creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
23 Jul 2014
Policing America

I want the police to be better armed than the bad guys, but what exactly does that mean today? Apparently it … Read More.

16 Jul 2014
Who'll Build the Roads?

"Tea party members don't think there's a federal role in transportation!" complained Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio,… Read More.

9 Jul 2014
Important Slow News

Wars, plane crashes, mass murder — it's easy to report news that happens suddenly. Reporters do a good … Read More.

A Libertarian Year Ahead?

Comment

As 2011 draws to a close, I wonder: Is freedom winning? Did America become freer this year? Less free? How about the rest of the world?

I'm a pessimist. I fear Thomas Jefferson was right when he said, "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." That's what's happened. Bush and Obama doubled spending and increased regulation. Government's intrusiveness is always more, never less. The state grows, and freedom declines.

But there were bright spots. We don't yet know what will become of what people call the Arab Spring. But this year, for the first time in my life, there was hope that masses of people in the Middle East will embrace liberalism — in the original sense of people being left alone to pursue their own lives.

Another possible bright spot: President Obama declared the war in Iraq over. I don't believe it because 17,000 embassy personnel remain, but at least he's saying it, and troops have left. Some will also leave Afghanistan. But I'm confused. Obama was elected partly because he promised to end the wars. But then he almost tripled the number of American soldiers in Afghanistan, from 35,000 to 100,000.

I'm pessimistic about America going bankrupt, like Greece, thanks to ballooning spending on entitlements like Medicare. But terms of debate can change quickly. This spring, Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan presented a timid plan that would have slowed the growth of government slightly. Even Republicans went bonkers. Newt Gingrich called it "right-wing social engineering."

But now, just seven months later, the country's in a different place. Newt's apologized. Speaker John Boehner and other Republicans praise Ryan's plan. The Republican Study Committee wants to go further. Now Ryan agrees that his plan was "mild." Today he says he'd go farther.

Maybe attitudes changed because Americans watched the video of riots in Greece and realized what can happen when the money runs out. Maybe Standard and Poor's downgrading of the government's credit rating mattered. Maybe attitudes changed simply because the deficit numbers are so ugly that even the establishment has to acknowledge it.

But also, attitudes changed because we libertarians won the battle of ideas.

Now every Republican presidential candidate — not just Ron Paul — talks about free enterprise.

Alec Baldwin told Occupy Wall Street demonstrators, "You can't not have strong capital markets in this country or the country's going to go down the tubes."

Wow. Even left-wing celebrities defend "strong capital markets"? The world is moving toward limited government and free enterprise. We libertarians have won!

What am I talking about? We haven't won. Even Republicans want to grow government. When the Super Committee failed to reach its super conclusion and thereby put us on automatic pilot to a trillion dollars in spending cuts, Republicans screamed about draconian damage to the military. But the automatic cuts are really just cuts in the rate of increase. Spending will still go up, just at a slightly slower rate. Why is this even controversial?

I fear that much of the country is in agreement with the Wall Street protestors who love free stuff from government — free health care, free college education, free lunch. Elderly Americans want no cuts to Medicare. Even after the Solyndra scandal, 62 percent of Americans say America should continue to invest in clean-energy jobs. Don't they think about what that money would be producing if left in the hands of free, entrepreneurial individuals? No.

Lots of Americans oppose free trade and free markets. It takes some knowledge to realize that the seeming chaos masks underlying order. The benefits of freedom are not intuitive, and when you go against people's intuition, they get upset.

The benefits of freedom are largely "unseen," as the 19th century French liberal Frederic Bastiat put it. He meant that rising living standards and labor-saving inventions don't appear to flow from freedom. But they do.

It's one of the ironies of life that people need not understand freedom for it to work, and because of this, there is the perennial danger that they will give it up without realizing the disastrous consequences that follow.

We freedom-lovers have a lot more work to do.

John Stossel is host of "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of "Give Me a Break" and of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel, visit his website at JohnStossel.com. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM



Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Borrowing a format of Thomas Sowell, a few random thoughts:
Attitudes as a whole did not change due to Americans watching the riots in Greece. Many watching them have no problem with rioting as a valid political statement. Many others already knew what the ultimate result of the profligate spending would be, and know how to properly prevent any bankruptcies. A handful might have changed their minds, shifting the average. But the reality that remains is that close to 50% (either side thereof) want to have their cake and eat it too.
In re Alec Baldwin - that should be "Capital markets" (note capitalization), since in his context, that is most likely used as a proper name (as in "Capital One Bank). But once we get done with all the gov't controls that Mr Baldwin would want, "capital markets" would be in name only - the reality would be "government markets.
Not only do people not have to understand freedom for it to work, but neither do they have to misunderstand statism for it to not work.
Freedom lovers always had a lot of work to do. It's a full-time job, that transcends any one person's lifetime.
Comment: #1
Posted by: andre
Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:41 AM
I, for one, would be willing to vote for any new member of government who pledges to resist any activity on the part of government that violates the liberty of any honorable citizen.

As Bastiat taught: the purpose of just law is a collective extension of our individual rights to self defense. No more. No less. He warned that dangerous and sweeping attacks upon liberty can be made 'legal' by a majority vote of the legislature . . . but not constitutional.

The oath of office for any public official should be amended to read: "At any time, if I am found to have promoted or knowingly allowed any action of government to violate the liberty of any honorable citizen, I will tender my resignation and forfeit all present and future benefits."

We have increasingly valid reasons to fear our own government. It is the government who should fear the honorable citizen. Until we get a grip on that condition, all other issues are moot. A return to the Founding Fathers intent in writing Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution is the salvation of all that the honorable citizens of this nation have achieved.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Bob Nuckolls
Wed Dec 28, 2011 8:59 AM
Who among us is truly free?
Free from government - no one tiz
In "civilized" society.
We won't stay out of others' biz
Freedom lovers quote words of old
To try to make some point of now
Of freedom being bought and sold
By governments that don't know how.
Free entrepreneurism might
Be hyped as something all should choose
As a freedom that is just right,
The measure of who win, who lose.

In the 21st century,
Freedom - to be or not to be.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Ima Ryma
Wed Dec 28, 2011 11:01 PM
We're doomed!

Cigarettes and bullets will be the currency of the coming revolution.

Start stockpiling.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Basil Beighey
Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:04 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
John Stossel
Jul. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roger Simon
Roger SimonUpdated 30 Jul 2014
Ben Shapiro
Ben ShapiroUpdated 30 Jul 2014
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 30 Jul 2014

6 Jun 2007 Why Is Profit a Dirty Word?

29 Mar 2013 Imperial Washington

9 Jun 2010 Free to Choose