opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
10 Feb 2016
High-Tech Ted

Politicians tailor their messages to different audiences. Facing New Hampshire's primary, Ted Cruz talked … Read More.

3 Feb 2016
Political Arrogance

After the Iowa caucus results, it looks like Hillary Clinton vs. Marco Rubio in November! They lead the … Read More.

27 Jan 2016
Running on Empty

Cars run on fuel. Politicians run on votes, and they'll do almost anything to get them. That includes … Read More.

Big Business Goes Big for Health-Care Reform


"What disturbs Americans of all ideological persuasions is the fear that almost everything, not just government, is fixed or manipulated by some powerful hidden hand," Frank Rich wrote in Sunday's New York Times (

That manipulation should disturb us. But contrary to Rich, it is not the work of "corporatists" who have sprung up to attack progressive reforms proposed by Obama and the Democratic majority. Manipulation is what we got many years ago when we traded a more or less free market for the "progressive" interventionist state. When government is big, the well-connected always have an advantage over the rest of us in influencing public policy.

Observe: Although President Obama and big-government activists demonize health-insurance companies, the companies "are still mostly on board with the president's effort to overhaul the U.S. health-care system," the Wall Street Journal reports (; and ...

Although the activists criticize Big Pharma, "The drug industry has already contributed millions of dollars to advertising campaigns for the health care overhaul through the advocacy groups like Healthy Economies Now and Families USA. It has spent about $1 million on similar advertisements under its own name," the Times reports (

Big Pharma and Big Insurance want Obama-style health-care reform?

It's not so hard to understand. "The drug makers stand to gain millions of new customers," the Times said.

And from the Journal: "If health legislation succeeds, the [insurance] industry would likely get a fresh batch of new customers. In particular, many young and healthy people who currently forgo coverage would be forced to sign up." No wonder insurers are willing to stop "discriminating" against sick people. (Forget that the essence of insurance is discrimination according to risk.)

Not that Big Pharma and Big Insurance like every detail of the Democratic plan. Drug companies don't want Medicare negotiating drug prices — for good reason. If it forces drug prices down, research and development will be discouraged. (Depending whom you believe, Obama may or may not have agreed with the drug companies on this point (

As for the insurance companies, they worry — legitimately — that a government insurance company — the so-called public option" — would drive them out of business.

This isn't alarmism. It's economics. The public option would have no bottom line to worry about and therefore could engage in "predatory pricing" against the private insurers.

But despite these differences, the biggest companies in these two industries are on board with "reform."

It illustrates economist Steven Horwitz's First Law of Political Economy: "No one hates capitalism more than capitalists" ( In this case, big business wants to shape — and profit from — what inevitably will be an interventionist health-care reform. Can you think of the last time a major business supported a truly free market in anything?

In light of all this, it's funny to watch Democrats and their activist allies panic over the protests at congressional town meetings around the country. Tools of the corporate interests! they cry. But anyone opposing "socialized medicine" at the meeting can't be a mouthpiece for big business because, as we've seen, big business supports government control. Conservative groups may be encouraging people to vent their anger at congressmen who pass burdensome legislation without even bothering to read it, but that's no reason to insult the protestors as pawns. What's wrong with organizations helping like-minded people to voice their opinions? Why do Democrats, such as Speaker Nancy Pelosi, dismiss citizen participation as "AstroTurf" — not real grassroots — only when citizens oppose the kind of big government they favor (

They weren't so dismissive when George W. Bush was president and people protested — appropriately — his accumulation of executive powers.

"When handfuls of Code Pink ladies disrupted congressional hearings or speeches by Bush administration officials," Glenn Reynolds writes (, "it was taken as evidence that the administration's policies were unpopular, and that the thinking parts of the populace were rising up in true democratic fashion. ... But when it happens to Democrats, it's something different: A threat to democracy, a sign of incipient fascism ... House Speaker Nancy Pelosi calls the 'Tea Party' protesters Nazis. ... "

So when lefties do it, it's called "community organizing."

