creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
23 May 2012
Keeping Business Honest

Instinctively, we look for people's motives. We need to know whom we can trust and whom we can't. We're … Read More.

16 May 2012
Making Life Fair

When my wife was a liberal, she complained that libertarian reasoning is coldhearted. Since markets produce … Read More.

9 May 2012
Creating a Risk-Free World

A child leaving home alone for the first time takes a risk. So does the entrepreneur who opens a new business.… Read More.

Almost Everything We're Taught Is Wrong

Share Comment

We grow up learning that some things are just bad: child labor, ticket scalping, price gouging, kidney selling, blackmail, etc. But maybe they're not.

What I love about economics is that it can show that what seems harmful is actually good for society. It illuminates what common sense overlooks.

This is all covered in the eye-opening book "Defending the Undefendable" by economist Walter Block.

Most people call child labor an unmitigated evil. David Boaz of the Cato Institute and Nick Gillespie of Reason.tv say that's wrong.

"If we say that the United States should abolish child labor in very poor countries," Boaz said, "then what will happen to these children? ... They're not suddenly going to go to the country day school. ... They may be out selling their bodies on the street. That is not an improvement over working in a t-shirt factory."

In fact, studies show that in at least one country where child labor was suddenly banned, prostitution increased. Good economics teaches that as poor countries get richer and freer, capital investment raises the productivity of labor and child labor diminishes. There's no shortcut through government prohibition — unless you like starvation and child prostitution.

What about price-gouging? State laws attempt to prevent people from charging "unconscionable" prices during emergencies.

"If I'm in the neighborhood of Hurricane Katrina," Boaz said, "what I want is water and ice and generators. ... If you are in Kentucky (and) you've got 10 generators in your store, are you getting up at 4 a.m. to drive all day to get to Louisiana to sell these generators if you can only sell them for the same price you can sell them for in Kentucky? No, you're going to go down because ... you can sell them for more."

Also, if prices rise during an emergency, that's a signal for people to buy only what they most need. That leaves more for everyone else. If the price remains low, an incentive to conserve is lost.

Ticket scalpers are seen as sleazy guys who cheat you by marking up the price of tickets. Profits go to middlemen instead of the performers.

What good could they possibly do?

"I like to think of ticket scalpers as the guy who stands in line so that I don't have to," Gillespie said.

Time spent in line is part of the ticket cost. Scalpers let you pay entirely in money, rather than partly in valuable time.

Most people say that selling body parts is wrong.

"It also seems wrong to have people dying because they can't get a kidney," Boaz said.

Some 400,000 Americans are on a waiting list now for a new kidney, and they are not allowed to pay for one.

"We sell hair. We sell sperm. We sell eggs these days." Boaz added.

Gillespie added, "The best way to grow the supply and allow more people to live is to allow the market to price those organs."

Maybe the most counterintuitive position argued on my show was that blackmail should not be a crime. Blackmail (unlike extortion) is the demand for money in return for withholding information. Robin Hanson, a George Mason University economist, defends blackmail.

"The thing you're threatening when you're threatening blackmail (is) gossip," Hanson said. "If it should be all right to tell people, it should be all right to threaten to tell people."

What we don't like, however, is the blackmailer saying, "Pay me to keep quiet."

"But the effect of that is to make people behave," Hanson said. "If we (allow) blackmail, people behave even more because they are even more afraid of what might happen if they don't."

Maybe Ponzi-schemer Bernie Madoff would have been caught earlier?

"That's right. ... Blackmail is actually a form of private law enforcement."

Also, since gossip is free speech, blackmail is simply selling the service of not engaging in free speech. Why should that be outlawed?

I subtitled my last book, "Everything You Know Is Wrong." I was exaggerating, of course, but many things we're taught are fallacies. That's why I like economics. It explodes fallacies.

John Stossel is host of "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of "Give Me a Break" and of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel, visit his site at <a href="http://www.johnstossel.com" <http://www.johnstossel.com>>johnstossel.com</a>. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

6 Comments | Post Comment
IMO, the morality--and possibly even legality--of "blackmail" is nowhere nearly as clear-cut as asserted here.

At some point, when potential "blackmailer" is in possession of definite knowledge of criminal conduct, a legal duty to inforrm law-enforcement authorities must arise.

I have to--somewhat reluctantly--agree that, absent such definite knowledge, seeking payment in exchange for silence would appear to be legally excusable.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Steven Haver
Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:00 PM
There is no way anybody should be legally obliged to report criminal activity. With the ever-expanding list of laws in our "free" society, we can't be held accountable for being "snitches" for the government. Do we report everyone of our friends we know that drive in excess of the speed limit or park illegally? How do we as citizens draw the line of what we're legally required to report and what we can let slide. It's a very slippery slope. After all, being a government informant is what Saddam Hussein required of his citizens.

Free speech isn't just saying what you choose but it is also choosing what not to say.
Comment: #2
Posted by: SpellCzech
Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:31 PM
Dear Author,
I can hardly accept the views mentioned above, it seems to be logical in some aspect, though. Economics itself basing on hypothesis is not a Panacea. The most basic Ethics and Human Principles should also be applied, if not, the drug trade, munitions and smuggling etc could be the biggest businesses in the world basing on the hypothesis of economics. As the Greek Philosopher Euripides said, Those whom God wishes to destroy, he first make mad. So it is important to keep a balance between life and theory. FYI.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Justin
Thu Aug 25, 2011 6:33 PM
Re: Justin
The drug and arms trades, along with human trafficking, ARE three of the biggest industries in the world, largely because they operate on the black market.
Every law has two types of consequences: intended (what they said it was going to do when they passed it) and unintended (which were either unforeseen or played down by the lawmakers).
Prohibition, for example, led to the rise of organized crime in the US, massive violence, a rise in Federal power, an expansion of police intervention, the BATF, and eventually, the drug war.
Banning child labor in underdeveloped countries has been shown to have the unintended consequence of increasing hunger and child prostitution.
Look, I agree that Machiavelli was wrong: the ends do not justify the means. But can we also agree that Kant was wrong: the means, no matter how noble, do not justify bad ends. We have to consider not just the motives but the actual consequences of our actions.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Tim
Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:48 AM
Banning child labor never helped children. Just made them second class citizens by law. Since I grew up on a farm I was not persecuted by these laws.I was able to make enough during my childhood and teens to pay for my college education plus receive the education that only working can achieve.Poor working conditions for all workers was always the problem not child labor. If handicapped people can safely perform in the workplace so can children as long as another law is not passed to force companies to give children equal pay and equal access to all jobs.
Comment: #5
Posted by: CLAY
Sat Aug 27, 2011 1:31 PM
Re: Steven Haver

If it it was knowledge of a criminal activity blackmail would simply make you an accessory. I am sure you see people driving with cell phones or speeding...do you turn them in?
Comment: #6
Posted by: Eric
Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:13 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
John Stossel
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

16 May 2007 The Tax-Cut Myth

11 Mar 2009 The Fatal Conceit

14 Mar 2007 Hazardous Safety Regulation