opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
10 Feb 2016
High-Tech Ted

Politicians tailor their messages to different audiences. Facing New Hampshire's primary, Ted Cruz talked … Read More.

3 Feb 2016
Political Arrogance

After the Iowa caucus results, it looks like Hillary Clinton vs. Marco Rubio in November! They lead the … Read More.

27 Jan 2016
Running on Empty

Cars run on fuel. Politicians run on votes, and they'll do almost anything to get them. That includes … Read More.

A Minimum Wage Equals Minimum Jobs


The media are never better at displaying their economic illiteracy than when they report on the minimum wage.

"Workers got a raise on Friday when the federal minimum wage was hiked 70 cents to $7.25 an hour," the Christian Science Monitor reported last week. "They'll be shouting, "Olé!" (

They assume that if politicians declare that workers should get a raise, they will actually get it. But the idea that government can increase wages by decree with only good consequences rests on a serious economic fallacy: that employers set wages arbitrarily. If wages are very low, it must be that employers are stingy.

Actually, employers are stingy; they want to pay workers as little as possible, just as workers want to be paid as much as possible. But in a market — even a government-hampered market like ours — employers' wishes are tempered by the reality of competition. So even if an employer wants to pay workers who produce, say, $4 worth of value an hour only $2 an hour, he won't be able to. Someone else will hire them away for $3 or more.

Some clueless politicians want to "help" workers further by requiring a "living" wage, a minimum well above the national minimum. After all, it's hard to live on $7.50 an hour.

Several years ago, the city council of Santa Monica, Calif., decided to make the town a workers' paradise by passing a union-backed law requiring everyone to be paid at least $12.25 an hour.

At the time, restaurant owner Jeff King complained to me that that law would "dry up the entry-level jobs for just the people they're trying to help."

He was right. It's why gas stations no longer hire teenagers to wash your windshield. Wage minimums tell employers: "Don't give a beginner a chance."

Such losses are hard to see, but they are widespread. One company closes because it can't afford to pay higher wages. Another decides to produce its product with fewer workers, and another never expands. Perhaps most importantly, there's the business that never opens. The people who were never hired don't complain — they wouldn't know whom to blame — they don't even know that they were harmed.

They are the unseen victims.

The good news is that the people of Santa Monica woke up and overturned the "living wage."

The bad news is that more than a hundred other living-wage ordinances have passed (

In Washington, D.C., companies that get $100,000 or more in government contracts are required to pay employees at least $11.75 per hour. In Manchester, Conn., they must pay at least $14.

If minimum-wage advocates really believe wages are set arbitrarily, why do they favor only a $7.50 or $14 minimum? Why not $100?

At those levels, even a diehard interventionist knows that workers would be hurt. But the principle is the same at lower levels. If wages are a function of productivity, not whim, then it follows that if the minimum wage is set above workers' productivity, those workers — the intended beneficiaries of the legislation — will be harmed.

The Law of Unintended Consequences strikes again. Well, let me correct that. For some minimum-wage advocates, the bad consequences are not quite unintended. Consider the support for the minimum wage from large companies like Wal-Mart and organized labor. Why do they want the minimum raised? Economist Alex Tabarrok of George Mason University answers, "[T]hese employers will benefit from an increase in the minimum wage because it will raise the costs of their rivals. This is why unions have typically been in favor of the minimum wage even when their own workers make much more than the minimum" (

Where there's "humanitarian" government intervention, there are politically connected special interests reaping the benefits.

Politicians have tried to defy the market process with minimum-wage and living-wage laws for years. The consequences are never good for the people they claim to want to help. When will we learn what workers need is not meddling politicians but free and competitive markets?

Anyone who truly wants to help workers achieve higher living standards will work to remove all government barriers to peaceful, consensual economic activity.

John Stossel is co-anchor of ABC News' "20/20" and the author of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." He has a new blog at To find out more about John Stossel and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at




2 Comments | Post Comment
Dear John Stossell, The politicians couldn't care less about companies closing as they want to 'TAKE CONTROL OF ALL AMERICANS' and this is why they won't change voting laws! Taxpayers have been Discriminated against for years with the non-working people being allowed to vote so they can continue receiving social and welfare programs and money they're not entitled to! Companies have repeatedly stated "we'll have to cut work staff if any more increased happen!" Guess what happens then? This is exactly what the politicians want - more control, bigger government! Isn't this like the Healthcare, Freddie, Fannie, AIG, Automakers, Insurance, bailouts, handouts, social and welfare programs costing trillions America doesn't have?
After the politicians did the Nafta and Cafta - the selling of America - they should have been shipped to all these foreign countries, at that time, with no return to America!

America is now an enslaved nation with trillions of dollars in debt and all because of deceit and greed. I'm quoting John Adams - "There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword, the other is by debt."
Surely, you remember history and the Dictator that said "We'll destroy America and never lift a finger!" If this doesn't wake you up, nothing will!

Comment: #1
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Mon Aug 3, 2009 3:03 PM
I love the Capital system that Both parties have destoryed from Johnson,Nixon, Reagan{who was the biggest spenders and accumulator of Massive debt and federal deficits of all times until Bush2} and final the KING of Debt building Bush2.One must remember, that not only have we been charging up our debt on our Credit cards we also been shipping our working classes jobs over seas and signing massive free trade agreements that have been approved{especially by Repub's}by most of our presidents/Congresses since Johnson and continue today!
I always get a kick out of the forgetfulness or IS it called "Temporary Anmenia" that especially Repub's get into, in justfy their New awaking of Budget concerns as their past hero's i.e. REAGAN/Bush2 broke World records in deficits spending,robbing the intergovernment trust funds and in general destorying our working classes and their jobs.
Comment: #2
Posted by: William Oneill
Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:35 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
John Stossel
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 14 Feb 2016
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 14 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 13 Feb 2016

10 Feb 2016 High-Tech Ted

9 Sep 2015 Cutting Red Tape

11 Jun 2014 Libertarians Versus Conservatives