creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Joe Conason
Joe Conason
1 Nov 2014
Plutocrat or Populist? Actually, Hillary Clinton Is Neither

As America's biggest political target — a status she is likely to enjoy for the foreseeable future &#… Read More.

24 Oct 2014
Debunking Christie's Minimum Wage Mythology

If there is any upside to the constant blabber from a politician such as Chris Christie, it is that he blurts … Read More.

17 Oct 2014
Let Obama and Frieden Do Their Jobs

If the prospect of hanging concentrates the mind, then even the possibility of infection with Ebola should do … Read More.

Obama's Cup of Tea

Comment

If conservative leaders no longer even try to offer serious solutions to national problems, nobody should underestimate their capacity or their will to mobilize angry Americans. Behind the April 15 "tea parties" rallying against President Barack Obama's economic program — promoted as a new phenomenon by Fox News Channel and right-wing bloggers — stands a phalanx of Republicans whose ideology is all too familiar.

At the apex of the tea-party movement, aside from such Fox revolutionaries as Rupert Murdoch, there is a well-funded organization known as FreedomWorks, headed by a former politician named Dick Armey. His past career should be instructive to any starry-eyed citizens who believe that they have at last found the true right-wing revolutionary path.

Back when the Republicans first gained control of Congress more than a decade ago, Armey, a former economics professor at a small Texas college, was hailed as the author of the Contract with America and led the Republicans as House Majority Leader until his retirement. Having risen to power on the strength of a "tax revolt" against President Bill Clinton's first budget, which raised rates on the wealthiest Americans to trim the enormous deficit he had inherited from the first Bush administration. That summer, Armey warned of an economic apocalypse — and his party won the midterm election before his predictions could be proved embarrassingly wrong.

As anyone with a functioning memory should know, the Republicans under the leadership of Armey and his cronies Newt Gingrich and Tom DeLay proceeded to rack up excesses in spending and boodling that made the old Democratic Congressional leaders look quite stingy. When he was asked once why he and his GOP comrades were chomping so much more federal pork than the Democrats ever did, he replied bluntly: "To the victors go the spoils."

Like so many self-styled populists of both parties in Washington, Armey packed his own golden parachute when he left Congress. At the same time that he took over the leadership of the "grassroots" group that eventually became FreedomWorks, he also joined a major corporate lobbying firm.

The website of DLA Piper, one of the capital's biggest bipartisan law and lobbying outfits, boasts of Armey's influence among his colleagues. As it happens, he specializes in homeland security, a major growth industry with billions wasted annually on corporate boondoggles. After all, his final legislative masterwork was to chair the House Select Committee on Homeland Security, and he was the prime sponsor of the legislation that created the Department of Homeland Security. Of course, he isn't listed as a lobbyist, but instead is called a "senior policy advisor."

As for FreedomWorks, which has claimed a national membership of some 700,000 conservative activists, its operations have long smelled of Astro-turf, or artificial grassroots. Most of the money that funded Armey's activism in the past was provided by tobacco, pharmaceutical and banking interests — and there is no reason to think that has changed.

Nor is the ideological bent of the tea party's host in any sense new. When last heard from in 2005, Armey was busily conjuring phony grass-roots support for Social Security privatization. That effort led to a notorious episode involving a FreedomWorks employee who showed up at the Bush White House, where she was introduced as a "single mom from Iowa" endorsing the president's private-accounts scheme.

Buzzing beneath the furious rants of the tea-party protests, it is not hard to hear the same old right-wing rhetoric about taxes and deficits and the same old schemes to cut the taxes for the wealthiest citizens, deregulate the economy and despoil the environment. The difference between the heyday of Armey and now is that we have suffered the results of those policies in practice and reject them. The appeal of the Republican Party and conservatism as a movement are lower than ever.

Months of furious propaganda on talk radio and Fox News has achieved nothing so far, according to nearly every survey. Barack Obama's approval ratings remain close to 66 percent, with most Americans trusting him and believing that the country is on the path to renewal. This president has long benefited from ineffectual and discredited adversaries — and Armey is no exception.

Joe Conason writes for the New York Observer (www.observer.com). To find out more about Joe Conason, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
The funniest thing they say is that George W. Bush inherited a recession from the Clinton administration.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Paul M. Petkovsek
Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:24 PM
Sir,
Your column today is an affront to journalism. It minimises the Teaparties and the participating American citizens, and minimizing is a form of dishonesty. Your column today is intellectually dishonest. I consider you just one more paid leftist with no intellectual independence and so not worth reading. You cannot earn respect writing such trash.
I worked for Pacific Stars and Stripes in Vietnam in 1968 and have taught journalism and have a Masters degree in Writing. I am very qualified to criticize you. WE will see you next election.
Jack Benedict
Comment: #2
Posted by: Jack Benedict
Sat Apr 18, 2009 2:19 PM
Mr. Conason, this is humor, right? I mean, you don't really believe the tripe that you have written here. I wish that instead of idiocy such as this, you would yield the floor and take a vacation to tour reality. If you really believe what you have written, then there is no sense in my going on, but if, as I suspect, you are one of those Obama accolytes who now feels that he must go down with the ship, I salute you and wish you good luck in your next position because after the mess that these boneheads in the administration make, your career as a political analyst will be over
Comment: #3
Posted by: Jobe
Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:02 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Joe Conason
Nov. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 3 Nov 2014
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 1 Nov 2014
diane dimond
Diane DimondUpdated 1 Nov 2014

1 Apr 2010 Democracy and Domestic Violence

4 Jan 2007 Saddam-Style Justice, in Our Name

21 Feb 2013 Staying Stupid: Why the 'Hip' Young Republicans Can't Change Their Party (or Themselves)