creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Froma Harrop
Froma Harrop
14 Feb 2012
French Model for American Parents

One item in the annals of American exceptionalism is how exceptionally badly behaved American children are. … Read More.

9 Feb 2012
Big Brother Is ‘Sharing'

My, how you've changed, Big Brother. What happened to the sourpuss in "1984," George Orwell's grim … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
What Komen Affair Means for November

The blowup at Susan G. Komen for the Cure set off a political alarm that Republicans dare not ignore. The … Read More.

The Liberal Lion, With Asterisks

Share Comment

They called him "The Liberal Lion." Ted Kennedy deserved that title, though with some asterisks added. There's no reconciling Kennedy worshippers with the Kennedy haters. But those who can deal with shades of gray will pay tribute to the legendary Massachusetts senator who championed landmark legislation through bipartisan cooperation — but whose sense of family privilege didn't always serve the interests of democracy.

No one can deny Kennedy's contributions. He pushed through the Civil Rights Act, Freedom of Information Act and the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Through his odd-couple relationship with Utah conservative Sen. Orrin Hatch, Kennedy helped win major AIDS legislation. And we hope that his four-decade crusade to extend health coverage to all Americans will end in victory this year.

Less commendable was the senator's penchant for capitalizing on Kennedy nostalgia to further family interests. Ted's three brothers died young and under tragic circumstances. Joe fell heroically in World War II. Two brothers, President John F. Kennedy and New York Sen. Bobby Kennedy, were assassinated. Kennedy used the powerful brew of public emotion to fuel unwarranted political ambition.

Ted did not create the Kennedy Dynasty: While he was in diapers, his father Joe was already long on the project. True democrats (with a small "d") frown on the notion of ruling families, but Ted tirelessly worked the "Kennedy mystique" to advance himself and kin.

After Bobby died, Ted made this claim to the presidency: "Like my brothers before me, I pick up a fallen standard." That would have been a fine speech for a Shakespearean prince assuming his father's throne. But it should have troubled a country born out of opposition to hereditary rule more than it did.

Then Chappaquiddick happened, and the closest he would ever come to the presidency was a 1980 protest challenge against incumbent Jimmy Carter.

Questions still swirl around Kennedy's conduct that night, when he drove a car off a bridge and a female passenger drowned. That and his expulsion from Harvard for cheating on a test would have ended most political careers, but Kennedy had the family name to propel him into a 47-year tenure in the Senate.

Kennedy subsequently "placed" his son Patrick into a House seat from Rhode Island. Patrick is a very appealing person, but his serial problems with drugs and alcohol — crises that continue — should have disqualified him for this kind of responsibility.

Earlier this year, Kennedy tried to slip his niece Caroline Kennedy into the New York Senate seat left vacant when Hillary Clinton became secretary of state. Several hard-working New York Democrats were already vying for that office. Caroline had never run for anything and proved herself temperamentally unsuited for the rough-and-tumble. Still, it was startling to see an airhead faction of the Democratic elite so eager to throw their longtime public servants overboard for Kennedy sparkle.

In the year since Ted's dire diagnosis, Massachusetts Democrats have been pondering which Kennedy will take his Senate seat, as though the voters have little to do with it. "According to local conventional wisdom," writes Joan Vennochi in The Boston Globe, Bobby's son Joe "has the right of first refusal." (Tom Paine must be turning in his grave.)

America was founded on ideas, not royal families. That's why recent talk of lawmakers' voting for health care reform as "a tribute to Ted Kennedy" is so off base. Congress should pass it because the legislation would be good for the country. And if in doing so, they wish to praise Kennedy's fine ideas and hard work in creating the reforms, that would be entirely appropriate.

May the good that Ted Kennedy has done live after him.

To find out more about Froma Harrop, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL CO.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Ms. Harrop,

Shame on you! Ted Kennedy's funeral is tomorrow, and you chose to write a column not on his life of helping the 'powerless' but to join the likes of Malkin in portraying Kennedy as a man of many flaws. Why would you not wait until after his funeral to jump on the bandwagon of sensational journalism?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Jack Lee
Fri Aug 28, 2009 5:55 AM
If Kennedy's death inspires others to rise above partisan politics and pass good health care legislation, that will reflect admiration for his work as an individual, not dynasty-worship. The emotional pull of "winning one for the Gipper" might do some real good in this case.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Lois Rosow
Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:32 AM
Ms Harrop,
Shame on you!
Miss Mary Jo Kopechne dead all these years and you still can't personalize her by using her name.
Just some staffer(whatever). His brothers's former staffer( whatever).
And as he CHEATED-paid someone wasn't it?
on a Spanish
exam at univerity of virginia.
I'll bet he still wasn't BI-LINGUAL.
Except maybe russian.
Comment: #3
Posted by: STM
Sat Aug 29, 2009 1:24 AM
Brilliant column - one of your best (published in the Spokane Spokesman-Review - 9/29). With all due respect, however, may I take issue with two of your statements.
#1 - "We hope that his four-decade crusade to extended health coverage to all Americans will end this year". Who is "WE"? "We" is clearly not the millions of Americans who have taken the time to read and understand the truth about the nationalized health care legislation currently being proposed and are vigorously opposed to it. I suggest you read the Charles Krauthammer column (A back door to health reform) published the same day.
#2 - "Congress should pass it because the legislation would be good for the country". By who's assessment? Certainly not the CBO's and, based on extensive polling, most of the the US population.
That, and the way Senator Kennedy publically trashed anyone who dared to hold positions different from his aside (ex. Robert Bork), your column put him and his contribution to our Country in proper prospective.
Keith LaMotte
Spokane, WA
Comment: #4
Posted by: cougartrumpetdude
Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:59 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Froma Harrop
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

7 Aug 2007 Rich Suburbs Move to Democrats

9 Apr 2009 Let's End Energy Policy Whipsaw

26 Mar 2009 Springtime for New England Republicans?