creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Jim Hightower
Jim Hightower
23 May 2012
Snarling Banks

We're sick and tired of being bullied and stomped on by the Powers That Be in Washington, and by gollies, we'… Read More.

16 May 2012
Anheuser-Busch, Drunk on Greed

Big brewers like Anheuser-Busch frequently admonish us imbibers of their grain products to "drink responsibly.… Read More.

9 May 2012
Making Chemical Giants Happy at Our Expense

Thanks to the blessings of nature and good farmers, you and I can enjoy such scrumptious delights as fresh corn-on-the-cob,… Read More.

Ethics, Health Care, Guns and Congress Critters

Share Comment

This new Republican-run House of Representatives is looking a lot like the old ethics-be-damned House run just a few years ago by the convicted money-launderer, Tom DeLay — only more so.

Back when DeLay was the GOP's corrupt majority leader, he got caught hustling campaign funds from an energy corporation whose legislation he then helped pass. This flagrant exchange of corporate cash for legislative favors was so stinky that even DeLay's pals on the ethics committee had to slap his wrist, ruling in 2004 that a Congress critter should not engage in fundraising "that gives even an appearance that donors will receive ... special treatment."

Now, fast forward to last year, when the independent investigative arm of the House ethics committee charged two Republicans (Tom Price of Georgia and John Campbell of California) and one Democrat (Joe Crowley of New York) with DeLay-style money hustles.

The investigators found compelling proof that these powerful members collected checks from Wall Street lobbyists just before voting the bankers' way on regulatory reforms. Emails and other incriminating documents show that Crowley even left the Capitol while the House was debating the reforms so he could attend the fundraiser being thrown for him at the home of a banking lobbyist. He then returned to the floor to vote against the reforms, exactly as his grinning Wall Street donors wanted.

The punishment for these miscreants? None. In one of its first acts this year, the "new" ethics committee merrily dropped all charges against their delighted colleagues. In an Alice-in-Wonderland moment, the committee declared on Jan. 26 that there was no connection between the vote and the cash, adding that no "reasonable" person would see even an appearance of impropriety in the exchange.

Excuse me for being unreasonable, but it appears obvious that what the committee has done is to set an ethical standard for this Congress that's even lower than the dark days of Tom DeLay.

And that's going some!

Still, it's nice to know that whenever America faces a big issue, we can always count on Congress to be there.

For themselves, that is.

Take health care. Corporate-funded front groups churned out a mess of lies to foment public opposition to Obama's rather modest insurance reform, demonizing it as a "government takeover" of our health care system. It was no such thing, but that hasn't stopped Republican lawmakers from making a theatrical show of trying to repeal Obama's reform and "save" the people from the horrors of socialized medicine.

Yet, in all their blathering, few of them have offered to save themselves from the horrors of taxpayer-provided health care. Congress critters get Cadillac coverage at our expense, plus they have their own in-house bevy of government doctors to attend to them. Why don't they vote to eliminate this privileged bastion of socialism?

Then there's the real horror of gun violence that exploded most recently in Arizona. In response, members of Congress rushed forward with creative solutions. It's all about public safety, they exclaimed — by which they meant saving themselves from the public.

Rep. Peter King of New York showed what he's made of by introducing legislation making it a federal crime to carry a gun within the vicinity of — guess who? — a congressperson. Rep. Dan Burton of Indiana proposed a very specific job stimulus program — he wanted Capitol Hill workers to seal off the House gallery with bulletproof glass to shield the skittish solons from the people. And a couple of members took a bold stand for individual responsibility by announcing that they would henceforth show their respect for constituents by packing pistols when going out amongst them.

Good grief, don't they do enough damage by shooting off their mouths? I don't know about you, but I don't think members of Congress should be trusted with real guns. At least not until they show themselves to be able to pass a sanity test.

To find out more about Jim Hightower, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Hey jimmy, don't forgot about the honorable Charles Rangel since your lumping them into a bunch. And I cannot agree more about congress wanting us to have taxpayer provided health care, when they get Cadillac coverage at our expense. (But then all of the health care programs are at OUR EXPENSE). I can't quite figure out the difference between taxpayer health care and the CADILLAC Plans. Do they know something that we don't know. (Like maybe the taxpayer Provided Health care plan is going to SUCK) But that's ok, the UAW workers will also get that CADILLAC plan also.(Which by the way, taxpayers are paying for also)
And last but not least, gun control. I believe in gun control. I can legally carry a gun and it's too bad I was not in Tuscan to put and end to the killing spree. Because with good gun control I would have put one right between his eyes. (and saved tax dollars to boot)
Comment: #1
Posted by: political_sense
Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:59 PM
I can get great health "care". What you, and your liberal/progressive/socialist/commie cohorts don't seem to understand is that the federal government has no right to tell me to buy heath "insurance" Two, distincly different things. The Constitution of the United States does not provide for (no matter how lawyers and bureaucrats twist words) the federal government to mandate buying anything. There are two choices, only. Capitalism with its flaws or socialism with its history of failure. You have chosen your side. Go to Cuba or Mexico or Egypt and try to promote your rants. Only in America are you free to bloviate without death or prison hanging over your head. Blather on, but be prepared for unintended consequences should you ever see your short-sited schemes come to fruition.
Comment: #2
Posted by: David Henricks
Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:08 PM
Repubicans vote unanimously to fund Israel which enables Israeli's to have socialized medicine. The same Repubicans scream like banshee's when to pass a single 10 cent aspirin for Americans while subsidizing socialized medicine for Israel.
Comment: #3
Posted by: kien lusk
Sun Feb 20, 2011 6:04 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Jim Hightower
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

4 Aug 2010 Fighting Back Against the Banksters

19 Aug 2009 Taking Us for a Ride on Health Care

22 Feb 2012 Cooperatives Over Corporations