creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Joe Conason
Joe Conason
24 May 2012
Where's the ‘Beef'? Clinton's Answer to Romney Snark

For Mitt Romney, the president's greatest vulnerability seems to be that Barack Obama is no Bill Clinton … Read More.

17 May 2012
The Only True Way to Save Marriage From Obama

For honoring his conscience on the issue of marriage equality, President Obama earned angry rebukes from all … Read More.

10 May 2012
What the China Crisis (and His Gay Crisis) Revealed About Mitt

Just as aspiring judges ought to possess the quality known as "judicial temperament," a would-be … Read More.

A Bush-Style Whitewash

Share Comment

For anyone who followed the story of how and why Sarah Palin fired her state's public safety commissioner, last week's release of a legislative investigation that found she had violated state ethics statutes was anticlimactic. After all, everyone knows that she and her husband, Todd, tried to push Walt Monegan, then Alaska's public safety commissioner, to fire a state trooper named Mike Wooten, who was involved in a bitter divorce from Ms. Palin's sister — and that after Mr. Monegan refused, he lost his job.

But while the state probe's conclusions were unsurprising, there is still something to be learned from its findings and the McCain-Palin campaign's response. From beginning to end, this episode demonstrates a disregard for the rule of law and a contemptuous attitude toward truth that are all too familiar by now.

Here, too, the election of the Republican ticket will mean more of what we have already experienced for the past eight years.

It is a pattern that can be traced back through the years of the Bush administration whenever a whiff of scandal arises: Promise a thorough investigation and full cooperation with the lawful authorities. Then stonewall and withhold evidence and testimony so that the investigation can never quite be completed. Insist that the partial investigation is actually a full and complete exoneration, even if official reports and prosecutors clearly indicate otherwise. Create a "reality" that will be mirrored and echoed by friendly media and the partisan base, while denigrating any effort to discuss actual facts as a conspiracy by the "liberal" media.

Whitewash, rinse and repeat.

The same seedy pattern can be traced in the White House response to the Valerie Plame scandal and more recently in the probe of the firing of U.S. attorneys, both of which implicated the former deputy chief of staff, Karl Rove. And it can be seen just as clearly in the way that Palin and her campaign handlers have dealt with the problems of "Troopergate" — which culminated in her strange statement over the weekend claiming that the scorching report on her firing of Monegan had "cleared" her.

"I'm very, very pleased to be cleared of any legal wrongdoing, any hint of any kind of unethical activity there. Very pleased to be cleared of any of that," she told reporters.

"If you read the report, you'll see that there was nothing unlawful or unethical about replacing a cabinet member." Or as McCain campaign manager and lobbyist Rick Davis assured the credulous audience of Fox News Channel: "The reality is there was absolutely no wrongdoing found in the report … [and] no violations of any kinds of laws or ethics rules."

Reading the 263-page report, however, it is obvious that Palin was no more cleared of unethical activity than she blocked the "bridge to nowhere." In fact, precisely the reverse is true. The legislative report, filed by one of Alaska's most respected and nonpartisan prosecutors, states with absolute clarity that as governor, Palin violated the Executive Branch Ethics Act, which prohibits any official from seeking to "benefit a personal interest." She, her husband and her aides tried on nearly 20 separate occasions to induce Mr. Monegan to fire her former brother-in-law. The wording of the report's conclusion could not be plainer — namely that "impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates in order to advance a personal agenda, to wit: to get Trooper Michael Wooten fired."

But she didn't violate state law — as far as the investigation could determine — because that law permitted her to fire Mr. Monegan for any reason whatsoever. The ethics violations occurred before the firing.

The other bad habit that Palin seems to share with Rove and the Republicans currently in power is her allergy to disclosure, even when required by law. The 263-page report notes acidly that the Palin probe suffered from stonewalling by members of her administration, with at least 10 top officials refusing to testify or ignoring subpoenas, presumably on the advice of the New York lawyer hired by the McCain campaign. Some of those same individuals later "agreed" to provide responses to written questions — not the same as sworn testimony — long after their answers would have been useful to the investigators. Moreover, the Palin administration refused to provide e-mails and other documentation that the investigators required. Executive privilege, they cried, parroting the perennial Bush line.

John McCain enhanced his reputation over the past eight years by his occasional demurrals from the worst abuses of the Bush administration, including torture. Aware of the president's bottoming poll numbers, he said the other day that "we cannot spend the next four years as we have spent much of the last eight." But that is precisely what we will do if he and his unethical pit bull enter the White House.

