creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
15 Feb 2012
Never Trust Government Numbers

President Obama said in his State of the Union speech, "We've already agreed to more than $2 trillion in … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Government Can't Make Us Happy

In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson called the pursuit of happiness an unalienable right. … Read More.

1 Feb 2012
Policing the World

With an election approaching and at least some Americans upset about irresponsible spending, the president … Read More.

Competition

Share Comment

"Choice, competition, reducing costs — those are the things that I want to see accomplished in this health reform bill," President Obama told talk-show host Michael Smerconish last week (http://tinyurl.com/nb7r87).

Choice and competition would be good. They would indeed reduce costs. If only the president meant it. Or understood it.

In a free market, a business that is complacent about costs learns that its prices are too high when it sees lower-cost competitors winning over its customers. The market — actually, the consumer — holds businesses accountable and keeps them honest. No "public option" is needed.

So the hope for reducing medical costs indeed lies in competition and choice. Today competition is squelched by government regulation and privilege.

But Obama's so-called reforms would not create real competition and choice. They would prohibit it.

Competition is not a bunch of companies offering the same products and services in the same way. That sterile notion of competition assumes we already know all that there is to know.

But consumers often don't know what they want until it's offered, and their preferences and requirements change. Businesses don't know exactly what consumers want or the most efficient way to produce it until they are in the thick of the competitive hustle and bustle.

Nobel laureate F.A. Hayek taught that competition is a "discovery procedure." In other words, the "data" of supply and demand emerge only through the market process. We need open-ended competition not merely to see which rival is better, but to learn things we didn't know before and aren't likely to learn any other way.

"Competition is valuable only because, and so far as, its results are unpredictable and on the whole different from those which anyone has, or could have, deliberately aimed at," Hayek wrote.

Well-meaning politicians have created untold misery by assuming they and their experts know enough already.

The health care bills are perfect examples. If competition is a discovery process, the congressional bills would impose the opposite of competition. They would forbid real choice.

In place of the variety of products that competition would generate, we would be forced "choose" among virtually identical insurance plans.

Government would define these plans down to the last detail. Every one would have at least the same "basic" coverage, including physical exams, maternity benefits, well-baby care, alcoholism treatment and mental-health services. Consumers could not buy a cheap, high-deductible catastrophic policy. Every insurance company would have to use an identical government-designed pricing structure. Prices would be the same for sick and healthy.

In this respect, it wouldn't matter whether or not Congress created a "public option," a government insurance plan. In either case, bureaucrats would dictate virtually every aspect of the health-insurance business.

What Obama says in favor of a public option — as of today, at least — tells us how little he understands competition. The public option's virtue, he told Smerconish, is that "there wouldn't be a profit motive involved." But as St. Lawrence University economist Steven Horwitz writes in The Freeman magazine, profit is not just a motive (http://tinyurl.com/m4nd2j). Profit (along with loss) is what enables competition to perform its discovery role:

"Suppose for a moment that we try to take the profit motive out of health care by going to a system in which government pays for and/or directly provides the services. ... (P)ublic-spirited politicians and bureaucrats have replaced profit-seeking firms.

"By what method exactly will the officials know how to allocate resources? By what method will they know how much of what kind of health care people want? And more important, by what method will they know how to produce that health care without wasting resources? ... In markets with good institutions, profit-seeking producers can get answers to these questions by observing prices and their own profits and losses in order to determine which uses of resources are more or less valuable to consumers. ... (P)rofits and prices signal the efficiency (or lack thereof) of resource use and allow producers to learn from those signals."

Profit is the key to competition. Anyone who claims to favor competition but looks down at profit has no idea what he is talking about.

John Stossel is co-anchor of ABC News' "20/20" and the author of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." He has a blog at http://blogs.abcnews.com/johnstossel. To find out more about John Stossel and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
John, Why are you wasting your time at ABC? You are a great investigating reporter and commentator. ABC ratings are steadily going downhill and sooner or later they will be forced to cut staff and the highest paid are the most vulnerable. Barbara is capable of going it alone until retirement. You have too much insight to stay with ABC. I hope you will eventually listen to Fox News if they approach you. Their growing audience on Radio and Television is furtile ground for you. You don't have to agree with Rush, Bech et al. You can be your own man and comment on the things you care about and avoid political oneness. You have fairly presented both sides of any agrument and document your observations very well. We the audience don't see enough of you. What prompted this note is a recent editorial
"Obamacare's inevitable logic" published today August 26 in the Green Valley News (Arizona). Your reasoning as always is sound and the style fits with "Myth, Lies....Good Luck in the future.
John M De Stefano, retired
Comment: #1
Posted by: John M De Stefano
Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:29 PM
I am torn between free market and public option. Right now Insurance companies can discriminate against me because I am 58 years old and have High Blood Pressure which by the way is under control via medications from the cheep list that Wal-Mart started for 4 dollars per month generic drugs a free market competition success story.

My wife has had a part of her colon removed and is well now but has other conditions such as Arthritis and Fibromyalgia and Diverticulosis. We are virtually uninsurable at a price we can afford on my salary.

So as long as I am employed I am covered by my employer which I pay half which comes to 9,100. dollars per year. But in this economy I can't guarantee I will have a job tomorrow.

So John what is your solution to my problem?
Comment: #2
Posted by:
Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:03 PM
I am torn between free market and public option. Right now Insurance companies can discriminate against me because I am 58 years old and have High Blood Pressure which by the way is under control via medications from the cheep list that Wal-Mart started for 4 dollars per month generic drugs a free market competition success story.
My wife has had a part of her colon removed and is well now but has other conditions such as Arthritis and Fibromyalgia and Diverticulosis. We are virtually uninsurable at a price we can afford on my salary.
So as long as I am employed I am covered by my employer which I pay half which comes to 9,100. dollars per year. But in this economy I can't guarantee I will have a job tomorrow.
So John what is your solution to my problem?
Comment: #3
Posted by:
Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:33 PM
Dear John: You are right. Competition is everything! And, there are idea people out there who have already started to lay the groundwork for healthcare marketplace competition. Take prescription drugs, for instance...there is a website that allows individuals to check on local and nationwide competitors' prices before making the decision of where to purchase their prescription. This is especially important as so many employers are converting to Health Savings Accounts and away from traditional health coverage. That simple $10 co-pay will no longer be on the table for most employees. (After all, up until now, who cared what the total prescription price was when you only had to pay the first $10 !) The consumer will be compelled to pay attention to price now! Up until recently, one would take their prescription to their local druggist and get slapped with an ungodly price and sheepishly shell out whatever cash was asked for. You wouldn't buy a car without checking a price...why would you not carry that same habit forward into healthcare? You were right again, in your article, about the consumer not knowing what options are out there yet. Once this price checking habit becomes ingrained in the consumer psyche, competition will take hold. Remember how airline tickets were purchased before Travelocity or Priceline? In my mind, this is the same type of situation.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Joan Jumpe
Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:21 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
John Stossel
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Jacob Sullum
Jacob SullumUpdated 15 Feb 2012
John Stossel
John StosselUpdated 15 Feb 2012

18 Jan 2012 Don't Trust Your Instincts

28 Sep 2011 Governments Don't Create Prosperity

31 Jan 2007 Big, Big Government