"There was once a need for unions, but they've outlived their purpose," said a nice lady interviewed on the radio in Tennessee just the other day. Annoyed by the spectacle of tens of thousands of teachers, firefighters, cops and other public employees rallying to protect their rights in Wisconsin, she was saying what more than a few Americans think about the labor movement.
They ought to think again — unless they want their children and grandchildren to become the peons of a corporate oligarchy.
Behind the vague notion that unions are somehow obsolete is the suggestion that workers — and their families — are amply protected by the law's provisions prohibiting child labor and mandating minimum wages, safe working conditions, overtime pay and all the other standards that we now take for granted.
But if you listen carefully to "conservatives" of the ilk of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and billionaire financier David Koch, you'll learn that they want to do away with most if not all of those advances, hard won by the labor movement and its allies over the past century. Their core belief is that the state should never interfere with capital — and therefore every law defending workers or consumers is a constitutional abomination. Their ultimate project is to return this country to the absolute dominion of the wealthy that existed before the rise of the Progressive Movement and the New Deal.
Politicians like Walker know better than to articulate their goals so unappealingly. Invariably, they prefer to talk about fiscal responsibility and balanced budgets, hoping that nobody will notice (in Wisconsin or Washington) how they squander vast sums on tax breaks for the wealthy while demanding "sacrifice" from the middle class and the poor. Breaking unions is the only way, they tell us, to restore jobs and ensure prosperity.
But if you thumb back through the pages of our economic history over the past hundred years or so, a number of obvious facts stand out. First, the United States enjoyed a far better distribution of income and a steady improvement of our productivity and power when the labor movement was strong. Second, labor always struggled to expand human and civil rights for everyone, whether or not they happened to belong to unions. And third, the success of labor's effort toward a more equitable society ensured broad prosperity for decades. As labor's power diminished, income and wealth skewed upward — and helped drive the economy into stagnation and recession.
So Americans not only display ingratitude when they denigrate unions, which have done so much to improve the lives of ordinary people, but ignorance as well. Even in its terribly weakened condition, the labor movement remains a bulwark against the kind of corporate tyranny that would swiftly make serfs of the rest of us.
This week, a prankster pretending to be David Koch phoned Gov. Walker and recorded their chummy, obnoxious, highly revealing conversation. Hearing the governor eagerly agree as his top contributor rambled on about union "bastards" was like listening to a conversation between a robber baron and a servile politician of the Gilded Age. Here was the new version of the unvarnished "conservatism" that ruled us before our forebears learned to stand upright, join together and fight for democracy.
It is more than a funny coincidence that the Wisconsin uprising echoes the revolutionary democratic fervor currently sweeping across North Africa and the Mideast.
Common to every dictatorship, from the fascist and communist despots of the 20th century to their counterparts in today's authoritarian societies, is the impulse to forbid workers from organizing. The legacy of those who established those rights with their blood and toil, both here and abroad, is not ours to surrender to bullies such as Walker and Koch. Like all of our liberties, it is a trust to be guarded — by every means available.
To find out more about Joe Conason, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM

|
 |
Comments
|
6 Comments | Post Comment
|
|
"... a steady improvement of our productivity..."
What does this particular union produce besides funding for the democratic party? At a (coerced) teacher's meeting in the early 1990's we were chastised by a union bigwig, "I know some of you voted for John Engler" Yeah, I did, and I stood up and went to play golf instead. They took my money, my money, and instead of protecting me in either event, played the liberal/union card to the hilt. Did I get a choice as to where that money was spent? If not, who is this union representing, certainly not me. If you want to say that unions are good, I'll agree, but unions as political fronts and money launderers stink. This is not a union battling greedy corporations, a liberal bugaboo. These people are battling taxpayers who make less than unionists do, have less job security, and have already felt the effects of the great "global economy". Welcome to the new world.
At least Republicans went to work during the Obamacare debate. They took their beating and waited until the voters spoke. Democrats from Wisconsin are hiding in Illinois. Shameful. They are supposed to be at work. They are being paid to work. IF they are not necessary let's go to part time legilations across the board. TheY listen to constituens as well as unions listen to dues paying members. Not at all.
The sky won't fall if concessions are made. Ubless you believe that the only good job is a government job.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Tom
Wed Feb 23, 2011 4:59 PM
|
|
|
|
Private sector unions are different from public sector unions. In the private sector, the union represents the workers and the company represents the customers, the non-union workers, the stock holders and the company. The company can determine how much to negotiate with, using tangible assets, determine how much to settle for, without bankrupting the company. In the private sector, no ones represents the taxpayers and the unions rapr. plunder and pillage without producing anything tangible. For all those who glorify FDR, he knew that public employee unionism was a catistrophic idea that would eventually bankrupt this country. If the SEIU continues to greedily suck away, soon there will be nothing left.
Comment: #2
Posted by: David Henricks
Wed Feb 23, 2011 11:22 PM
|
|
|
|
The American free enterprise system doesn't need unions, it doesn't need workers. Apple has ~30,000 overpaid, Nannie state protected American workers and a ~1,000,000 paid right, Chinese workers. The last quarters have been the most profitable in corporate history with10% unemployment. American workers have to get used to the fact that they are over paid, over protected and over benefited. When they accept third world wages unemployment will again shrink.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Tom Baxter
Thu Feb 24, 2011 10:48 AM
|
|
|
|
Unions negotiate ridiculously cushy packages for themselves - - and in the long term, shoot themselves in the foot. I grew up in a small Rust-belt city that used to be a booming industrial area. No more. Nearly all the manufacturing companies have left, because the unions are so terrible to deal with that they leave you unprofitable. Building after building stands empty. I remember that at my father's company, sometimes the union would refuse to work any overtime. The white-collar employees would then step in and do the extra work needed instead, so product could still get out the door. I remember my dad shaking his head when he came home one day and noted that his productivity for that day, without even trying hard, was 4x the rate at which the union workers do that same job. By union agreement the company couldn't make the workers do the work any faster than X pieces per hour ... and somebody who had never done the job before was able to do 4x that amount without breaking a sweat!! You've got to be KIDDING me. No wonder all the companies have left my hometown! I hope those workers from decades past are happy with themselves now, when they look at all the once-proud old brick buildings with broken windows and boarded-up doors.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Kim
Thu Feb 24, 2011 1:46 PM
|
|
|
|
Wrong! The unions have outlived their usefulness and currently exist for the survival of their infrastructure only. The unions in this country are just jacking up the prices of everything without adding any value at all. Given the current world-wide need for labor, the unions are totally unnecessary in that Corporations will not abuse their work forces due to the international competition. If we don't bring an end to this "added value tax" then all jobs will be lost to countries where they do not have to keep this overhead to keep the political system greased. Get out now before it is too late!
Comment: #5
Posted by: Alan Arthur
Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:32 PM
|
|
|
|
Yes, by all means lets race to the bottom. The massive growth in the Chinese economy won't even pay for the environmental devastation that has occurred as a byproduct of it.
If any of the commenters here are members of the middle class, they have achieved their level of wealth on the shoulders of union activists that died fighting for worker's rights. Sure some unions have been corrupted, given enough time what human endeavor hasn't?
If anyone believes that people like the Koch brothers are ever going to treat their employees fairly and the environment with respect without a fight, they are beyond naive.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Gene Case
Tue Mar 1, 2011 1:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|