creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
23 May 2012
Keeping Business Honest

Instinctively, we look for people's motives. We need to know whom we can trust and whom we can't. We're … Read More.

16 May 2012
Making Life Fair

When my wife was a liberal, she complained that libertarian reasoning is coldhearted. Since markets produce … Read More.

9 May 2012
Creating a Risk-Free World

A child leaving home alone for the first time takes a risk. So does the entrepreneur who opens a new business.… Read More.

Free to Choose

Share Comment

America's current struggles notwithstanding, life here is pretty good. We have a standard of living that's the envy of most of the world.

Why did that happen? Prosperity isn't the norm. Throughout history and throughout the world, poverty has been the norm. Most of the world still lives in dire poverty. Of the 6 billion people on earth, perhaps 1 billion have something close to our standard of living. Why did America prosper when most of the people of the world are still poor?

Milton Friedman taught me the answer. More than any other American, Friedman, who won the Nobel Prize in economics in 1976, clearly warned the world about the unintended consequences of big government.

"We've become increasingly dependent on government," said Friedman. "We've surrendered power to government; nobody has taken it from us. It's our doing. The results — monumental government spending, much of it wasted, little of it going to the people whom we would like to see helped."

That's from Friedman's PBS TV series "Free to Choose," which aired 30 years ago and became the basis of his No. 1 bestseller by the same name.

The title says a lot. If we are free to make our own choices, we prosper. That was a new idea to many back then. At the time — when inflation and interest rates were in double digits and unemployment approached 10 percent — people thought a wise government could ensure economic growth, guarantee full employment and eliminate poverty. Friedman explained that the opposite was true, that bigger government had brought us "burdensome taxes, high inflation, a welfare system under which neither those who receive help nor those who pay for it are satisfied. Trying to do good with other people's money simply has not worked."

No, it hasn't. So why, 30 years later, is America doing so much more of it?

Because people still have not learned Friedman's lesson.

Because of that, I give money to a charity that offers teachers free copies of some of my TV news videos that explain the benefits of free markets. The video most popular in high schools is one in which I ask students, "When so many nations remain poor, why did America become prosperous?" Many answer, "Because we have democracy." Yet India has democracy, and India has been poor for years.

"India is overpopulated," they say. They don't know that India has the same population density as New Jersey.

Other students suggest that America prospered because of our natural resources. But Hong Kong has no natural resources. It's basically a rock. It is also more densely populated than India. Yet, in just 50 years, Hong Kong went from poverty to American levels of wealth.

How? In "Free to Choose," Friedman explained that it was the free market. Overlooking the amazing Hong Kong skyline, he said: "This miracle hasn't been achieved by government action — by someone sitting in one of those tall buildings and telling people what to do. It's been achieved by allowing the market to work."

Walking down a crowded street, he added, "They are free to buy from whom they want, to sell to whom they want, to work for whom they want. Sometimes it looks like chaos, and so it is, but underneath it's highly organized by the impersonal forces of a free marketplace."

At the time of his series, India was a symbol of enlightened central planning.

"India has tremendous economic and human potential," Friedman commented. "The human tragedy is that in India that potential has been stifled by the straightjacket imposed by an all-wise and paternalistic government. Central planning has condemned India's masses to poverty and misery." What counted most for Friedman was that people should be free to try innovative ideas and succeed ... or fail.

"The free market enables people ... to trade with whomever they want; to buy in the cheapest market around the world; to sell in the dearest. ... (B)ut most important of all: If they fail, they bear the cost."

"Most important of all." It's clear what he would have thought of today's government bailouts.

John Stossel is host of "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of "Give Me a Break" and of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel, visit his site at <a href="http://www.johnstossel.com" <http://www.johnstossel.com>>johnstossel.com</a>. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

6 Comments | Post Comment
Mr. Stossel,

While I am not (as much of) a Libertarian as you... I am definately a small "c" conservative and agree with many of your views (not all tho)... but on your views of Milton Friedman, we are "one".

The divide between "left" and "right" is not an issue of big vs. small government...that is the >>EFFECT<< of the divide, not the >>CAUSE<< of the divide.

The cause of the divide is that the left operates on a very childish view that "what feels bad" is by definiton "bad". It is the way an infant views the world. When they see poverty...it feels bad...so poverty is bad and we need to fix it.....they then use the "tool" of big-government to solve the "bad thing".

