. Private road builders are doing it. They built a double-decker underground highway in Paris. A 45-minute trip now takes 10 minutes. Three hundred-fifty cameras watch for traffic delays or accidents. Once the camera detects a problem, a crew rushes to tow the obstacle away so traffic keeps moving.

They did a similar thing in California, too, on Highway 91. Instead of building a brand-new road, a private developer added two lanes in the median strip of an existing highway. The beauty of it: Unlike government work, the private highway is all voluntary. No driver or taxpayer was forced to pay for the extra lanes. Drivers can choose to use them or not. Those who want to go faster have to pay a toll — from a buck fifty to $9 — depending on traffic. By paying you save time. And for some people, time is money.

The success of private roads made politicians from other states want to try leasing roads. Mayor Richard Daley did it with the Chicago Skyway. Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels leased the Indiana toll road to a private company.

"We received $4 billion, free and clear, no taxes, no debt left to our kids," Daniels told me for my ABC special "Bailouts and Bull" (http://tinyurl.com/bjsl9q).

But many people are horrified by the idea of leasing roads to businesses. When Florida considered leasing Alligator Alley, the highway that spans Florida from east to west, people held protests and screamed about the evil of corporate profit. Politicians shelved the idea.

The governor of New Jersey gave up, too.

A private highway is dying in Pennsylvania and dead in Texas.

"Privatizing existing taxpayer infrastructure is not a solution for anybody," Congressman Peter DeFazio of Oregon told me.

He also says that what Gov. Daniels did is wrong.

Daniels made money for the taxpayer. What's wrong with that? I asked DeFazio.

"Money that the people of Indiana could have had in the future is going to go to a private company."

"What money?" Daniels asks. "The toll road was losing money!"

If Indiana couldn't make money running the toll road, how can a private company do it?

"Your first insurance that they're going to run a better road than the politicians did is, if they don't, people won't drive on it, and they'll lose a lot of money. They have every incentive to make traffic flow swiftly, to make that drive as pleasant and safe as possible."

Private owners also have an incentive to maintain the road. Bureaucracies let the highways decay. Why did it take a recession to get them thinking about repairs?

DeFazio disagrees: "If you have toll roads, the toll authority, if properly run, can meet all of those requirements."

But do they?

"I can't account for the crummy government in Indiana or Pennsylvania. They could run them better. They could run them just as well as the private sector because the private sector runs it well and makes a profit."

But that's exactly the point! Profit management beats government management every time.

"When government runs things, it's a monopoly, and it has no competition, and there's no upside to doing a lot better job," Daniels says. "That's why we didn't have, until this new situation, electronic tolling. People were still stopping, chucking quarters into baskets. Politicians never run things well."

Why then do some congressman say you shouldn't sell public highways? Gov. Daniels has an answer:

"There are people, frankly, in Congress, who can't abide the thought that you might be able to pay for something without going down there and kissing their ring for the money."

John Stossel is co-anchor of ABC News' "20/20" and the author of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.



Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment

John Stossel, I just moved to Tacoma, WA and the roads are horrible. Please do a report here on why the reads are crap, haven't been painted, looks crummy overall. I think I know why and the state I heard is cutting funds for road work. Even in nearby cities of Lakewood, Ft Lewis, they need to fix it. Thanks for great reporting.

Comment: #1
Posted by: Jim May
Fri Apr 3, 2009 1:25 PM

Politicians want infrastructures, new visions! They've admitted these are temporary solutions. Without manufacturing jobs, we don't need infrastructures? These manufacturing jobs helped people pay taxes, buy houses, cars, and kept the economy rolling. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out Nafta and Cafta played a huge role in the downfall of America! Folks, the Change, Taxpayers expected, that have a job at present, 'ain't gonna happen' unless you let the politicians know you're fed up with their deceit and greed! Taxpayers, of all races, just thought they were fed up with the Bush Administration! Obama convinced voters he was the man for President, so in next few months, let's see how he handles economy and stops doing radical things that's costing trillions!" Americas' debt would have been drastically reduced from Obamas' two years of campaigning! Promising to redistribute wealth isn't the answer! Raising taxes on highest income earners who are private business owners won't create jobs! During these depressed times, this will accomplish the socialists' goals. Socialist and Radical changes will haunt America forever! Taxpayers, of all races, should have put an end to 'social and welfare programs', numerous committees and boards. The following shows how socialist and radical programs took place. 1977 - Community Reinvestment Act. Carter admininstration. The Democratic Congress intimidated banks into making sub-prime loans to high-risk buyers. People living off social and welfare programs shouldn't have been pushed into buying the American dream without working for it. 2000-2008 - Frank, Meeks, Waters, Dodd, Reid, Clinton, Pelosi, (naming a few) stating "We don't have a crisis. Nothings' wrong with Freddie/Fannie!" They continue to cover mess up! Raines, Howard, and Johnson were some of their buddies that walked away with 20-90 million dollar parachutes! Was this a windfall or what? From 1970 until 2009, the automakers continued 'producing lots of cars'! The plastic cars cost a fortune. Maintenance and repairs are huge. Didn't the automakers, politicians, insurance companies and others that profited ever stop to think about America's future? Who profited besides the plastic manufacturers? While I'm on a roll, it's time for AIG, Freddie, Fannie, several banks, GM, Chrysler, and others taking Taxpayers money, to file bankruptcy, as they need to learn how to run a private business, thus stopping the politicians from taking control. Politicians have some nerve saying that 'stronger government regulatory power is essential and broader powers are needed by them?' Taxpayers would be fools to let this happen after what's happened to America! You're not entitled to any power! Just think, Obama is now stating 'maybe, his new spending of almost another four trillions will be partially paid off by 2012!' With What? Oh, I almost forgot, 2012 is election year!

Comment: #2
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Sun Apr 5, 2009 10:45 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:
Creators.com comments policy
More
John Stossel
Feb. `10
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 9 Feb 2010
William Murchison
William MurchisonUpdated 9 Feb 2010
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 9 Feb 2010

7 Nov 2007 With Government Money Come Strings

16 Dec 2009 Free Stuff From Sam

6 Jan 2010 Who Is Wesley Mouch?