creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Hillary Rodham Clinton
1 Jan 2008
Talking It Over

EDITORS NOTE: The following column is the first syndicated column written by Hillary Clinton for Creators Syndicate.… Read More.

27 Dec 2000
Talking It Over

When I was a child, we decorated our family tree on Christmas Eve. With only one to decorate, we could afford … Read More.

20 Dec 2000
Talking It Over

The Women's Bank occupies a one-room building in western India. The teller's counter is an old kitchen table … Read More.

Talking It Over

Share Comment

The summer of '98, with its record-breaking heat, has seen disaster strike every part of the country. Residents of Texas endured 29 straight days of temperatures over 100 degrees, killing more than 100 people. Wildfires consumed over half a million acres of land in Florida, and tornadoes wreaked havoc in Minnesota, Michigan, New York and Pennsylvania.

Last week, I traveled to Milwaukee, where devastating floods have caused millions of dollars in damage for the second year in a row. There, I spoke with victims and saw firsthand the destruction inflicted on homes and businesses.

If you think natural disasters today are taking a greater toll on the country than in the past, you're right. Between 1988 and 1992, there were an average of 44 major disaster declarations each year. Since then, that number has risen to 60, in part due to El Nino, La Nina and the effects of global warming.

Since 1992, when Hurricane Andrew devastated parts of southern Florida, the United States has suffered disasters unprecedented in scope and cost, including the Midwest floods in 1993, the Northridge earthquake in 1994, Hurricanes Marilyn and Fran in 1995 and 1996, and the Red River floods in 1997.

When Hurricane Andrew tore through 50 miles of southern Florida on Aug. 24, 1992, it left nearly 200,000 residents homeless and 1.3 million without electricity. But the Federal Emergency Management Agency, charged with responding to disasters, was fighting another battle altogether.

Most of FEMA's activities were focused on planning for nuclear attack. It took three days before FEMA representatives arrived on the scene of Andrew's devastation, and when they did, bureaucratic bungling kept victims frustrated and unable to get the help they so desperately needed.

Who can forget Dade County's Director of Emergency Management, Kate Hale, pleading, "We're doing everything we can. Where in the hell is the Calvary on this one?"

Besides being geared to civil defense, the agency lacked experience at the helm. Until my husband appointed the current head, James Lee Witt, no FEMA director had ever had any emergency-management experience. James Lee was in charge of Arkansas' Office of Emergency Services before coming to Washington, and Bill knew that if anyone could turn FEMA around, he could.

Since taking office, Witt has cut bureaucratic red tape and focused on getting aid to victims and communities.

Where once a form had to be mailed to Washington before a claim could be processed, now a phone call gets the ball rolling. Virtually overnight, this important agency, once considered the worst in the federal government, has developed a reputation for speed and efficiency.

Tom Feuerborne, director of Oklahoma's Civil Emergency Management Department, remembers FEMA's response on April 19, 1995. At 9:02 a.m., a truck bomb shattered the Murrah Federal Building. At 9:30, Feuerborne called FEMA. By 2:05, its advance team was on the scene, and by 8:10 that night, Witt himself had arrived to survey the devastation. Feuerborne declares, "My office is very happy with the quick response."

But James Lee Witt has not been satisfied merely to respond to disaster. One of the most important initiatives that he has undertaken at FEMA — Project Impact — is shifting the agency's focus away from picking up the pieces AFTER a flood or hurricane to taking steps to reduce losses BEFORE disaster strikes.

Project Impact helps local communities form a partnership of government leaders, business representatives and individuals to arrange funding, in-kind services, technical support and labor to undertake disaster-resistant activities. FEMA offers seed money and technical assistance to get these projects started.

Last April, as part of Project Impact, AmeriCorps volunteers fanned out across the country to help five communities prepare for future natural disasters. In Oakland, Calif., students spent their spring break helping residents make their homes more resistant to earthquakes by bracing bookshelves and water heaters and moving heavy objects to prevent injuries.

In Pascagoula, Miss., high school volunteers helped the homebound and the disabled prepare their homes for potential disaster. Jim Young, Pascagoula's City Manager, sums Project Impact up best: "It's good economic sense and good common sense."

Witt explains: "It takes years for people, businesses and communities to recover emotionally and financially from even the smallest disasters. But there are actions that we can take to reduce these costs."

He estimates that every dollar spent in mitigation before a disaster will save $2 in the future. And, given that we spend an average of $2.5 billion every five years on disaster relief, Project Impact does make good sense.

As we grieve for the victims of disaster around the country this summer, we should all remember the hard-working men and women of FEMA and thank them for the great job they're doing.

For more information about how FEMA can help you and your community become disaster resistant, you can call 1-800-480-2520 or visit its website at www.fema.gov.

To find out more about Hillary Rodham Clinton and read her past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 1998 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Dear Senator Clinton,
You probably will never see this email, however it is worth suggestig the following:
Why don't you run for theINDEPENDENT PARTY?
Joe Lieberman did when he lost the Democratic race and won.
You would start out with a majority of the popular democratic votes -- NO SUPER DELAGATES,ETC ARE INVOLVED.
I think you have an good chance to add to your current voter base with Independants, Your democrats, Republicans and Undecided voters.
You would be giving up your Secure democratic status and thus future democratic support -- BUT you would have a chance to achieve a landmark historical accomplishment.
Comment: #1
Posted by: leonard wolby
Fri Jun 6, 2008 8:18 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Jan. `08
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

19 Jan 2000 Talking It Over

13 Jan 1998 Talking It Over

10 Jun 1998 Talking It Over