creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
8 Feb 2012
Government Can't Make Us Happy

In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson called the pursuit of happiness an unalienable right. … Read More.

1 Feb 2012
Policing the World

With an election approaching and at least some Americans upset about irresponsible spending, the president … Read More.

25 Jan 2012
The Real State of the Union

Has Barack Obama learned nothing in three years? During his State of the Union address, he promised "a … Read More.

Keep Your Laws Off My Body

Share Comment

"It's a free country."

That's a popular saying — and true in many ways. But for a free country, America does ban a lot of things that are perfectly peaceful and consensual. Why is that?

Here are some things you can't do in most states of the union: rent your body to someone for sex, sell your kidney, take recreational drugs. The list goes on. I'll discuss American prohibitions tomorrow night at 8 and 11 p.m. Eastern time (and again on Friday at 10) on my Fox Business program.

The prohibitionists say their rules are necessary for either the public's or the particular individual's own good. I'm skeptical. I think of what Albert Camus said: "The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants." Prohibition is force. I prefer persuasion. Government force has nasty unintended consequences.

I would think that our experience with alcohol prohibition would have taught America a lesson. Nearly everyone agrees it was a disaster. It didn't stop people from drinking, but it created new and vicious strains of organized crime. Drug prohibition does that now.

The prohibitionists claim that today's drugs are far more dangerous than alcohol.

But is that true? Or is much of what you think you know ... wrong?

I believed the Drug Enforcement Administration's claim that drugs like crack and meth routinely addict people on first use.

But Jacob Sullum, who wrote "Saying Yes" (http://tinyurl.com/yjxru4s), says, "If you look at the government's own data about patterns of drug use, it clearly is not true."

The data is remarkable: 8.5 million Americans have tried crack, but there are only 359,000 regular users. (The government defines "regular use" as using a drug at least once in the past 30 days.) More than 12 million tried meth, but only 314,000 still take it. The story is similar for heroin. Most people who try these "instantly additive drugs" do not get "hopelessly addicted." They give them up on their own.

As Sullum puts it: "The vast majority of people who use illegal drugs do not become heavy users, do not become addicts; it does not disrupt their lives.

In fact, I would argue it enhances their lives. How do we know that? Because they use it."

But on the news, we constantly see people whose lives have been destroyed by drugs. Sullum says: "When you have prohibition, the most visible users are the ones who are most antisocial, most screwed up. They're the ones who come to the attention of the police. ... People who present themselves as experts on drug use because they come into contact with all these addicts have a very skewed perspective because they are seeing a biased sample. The people who are well adjusted, responsible users are invisible."

My prohibition show will also touch on prostitution. I want ratings — I admit it. Former prosecutor Wendy Murphy says prostitution is "sexual slavery."

I think calling it slavery is an insult to those who've suffered real slavery. Slavery is force. Prostitution is consensual. On my show, I'll let a former "sex worker" and the prosecutor fight it out.

The prohibitionists also ban the sale of human organs. You aren't allowed to sell a kidney to someone who will die without one. Sally Satel, a physician who is the recipient of a kidney and the author of "When Altruism Isn't Enough" (http://tinyurl.com/yzjnksw), says, "Altruism ... is a beautiful virtue, but tomorrow at this time 13 people will be dead because they didn't get a kidney."

In a free country, we consenting adults should be able to do whatever we want with our bodies as long as we don't hurt anyone else. People who don't like what we do have every right to complain about our behavior, to boycott, to picket, to embarrass us. Bless the critics. They make us better people by getting us to think about what's moral. Let them mock and shame. But shaming is one thing — government force is another. Prohibition means we empower the state to send out people with guns to force people to do what the majority says is moral. That's not right.

And it doesn't even work.

John Stossel is host of "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of "Give Me a Break" and of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel, visit his site at <a href="http://www.johnstossel.com" <http://www.johnstossel.com>>johnstossel.com</a>. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

6 Comments | Post Comment
Recreational drugs will never be legalized because it's more profitable for the dealers and the feds to keep drugs underground.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Pat Riley
Wed Mar 3, 2010 8:16 AM
Stossel makes a good point. It's typical that people, whether sincere or sinister, will confiscate your freedoms (and money) in the name of helping society!

Rec drugs and prostitution won't be made legal because of the widespread sentiment that's it's immoral and dangerous. Doesn't matter if you compare alcoholic's stats with drug's stats. There's a huge mountain to climb to get people to think differently. But imagine the amount of crime associated with the current domestic drug trade that might be eliminated. Drug crimes are not just confined to the users and dealers, but many home robberies, muggings, and murders are driven by the need for drug money.
Comment: #2
Posted by: NH reader
Wed Mar 3, 2010 9:51 AM
ATTENTION! John Stossel, and everyone else who might read this.

Search Rick Simpson on youtube.
Cannabis cures cancer
Comment: #3
Posted by: dustin s
Sat Mar 6, 2010 2:05 PM
Re: Pat Riley

Not to mention the profits of the drug companies. They fund many of the "studies" that show how "dangerous" drugs like marijuana are. Because they don't want competition from something you can grow in your back yard.
Comment: #4
Posted by: glashoppah
Mon Mar 8, 2010 11:14 PM
Stossel wants to legalize pot and prostitution and polygamy.
With all respect he has the morals of Satan and he needs Christ badly.
Dane Muhlig
Comment: #5
Posted by: dane muhlig
Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:56 AM
Just watched Megyn Kelly interview Assemblyman Ortiz of NY. I would suggest tha if he wants to control what people eat he go back to wherever he came from that makes English his second language and go into politics there-I am sure he would even be given a gun and a car inorder to go house to house and terrorize the citizens, but since they are used to it, they won't care. In fact, they might even offer to give him some homemade cardboard cookies or tortillas...If you come to this country because of the freedoms, don't change it-enjoy it and do your own thing, letting me do mine! (This, by the way, fits one one of the definition of a liberal-"I don't like it so NO ONE should have it"!
Comment: #6
Posted by: Joy
Fri Mar 19, 2010 11:09 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
John Stossel
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 13 Feb 2012
Bill O'Reilly
Bill O'ReillyUpdated 11 Feb 2012
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 11 Feb 2012

6 May 2009 Steroids Hysteria

3 Dec 2008 Government Sets Us Up for the Next Bust

4 Jan 2012 Ideas Have Sex, and We're Better for It