creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Jim Hightower
Jim Hightower
16 Apr 2014
NSA Spying Is Here to Stay

On Monday, April 14, the the Washington Post and the Guardian US newspapers received the Pulitzer for … Read More.

9 Apr 2014
Sniffing the Ethical rot in Wall Street's Culture

Not too many years ago, any news story about bonus money would've been about some 20-year-old baseball player &#… Read More.

2 Apr 2014
Let's Re-fund America

The powerhouses of Wall Street have tunneled directly into the cloistered backrooms of Washington deal making,… Read More.

IRS Should Outlaw All “Social Welfare” Political Fronts -- Left and Right

Comment

If you're covered in political stink, it might be prudent to avoid yelling "dirty politics" at others.

Lately, a mess of right-wing tea party groups have been wailing nonstop that they have been targeted, harassed and denied their civic rights by partisan, out-of-control, Obamanistic IRS thugs (no adjective too extreme when assailing Obama or the IRS). The groups certainly are right that it's abhorrent for a powerful agency to run a repressive witch hunt against any group of citizens just because of their political views. After all, liberals have frequently felt the lash of such official repression by assorted McCarthyite-Nixonite-Cheneyite forces over the years, and it must be condemned, no matter who the victims.

In this case, however, the right-wing groups were not targeted by government snoops and political operatives, but tagged by their own applications to be designated by the IRS as 501(c)(4) "social welfare" groups. This privileged status would allow them to take unlimited bags of corporate cash without ever revealing to voters the names of the corporations putting up the money. The caveat is that 501(c)(4)s are supposed to do actual social welfare work and cannot be attached to any candidate or party, nor can politics be their primary purpose.

Forget what the rule says, though. Such notorious political players as Karl Rove and the Koch brothers have cynically set up their own pretend-welfare groups, openly using them as fronts to run secret-money election campaigns. Suddenly, hundreds of wannabe outfits were demanding that they be given the special hide-the-money designation, too, brazenly lying about their overt political purpose. Some even asserted that they were engaged in no political activity, when their own websites bragged that they were.

It was these groups' stupidity and audacity that prompted the IRS inquiries, and their current hissy fit about the agency is really just a PR effort to let them continue their "social welfare" fraud.

I think of a "social welfare charity" as being an altruistic enterprise, like The Little Sisters of the Poor — not the avaricious Little Koch Brothers of the Plutocracy.

Yet the brothers have created their very own 501(c)(4) charity, which they used last year as a political front group for funneling $39 million into campaigns against Democrats. Interesting, since, the law bans these tax-exempt entities from spending more than 49 percent of their funding on political efforts to promote their "issues."

Yet, there they are — hoards of political (c)(4)s, mostly right-wing, operating primarily as political pipelines for secretly gushing corporate money into raw, partisan campaigns. Their hocus-pocus lawyers and congressional consiglieres have badgered the IRS into handing them the (c)(4) get-out-of-jail-free card, then defied the agency to stop them as they dump millions of corrupt dollars into our elections.

For example, American Action Network, a "charity" created by Wall Street lobbyists, has spent two-thirds of its revenue on elections, including putting up $745,000 from secret donors to elect Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin. How ironic, then, that Johnson is now one of the tea party mad dogs howling at IRS officials.

It's scandalous, Johnson shrieks, that some tea party groups have not been given (c)(4) status, because IRS agents have had the temerity to question whether the groups actually are charitable enterprises — or just rank political outfits fraudulently posing as charities.

While tea party groups should not be singled out for IRS scrutiny, neither should they be allowed to cheat in elections by shamefully masquerading as Little Sisters of the Poor. That's the real IRS scandal.

To find out more about Jim Hightower, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators webpage at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Jim shamelessly rips into conservative groups for using 501 groups to promote their agenda, but never mentions that liberal groups are doing the same thing.
Here is the answer: Greatly diminish the power of the IRS. Eliminate it completely. Rip it out by its root.
Comment: #1
Posted by: ray
Tue Jun 4, 2013 9:12 PM
Re: ray I agree, but then what would hightower have to whine about?
Comment: #2
Posted by: David Henricks
Wed Jun 5, 2013 8:05 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Jim Hightower
Apr. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 18 Apr 2014
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 18 Apr 2014
Suzanne Fields
Suzanne FieldsUpdated 18 Apr 2014

24 Jun 2009 Today's Perpetrators of Gas Pump Thievery

6 Mar 2013 Let's Adopt These Planks From GOP's National Platform

10 Apr 2013 Where's the Cop on the Wall Street Beat?