The left works under the assumption that "kindness" must be used to solve our problems. You can see it everywhere...in their blanket view that "war is evil"....that poverty must be solved by stealing from the rich... pick the issue and you can see it clearly through this prism.

The conservative world uses the opposite of kindness...they use "strictness"... people should profit from success and should not profit from failure....you need to be responsible for your own actions.... if you want to immigrate, you need to do it lawfully.

The reality is that unrestricted use of "kindness" is as deadly as inappropriate use of "strictness"... there needs to be a balance...finding this balance is the difficulty in our democracy....

Clearly we are heading in the wrong direction...but in order to find our way...we need to understand the difference between cause and effect.

Keep up the good work!

- Bob Light
Comment: #1
Posted by: Robert Light
Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:39 AM
Mr. Stossel,

Thank you for your great insight and great delivery! I saw the recent episode on Fox Business Channel (Free to Choose) with the chart that listed all the countries that were rated based on how "Free" the were. Can you post that on the web so I can share it with my friends?

Best,

Chuck
Comment: #2
Posted by: Chuck Cook
Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:24 AM
Mr. Stossel,
Generally I like your shows, but your high praise for Milton Friedman showed poor judgment. Murray Rothbard,
in his devastating critique of Friedman in "Milton Friedman unraveled" on LewRockwell.com, calls Friedman "the Establishment's Court Libertarian". Rothbard writes: "...he has functioned not as an opponent of statism and advocate of the free market, but as a technician advising the state on how to be more efficient in going about it's evil work."

Friedman played an important role in foisting upon us the disastrous withholding tax. "It permitted the government to use every employer as an unpaid tax collector, extracting the tax quietly and silently from each paycheck." The people would have revolted if they continued to pay taxes in one lumpsum.

His most disastrous deed was influencing Nixon to cut the last remaining tie between dollar and gold in 1971. This unleashed an orgy of credit expansion (printing money) on the whole world, which lasted till 2007. The result
was: leviathan state, loss of liberty, economic chaos, disappearance of whole industries in western countries as a result of trade imbalance, and much more. The fiat currency system is now in the process of self-destruction, which may bring the economic armageddon, followed by totalitarian states, wars, etc.

To praise Friedman is unworthy of a real libertarian.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Jacob Nemchenok
Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:06 PM
Jacob,
I think you are wrong about Friedmen.
Here he is in his own wordes on Donahue
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWsx1X8PV_A&feature=player_embedded
Comment: #4
Posted by: Marshall Keith
Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:53 PM
Re: Robert Light
Robert,

I think you're on the right track with your analysis of the right/left issue, bu you're thinking too one dimensionally: right and left are merely two brands of tyranny. The more important issue is between personal freedoms and the collective state; the coercive power of the state is a noose tied around each one of our necks that with every swing from right to left further restricts our lifeblood of freedom.

As far as balancing the "kindness" of the left and the "strictness" of the right? That is already happening: the Republicans were founded as the party of the republic, advocating for the rule of law; while the Democrats respected the rule of the majority. The mixing of the black and white of the two parties has resulted simply in a gray tyranny.

In order to "find our way" we don't need elections or an armed revolution, but a simple declaration of independence in our own hearts: I am the ultimate authority in my life.
Comment: #5
Posted by: John J Durso
Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:18 PM
With regard to your programs concerning "Gun Control" vs "More Shooters-Less Crime", You asked the question, "Why is the average American not aware of the cases where guns have saved lives?" Your guest gave one correct answer and that was that the media doesn't find that "Spectacular" (my term) enough. If you would like to read accounts supporting armed citizens, get a copy of The NRA's magazine "The American Rifleman" (sorry, I can't underscore) and look at the section, The Armed Citizen". Read it every month, along with the rest of the magazine, and I believe you'll find the truth. As a matter of fact, are you a member? If not, JOIN! Lew Constable Medford, Oregon
Comment: #6
Posted by: Lew Constable
Sun Jun 27, 2010 7:48 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
John Stossel
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

30 Mar 2011 Students Who Get It!

16 Nov 2011 FDA Kills Smokers

8 Apr 2009 The Universal Pre-K Scam