creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
26 Nov 2014
Thanks, Property Rights!

This Thanksgiving, I give thanks for something our forebears gave us: property rights. People associate … Read More.

19 Nov 2014
Control Freaks

Control freaks want to run your life. They call themselves "public servants." But whether student council president,… Read More.

12 Nov 2014
Democracy Delusions

When the Berlin Wall came down 25 years ago this week, people in the Soviet Bloc gained something even more … Read More.

Same as the Old Boss?

Comment

Last year, I reported that the United States fell from sixth to eighth place — behind Canada — in the Heritage Foundation/Wall Street Journal's 2010 Index of Economic Freedom. Now, we've fallen further. In the just-released 2011 Index, the United States is in ninth place. That's behind Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, Canada, Ireland and Denmark.

The biggest reason for the continued slide? Spending as a percentage of gross domestic product. (State and local spending is not counted.)

The debt picture is dismal, too. We are heading into Greece's territory.

Are we doomed? Not necessarily. Economist David R. Henderson points out that our neighbors to the north faced a similar crisis. In 1994, the debt that Canada owed to investors was 67 percent of GDP. Today, it's less than 30 percent.

What did Canada do? It cut spending from 17.5 percent of GDP to 11.3 percent.

This wasn't merely a cut in the growth of spending, a favorite trick of congressional committees. These were actual reductions in absolute spending.

"If a cabinet minister wanted a smaller cut in one program, he had to come up with a bigger cut in another program," writes Henderson in "Canada's Budget Triumph," published by the Mercatus Center. All but one of Canada's 22 federal departments experienced real cuts in spending. While Canada raised taxes slightly, spending was cut six to seven times more.

These supposedly painful cuts didn't cause terrible pain. In fact, there was much more gain than pain. Unemployment dropped, the economy boomed, and the Canadian dollar — then worth about 71 cents U.S. — today is about equal to the American dollar.

If Canada can do it, we can, too. But the signs aren't good. New Speaker John Boehner, leader of the Republicans who now control the House, says he wants to cut spending. When he was sworn in last week, he declared: "Our spending has caught up with us. ... No longer can we kick the can down the road."

But when NBC anchorman Brian Williams asked him to name a program "we could do without," he said, "I don't think I have one off the top of my head."

Give me a break! You mean to tell me the Republican leader in the House doesn't already know what he wants to cut? I don't know which is worse — that he doesn't have a list or that he won't talk about it in public.

The Republicans say they'll start by cutting $100 billion, but let's put that in perspective. The budget is close to $4 trillion. So $100 billion is just 2.5 percent. That's shooting too low. Firms in the private sector make cuts like that all the time. It's considered good business — pruning away deadwood.

GOP leaders say the source of their short-run cuts will be discretionary non-security spending. They foolishly exclude entitlement spending, which Congress puts on autopilot, and all spending for national and homeland security (whether it's necessary or not). That leaves only $520 billion.

So even if the Republicans managed to cut all discretionary non-security spending (which is not what they plan), the deficit would still be $747 billion. (The deficit is now projected to be $1.267 trillion.)

This is a revolution? Republicans will have to learn that there is no budget line labeled "waste, fraud, abuse." If they are serious about cutting government, they will ax entire programs, departments and missions.

I'm not confident they have it in them. I hope I'm wrong, but they're politicians, after all. I'm reminded of Spencer Abraham. When he was a senator, he sponsored a bill to abolish the Department of Energy. But then George W. Bush appointed him to head the department. Suddenly, he saw the importance of the Energy Department. "I changed my mind after Congress passed legislation in 2000 reorganizing the department," Abraham explained to his former Senate colleagues. Yeah, yeah.

That's why I fear that the new Congress will soon remind me of that line by the Who: "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss."

John Stossel is host of "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of "Give Me a Break" and of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel, visit his site at <a href="http://www.johnstossel.com" <http://www.johnstossel.com>>johnstossel.com</a>. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM



Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
I am an avid follower of American politics even though as a Canadian,I do so as an outsider.
It seems to me that if both Democrats and Republics actually cared for the future of the country and their children rather then their own short sighted political ambitions,they would come together on this issue and both sacrifice.
Here is a list of ways to get the debt under control:
1)Leave tax rates where they are but end most of the deductions in the tax code at the same time simplifying the tax system.
2)Cut discretionary spending by 10% but feeze it until the books are balanced.
3Feeze military and homeland security spending at current levels until the books are balanced.
4)Cut corporate taxes to 25% but eliminate all subsidies. Governments should never pick winners and losers.
5)Gradually increase the age by which one is eligible for Medicare and Government pensions (including government workers) by one month per year,so that in 15 years one becomes eligible at age 66.5.
6)Set a system in place where once unemployemnet reach a certain level(say 7%) a young workers program is put in place. These would be visas for skilled immigrants younger than 35 where they could come,work and be fast tracked to citizenship. The increase in immigration would lower the per capita debt and also help fund the baby boomers who are entering retirement.
7)Set in motion an end to illegal immigration. The border will never be secure,what needs to be done is to stop providing for people who are in the USA illegally. This means denying illegal immigrants access to health care,education and employement. Without a job and these benefits,there would be no reason for illegals to come to the country.
These would no be draconian increases to taxes or cuts to government spending but would allow the revenue side of the ledger to catch up with the expenditure side over time and would force government to reallocate dollars from non performing services to key ones.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Rick Taylor
Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:13 AM
Rick,

Your plan makes entirely too much sense. Unfortunately, our legidlators are crippled by partisan gridlock. It is really too bad that our legislators are so feckless.

Magrum Yuff
Comment: #2
Posted by: Magrum Yuff
Sun Jan 16, 2011 4:01 PM
Rick,
Your plan makes entirely too much sense. Unfortunately, our legislators are crippled by partisan gridlock. It is unfortunate that our legislators are so feckless.
Magrum Yuff
Comment: #3
Posted by: Magrum Yuff
Sun Jan 16, 2011 4:03 PM
Love it! Finally found Stossel on the net. What? Your word processor thinks Stossel is mis spelled?
Comment: #4
Posted by: Joseph W. Dalzell
Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:21 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
John Stossel
Nov. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 1 Dec 2014
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 29 Nov 2014
Newspaper ContributorsUpdated 28 Nov 2014

12 Jun 2013 Terror and Safety

3 Apr 2013 Green Tyranny

21 Mar 2012 What Is Fair?