creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
22 May 2013
Sublet My People Go

My kids moved out! I have two empty rooms in my apartment. Maybe I can rent them? A tourist visiting New York … Read More.

15 May 2013
True Grit

Are you a real man (or woman)? Do you have "grit"? Compare yourself to the man on the $20 bill: … Read More.

8 May 2013
Live Free or Move

Forty-three million Americans moved from one state to another between 1995 and 2010 — about one-seventh … Read More.

Money Is Not What Schools Need

Comment

U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan recently claimed: "Districts around the country have literally been cutting for five, six, seven years in a row. And, many of them, you know, are through, you know, fat, through flesh and into bone ... ."

Really? They cut spending five to seven consecutive years?

Give me a break!

Andrew Coulson, director of the Cato Institute's Center for Educational Freedom, writes that out of 14,000 school districts in the United States, just seven have cut their budgets seven years in a row. How about five years in a row? Just 87. That's a fraction of 1 percent in each case.

Duncan may be pandering to his constituency, or he may actually be fooled by how school districts (and other government agencies) talk about budget cuts. When normal people hear about a budget cut, we assume the amount of money to be spent is less than the previous year's allocation. But that's not what bureaucrats mean.

"They are not comparing current year spending to the previous year's spending," Coulson writes. "What they're doing is comparing the approved current year budget to the budget that they initially dreamed about having."

So if a district got more money than last year but less than it asked for, the administrators consider it a cut. "Back in the real world, a K-12 public education costs four times as much as it did in 1970, adjusting for inflation: $150,000 versus the $38,000 it cost four decades ago (in constant 2009 dollars)," Coulson says.

Taxpayers need to understand this sort thing just to protect themselves from greedy government officials and teachers unions.

It was on the basis of this fear and ignorance that President Obama got Congress to pass a "stimulus" bill this summer that included $10 billion for school districts. The money is needed desperately to save teachers from layoffs, the bill's advocates said. We must do it for the children!

When you look at the facts, the scam is clear.

"Over the past 40 years," Coulson writes, "public school employment has risen 10 times faster than enrollment.

There are 9 percent more students today, but nearly twice as many public school employees."

But isn't it just common sense that schools would be better if they had more money? As a wise man said, it's not what we don't know that gets us into trouble; it's what we know that isn't so.

Consider the American Indian Public Charter School in Oakland, Calif. It was once a failing school, but now it's one of the best in California. Ben Chavis turned it around without any additional money. His book, "Crazy Like a Fox," tells how.

Chavis' experience exposes the school establishment's lies for what they are. Nearly all of Chavis' students are considered economically disadvantaged (98 percent qualify for free lunches), yet they have the fourth-highest test scores of any school in the state.

"In Oakland this year, on the AP (advanced placement) exam, we had 100 percent of all the blacks and Mexicans in the city of Oakland who passed AP calculus," Chavis said. "There are four high schools, and we're the only ones who had anyone pass AP calc."

Yet Chavis accomplishes this without the "certified" teachers so revered by the educational establishment. His classes are as big as, and sometimes bigger than, public school classes, but only a quarter of his teachers are certified by the state.

Money, he insists, is not the answer. "My buildings are shacks compared to their schools, but my schools are clean, and we'll kick all their asses."

He scoffs at the establishment's solutions to the education problem, such as teacher evaluations.

"I don't do no teacher evaluations. All I do is go into a class, and if the kids ain't working, your ass is fired. (Most principals) sit for hours and say, 'Is he meeting this goal, is he meeting' — I just go to class, and if the kids are not working ..."

It's time we threw out the "experts" and exposed the schools to real competition by people with common sense.

John Stossel is host of "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of "Give Me a Break" and of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel, visit his site at <a href="http://www.johnstossel.com" <http://www.johnstossel.com>>johnstossel.com</a>. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM



Comments

9 Comments | Post Comment
I'd love to see more "uncertified" teachers with real enthusiasm leading in the classrooms.

I have to call out Andrew Coulson on one statistic, though. The number of teachers may have outpaced the kids by 10:1, but many of those teachers are "para-educators" who are hired to teach special needs kids. In some cases, there are only 2 kids per teacher, depending on how special their needs are.