When conservatives and libertarians do it, it's "AstroTurf."

Give me a break.

John Stossel is co-anchor of ABC News' "20/20" and the author of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." He has a new blog at To find out more about John Stossel and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at




2 Comments | Post Comment
Dear John Stossel, Hard-working Taxpayers know 'PAY AS YOU GO' for Healthcare is the only way to survive; THUS SAVING TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS! Taxpayers, that have a job at present, now know that this new administration will stop at nothing to get any kind of reform passed, good, bad, or indifferent, thus bankrupting America! This Healthcare garbage is for the illegitimates that Taxpayers have supported for years, due to control and greed of politicians, and he's now finding out that real Taxpaying Americans have begun to know that all his lies, deceit, and 'scare tactics' were just that 'LIES, DECEIT AND SCARE TACTICS'' to gain all power over the American People. Politicians stated that America would become a 'service country!' America is servicing, alright, the Employment Security Office, Social and Welfare programs, and with no manufacturing jobs in site, where's the money?
Bob Blakeneys' article, in HPE, called 'Bush Deficits' makes Taxpayers wonder why he didn't go back to the Kennedy/Carter Administration to get the true figures (instead of his untruths posted in article, but then I supposed he didn't think, as usual, that some people would check on him), when politicians started give-a-ways, handouts, giving illegitimates Taxpayers' checks they weren't entitled to, social and welfare programs creating the bankrupting of America! Sad that Blakeney doesn't want to acknowledge that people, of all races and party affiliations, created these social ills which date way past 2002 and Taxpayers should have never been responsible for this, then let alone now in these desperate times!

There are many 'long arms' of government, created by politicians deciding they could deceive Taxpayers into thinking they were actually creating jobs. Didn't it occur to anyone this way politicians could get bigger salaries,
bonuses, and retirements? Looks like it worked, because the politicians convinced the furniture businesses they could make more money with cheaper overseas labor. Nafta and Cafta got put into action in a hurry, just like
everything else politicians have their fingers in! Didn't it occur to businesses it would cost more to 'ship back and forth' thus costing millions for products?
Taxpayers want no part in Healthcare or anything else the politicians have their greedy fingers in. Read the 1018 pages! Taxpayers will pay dearly for this radical and socialist mess.

If you want to see what the 'blood-sucking tics' really are and really have done to bankrupt America and take your last penny, look at Freddie, Fannie, AIG, Citi, Automakers, now GM, and anyone taking Taxpayers money, and their lies,deceit and the 'power grab they're all after!
In the business world, politicians would be 'fired' with no compensation, no retirements, nor freebies! Has America become so used to thinking politicians should be given a second chance, so they can further control America and American's businesses, and not be fired after what they've done to America? WAKE UP, AMERICA!

WHAT WILL BE IN TAXPAYERS' WALLETS BY 2010?' Absolutely nothing as all the politicians are 'borrowing from Peter to pay Paul' and this, folks, is going to leave America more than trillions in debt to foreigners, ordinary
Taxpayers will be in the 'Poor House', with no money to buy seeds to plant a garden to feed themselves.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Sun Aug 16, 2009 9:36 AM
John, keep the audience. The goal here is to spread reason, and the unreasonable left and right will not tune into a show that is a one-sided debate. I strongly encourage you to keep doing your documentary-style journalism (perhaps monthly or quarterly documentaries), but the debate encouraged by having a dissenting audience will sway more opinions than a show like O'Reilly's. Keep up the great work, John. I applaud you.
Comment: #2
Posted by: J.P. Arendt
Thu Dec 24, 2009 12:37 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
John Stossel
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 13 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 13 Feb 2016
diane dimond
Diane DimondUpdated 13 Feb 2016

8 Aug 2007 Let Wisconsin Experiment with Socialized Medicine

29 Mar 2011 Students Who Get It!

12 Apr 2011 Welcome Budget-Cut Talk