creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
23 May 2012
Keeping Business Honest

Instinctively, we look for people's motives. We need to know whom we can trust and whom we can't. We're … Read More.

16 May 2012
Making Life Fair

When my wife was a liberal, she complained that libertarian reasoning is coldhearted. Since markets produce … Read More.

9 May 2012
Creating a Risk-Free World

A child leaving home alone for the first time takes a risk. So does the entrepreneur who opens a new business.… Read More.

Balancing the Budget

Share Comment

The political class predicted "disaster" if Congress didn't raise its debt limit.

I think that was a scam to get more money. See, the poor politicians don't have enough, and they need to borrow more. We taxpayers are cheap. This year we'll give them only $2.2 trillion. They want to spend $3.8 trillion.

The president said if he didn't get more money, Social Security checks wouldn't go out. Why not?

With $2 trillion, they can pay Social Security, Medicare, the interest on the debt and still have billions left. It's billions more than the government spent when President George W. Bush took office. What's the problem?

The problem is that Republicans and Democrats under Bush and President Obama doubled spending. Now, Obama wants more taxes.

Taxes shouldn't be the answer when spending is the problem.

Grover Norquist, who heads Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), leads the charge to keep the focus on spending. Norquist and ATR are famous for asking officeholders and candidates to sign a pledge not to raise taxes. Some say he is the reason the debt-ceiling debate was so drawn out.

"I think the reason there isn't a tax increase on the table," he told me, "is that 235 members of the House of Representatives signed a pledge never to raise taxes, a pledge to their voters, and 41 senators did. ...

"Only if you take tax increases off the table do you even begin to ... focus on spending, and that's what Obama wants to keep our focus off of. He wants us to talk about the deficit, not spending."

I pointed out that Obama might have scored points with the public because new revenues he sought — even though they wouldn't do much to shrink the deficit — would come from closing unpopular tax "loopholes."

Norquist said he favors that — if tax rates are lowered at the same time.

"(We) want to simplify the code," he said. "(We) want to take a lot of the goodies that politicians have laced into that code ... as long as you reduce tax rates and it's not a hidden tax increase."

Milton Friedman always said taxes don't tell the whole story.

What counts is how much of our resources government spends, however it acquires them. The doubling of spending under Bush and Obama hasn't gotten enough attention.

"We need to ask what it is government should do," Norquist said. "But it's going to be knockdown, drag-out. All government overspending creates the constituency for its own perpetuation. ... Weaning people off, that is very difficult."

He's right. When politicians make little cuts in the rate of spending growth, every interest group mobilizes to protect its little piece of the pie. That's why you must cut government like you take off a Band-Aid: quickly and all at once.

It's not hard to balance the budget. On my show, we made enough cuts to create a $237 billion surplus. I cut whole departments, like Education and Commerce. I cut two-thirds of the Defense Department (which still leaves it much bigger than China's). I indexed Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security to inflation, raised the retirement age, and took away benefits for rich people. But I don't have to run for office. Congressmen do, and they can't even manage to cut ridiculous tax breaks like those for ethanol.

Obama predicted disaster if the debt ceiling wasn't raised. Some predict disaster if the ratings agencies downgrade Treasury bonds. I'm dubious. In 1995, President Clinton and Republican Congress couldn't agree on a budget, so the government shut down twice, the second time for three weeks.

Did the economy grind to a halt? No. During the first shutdown, the stock market went up. During the second, it dropped then recovered.

The alarmists screamed that the fight over the debt ceiling would discourage lenders. Wrong. Ten-year Treasury bonds sold for a measly 3 percent interest (versus 15 percent in 1981).

I wasn't worried that Congress would fail to raise the debt ceiling. But I am worried that Congress will keep spending.

John Stossel is host of "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of "Give Me a Break" and of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel, visit his site at <a href="http://www.johnstossel.com" <http://www.johnstossel.com>>johnstossel.com</a>. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
It is really not hard to balance the budget if you just reform our tax system. Cutting programs like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security will create 3rd world living conditions in the richest nation in the world. That's totally unacceptable. Grover Norquist is an idiot and he seems to be running our country along with Rush Limbaugh. What is the difference between increasing taxes and cutting entitlement programs. They both achieve the same goal by taking money out of somebody's pocket.
Back to tax reform :
Eliminate corporate taxes and replace it with a business license that is rate based on gross revenue. Require importers to to pay the same license fee and any company like Wal Mart that does their own importing would require a separate business license which would make them pay for the gross import cost then again at gross sales.
Eliminate the Earned Income Credit, nobody should get more taxes back than they pay in. In fact we should go to a flat tax that would only allow for the deductions of two dependents. We shouldn't be subsidizing people to have kids. If they want them they should pay for them. Charge a property tax just like the states do with agriculture being taxed at a much lower rate. We do need to make it easier to do business in this country and cut all the red tape. We also need to eliminate unneeded government agencies that are redundant or unnecessary. A balanced budget amendment needs to have a provision that requires not only revenue to run the country but to also pay down our debt. If they exceed the budget the tax rates should automatically go up across the board to pay for the excess spending but this should only be done in times of disaster or war.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Donald Womble
Mon Aug 8, 2011 11:44 AM
With over 18% unemployment and the wars costs millions of dollars per HOUR it's no wonder the country is in trouble...Bankers unethical manuvers in the housing market was the straw that broke the camels back...To turn things around quickly we need to cut spending AND increase employment ....Cutting entitlement programs will create chaos and more unemployment....Jobs , good paying jobs is what we need....Big business has tons of money squirrelled away in overseas accounts and they dare not try bringing it back into the U.S. or face paying 35% taxes....Patriotism and a moral bussiness ethic helped to make this a great Nation ....How can one regulate honesty and pride in ones country ? Those CEO's that reaped BILLIONS of American dollars at the expense of our national economy should have been held accountable along with the politicians that they outright own...
As a nation we could create more than enough jobs by producing our own renewable energy sources...China & Germany currenty are in the lead in this area.....Brazil all but eliminated Oil based fuel by making ethanol fuel by mandate.....Here in the U.S. big oil now controls just about all green energy , they are not about to let their most profitable business " Big OIL " be replaced by renewable energy any time soon....If we were to MANDATE that alternative fuels be made here in the U.S. we could reduce unemployment to 4 or 5 % in a short time..
Comment: #2
Posted by: alanm241
Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:50 PM
Cutting the entire department of Commerce! Meaning the PTO, NIST, Census Bureau, etc...?!?!
Please John, I thought you were being serious. I never knew you were a comedian!
Comment: #3
Posted by: References
Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:40 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
John Stossel
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

11 Apr 2012 Can Government Do Anything Well?

18 Jun 2008 Legalize All Drugs

23 May 2012 Keeping Business Honest