This trend has only been in place for the past decade or so, thanks to "outraged" parents who need a break from their kids during the day, and want the same public education that other kids get. Should they get that education? I think so, but that's where the biggest growth in teachers has come from. If teachers really outpaced students by 10:1 in the last 40 years, then we must have had 300 kids per classroom back then. Better check those facts again, Andy.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Ryan R.
Wed Sep 15, 2010 11:44 AM
I agree with you that the regular form of education we are used to is very misguided. Why don't we as a nation have more support for vocational education? Aren't there enough unemployed or under employed college graduates? What is wrong with our young people learnnig how to make a decent living? i have been teaching vocational education for fourteen years and a great percentage of my students have gone on to make a very comfortable living. They constantly out perform there counterparts at the home schools in both graduation rates and test scores. young people today are constantly told they can't do well if they don't go to college, well befor I started teaching I made a very good living repairing all the doctors, lawyers and engineers vehicles. I had to go to college in order to teach but as both a teacher, and a working guy at heart I know there is at least one better form of education than we are now forced to finance. I would like to see the people better support vocational education, some of the most well off people I know are electritions, plumbers, mechanics,collision techs and carpenters.
Comment: #2
Posted by: tom struebing
Wed Sep 15, 2010 4:12 PM
Not taking any sides here, but there are a couple of things that should be considered. The cost comparison began in 1970, slightly before PL 94-142, or idea-individuals with disabilities education act. When you talk about spending 12K per year per student, you are talking about averages. A 'typical' student would be much less than that 12K. A student with a disability may cost 4, 5 or even 10 times that amount (or not). Federal law requires that each of these students are given a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment. That may mean one teacher and an assistant along with a nurse, or more in a self-contained classroom. It may also mean expensive equipment. This was not a requirement in 1970, and has had a significant impact on spending. In addition, things like technology were not a part of the landscape 40 years ago. Once again, not taking sides, but the requirements that have been placed on the public schools have increased dramatically also. While spending has gone up, it is not necessarily due to wasteful spending and the like, but also due to increased mandates.
Comment: #3
Posted by: G.
Thu Sep 16, 2010 10:03 PM
Your show last night took some cheap shots, and some good shots, and our public education system. But in the end I am reminded of why public education costs a lot more than private schools or "special schools" as one of your presenters represented last night.
I am currently buying long term care insurance for myself and my wife. When reviewing the plans I found that one group that I'm in (retired federal employees) costs almost twice as much as a private plan (USAA). I had to ask "Why?" The reponse - "Oh, the federal plan has to take all retired federal employees, regardless of their health." The USAA plan only takes "healthy" people.
Well, public education is the same. They can't pick and choose their students; they have to take them all - the good with the bad. And that costs more money.
Paul Hickey
Augusta, GA
p.s. My wife is a 6th grade teacher with 125 kids each day. I'll bet she works harder than you do for a lot less money.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Paul Hickey
Fri Sep 17, 2010 2:05 PM
I taught only briefly in the public schools after having taught and administered in a private school before becoming a civil service teacher in the employ of the CA Department of Developmental Services, which operated the state hospitals for the Mentally Retarded. A portion of my time in the public schools was spent as a substitute teacher, which gave me a good overview of the system.
Public schools have become top-heavy in administrative staff. An elementary school generally had a Principal, two Assistant Principals, and Nursing and Psychological and Psychometric staff. In the classroom a teacher rarely saw any of the administrative staff.
This markedly contrasts with civil service teachers. Let me note immediately that credentialing requirements for both were the same. Salaries rose more rapidly in civil service, but topped out earlier. When I became Assistant Chief, Central Program Services (Educational) effectively Principal, I supervised a school for the retarded and mentally ill; one for the Mentally Disordered Sex Offenders and the Criminally Insane and coordinated programs with the local public school; Adult Education and the local junior college. I alone administered a twenty-six million dollar budget. That's the way it was done. I was not exceptional.
More can be accomplished with fewer administrative staff and one administrator usually costs at least one and one half times a teacher's salary, so a greater number of teachers could be hired, reducing class size.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Norman D Weibel
Fri Sep 17, 2010 5:34 PM
Why does it cost 3 times as much or more for a student to be educated at a public school than at a private school? We could save a ton of money and close the department of education, fire all the school employees and give the properties to private schools. We could pay them what they charge now for education and cut our costs 300% And our kids would get a better education to boot. The best question is why I have to think of this. Why doesn't our leadership think of this. Or are they so corrupt that they don't think of our kids education but only to support the unions.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Breck Shortley
Sat Sep 18, 2010 10:43 AM
More money is not the answer to solving problems in our military or national security, either. Talk about spending over-kill. When's that editorial coming-out? Damn, you'd save tons of money, offset deficits the most, by dramatically cutting in those 2 wasteful areas. Then we could spend more money on people things like health care and education. Your priorities are out of whack.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Albert Colone
Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:15 AM
I find it ironic that some school district complain about money issues, but continue to hire administrators and build new facilities. In the real world, when sensible people have little money, they cut spending and fire people who are unnecessary and don't perform as they should. I would love to see the public schools do those things, but they won't. Oh well, I can dream can't I.
Comment: #8
Posted by: Damon Townsend
Wed Oct 6, 2010 5:17 PM
have you seen the facilities that are being built at our expense? Newton Massachusetts and LA? They think they have an ATM card and it is YOU. Here's the deal: I went to Catholic grammar school and the went to public high school. I was a grade ahead of the students. More money won't solve the problem. Get teachers that have skin in the game. Unions are bad. They want to work less and have $100k salaries, with presidential benefits. Administration is killing us. You don't need an assistant of third principal. Get the Unions out and offer a voucher and the American spirit will prevail. Also, follow success stories such as this story; it will get others to follow.
Comment: #9
Posted by: jaxon
Wed Oct 6, 2010 9:19 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
John Stossel
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 27 May 2013
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 25 May 2013
diane dimond
Diane DimondUpdated 25 May 2013

4 May 2011 Gasoline and Onions

1 Oct 2008 Regulator Bullies

22 Sep 2010 The Battle for the Future