Joe Conason writes for the New York Observer (www.observer.com). To find out more about Joe Conason, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
You said it, finally. All this mudslinging going on, all these distractions. The truth is, no one wants to hear the truth. We all want to hear what we want to hear. To change the facts to suit ourselves. I'd say we're screwed no matter who gets in. I'd like Obama to win, just for something new and different. Though if McCain wins, it would be interesting to see if eventually the voters would impeach him. If Obama wins, Biden will probably be President. You know they won't let Obama serve his full term and they'll stop at nothing. I don't see good days ahead.
Comment: #1
Posted by: liz
Wed Oct 15, 2008 10:07 PM
What is not mentioned here:

Based on the internal investigation findings, Grimes (Chief of the Alaska State Troopers) announced on March 1, 2006 that she would suspend Wooten (Sarah Palin's Former Brother-in-law) for ten days. In announcing the suspension, Grimes referred to the Taser, moose and beer incidents, and also to seven other negative actions in Wooten's personnel file, such as failing to use turn signals. She did not mention the alleged death threat (against Sarah Palin's Father) or any other allegations regarding threats (threats talking about bringing Sarah and her family down if she involved herself in Wooten and Mcann's divorce). She concluded that "The record clearly indicates a serious and concentrated pattern of unacceptable and at times, illegal activity occurring over a lengthy period, which establishes a course of conduct totally at odds with the ethics of our profession". After a union protest, the suspension was reduced to five days, and Wooten was warned by Grimes that he would be fired if he committed any further misconduct.

So when she achieved office she took all the circumstances that had happened in her past. She had an insiders look at who Wooten was and what he was capable of and she formally requested he be removed by someone who had the authority to take that action. When said cabinet member refused she removed him and placed someone else in his place.

On August 13, Palin said specifically that her action (firing Monegan) was unrelated to Wooten. She said that Monegan was dismissed for not adequately filling state trooper vacancies and fighting alcohol abuse problems, and because he "did not turn out to be a team player on budgeting issues." Monegan was offered a position as head of the Alcoholic Beverage Control board which he turned down. Palin acknowledged that "pressure could have been perceived to exist, although I have only now become aware of it." She suspended Frank Bailey, and apologized to Alaskans:
“Mr. Bailey was aware of my family's personal concerns about Trooper Wooten. It appears that he, though, tried to apply some pressure on my behalf and this was without ever discussing it with me and I apologize to Alaskans for this distraction.”

Now if we are to take everything from Obama/Biden at face value (Biden's reference to knowledge of how the middle class man is affected by the current economic situation when he named a closed restaurant and home depot even though his perfectly manicured hands and handy man service bills speak otherwise. Obama speaking against William Ayer and his relation to William Ayer saying that he denounces the acts the Ayer participated in yet will still contribute to a cause Ayer is now a big part of) then should we not give Sarah Palin and John McCain the same courtesy. She says that she wasn't involved she fired people that were believed to be involved, and not even Monegan (the gentleman that was fired by Palin, for those that aren't keeping up) can point a finger directly at Palin.

The State legislative board investigating Palin was led by a Democrat that before the investigation was completely underway mentioned that the report might come as a October Surprise. This might have been a vain attempt to get his name in the news but it also shows that he isn't really looking for hard evidence but anything at all that he can use to connect Palin to this "Troopergate" scandal. The whole reason there is an investigation is to pay due diligence to a concern of ethics in the actions of Sarah Palin. Now that they have done their investigation and concluded that there was a questionable connection and a ethical breach in her conduct (no more of a breach then when Sandy Berger destroyed files or the affair in the White House under Clinton) in office can we move on and get into the meat and potatoes of the matters
Comment: #2
Posted by: Chrisoflucas
Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:45 AM
Re: Chrisoflucas; Jeez Chris, why all the words??? They only accused her of being unethical. No one accused her of being intelligent. Until you have a battle, why fight a war??? Until rank no longer has its privilages no one can make a devil of any one for the simple use of power for personal gain or advantage. Do you get my drift here??? She may be unethical, but in a frontier town the sheriff makes the law... My question to you would be.... Haven't we sent enough people to Washington with no respect for ethics or the law??? ..Thanks....Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Oct 16, 2008 5:19 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Joe Conason
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

11 Jun 2009 Why So Scared of a Public Plan?

25 Jan 2007 Why Bush's Speech Didn't Matter

8 Mar 2007 A Partisan Purge Too Far