creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Froma Harrop
Froma Harrop
24 May 2012
Bain And Our Screwed-Up Culture

We recently saluted Leslie Sabo for giving his life to save fellow soldiers in Vietnam 40 years ago. Injured … Read More.

22 May 2012
The United States of Gambling

A surprising fact: Gamblers spent more last year at commercial casinos in Indiana than they did at non-Indian … Read More.

17 May 2012
Grief Is Not a Mental Illness

We moderns seem determined to suppress all unhappiness with one exception: grief. The intense sadness … Read More.

The Five Commandments of Tax Reform

Share Comment

The tax code needs fixing to be fairer and less complex. But let's set some rules for this debate. Here are the Five Commandments of Tax Reform:

Thou shall simplify with care: Rep. Paul Ryan, Republican of Wisconsin, proposes a much simplified income-tax system. Gosh darn, you can do your taxes on a postcard.

His system is simple, all right. Simply put, working people pay all the income taxes, and the idle rich pay little or nothing. Here's how it works:

Couples with taxable income up to $100,000 ($50,000 for single filers) would pay a 10 percent tax rate. Those with higher income would pay 25 percent. There would be no more special deductions, exclusions or credits, except a health-care tax credit.

But interest, capital gains and dividends would not be taxed at all. It happens that the higher one's income, the more of that money comes on average from investments rather than the sweat of one's brow. The richest 400 taxpayers in 2007 (average income $345 million) made less than 7 percent of their total from salaries. Thus, Ryan would exempt 93 percent of their income from taxation — while subjecting 100 percent of their gardener's. Nice try.

The rich shall pay more: Capital gains and corporate dividends are currently taxed at 15 percent. The wages of police officers, computer programmers and other solidly middle-class workers are taxed at far higher rates.

Democrats want to raise the rate on capital gains and dividends for upper-income Americans to 20 percent. Republicans howl that the higher rate would discourage "saving."

But recall that the sainted Ronald Reagan backed a hike in the capital-gains tax to 28 percent for high earners, up from 20 percent. Reagan reasoned that since the marginal rates were being slashed, there was no more justification for giving a special deal to rich investors.

Perhaps he deserves the halo after all.

The middle class shall pay something: You can understand why Democrats would limit new tax increases to upper-income folk, who enjoyed enormous tax cuts during the George W. Bush era. A correction was in order.

But eventually everyone must pitch in. Politicians can't go on telling the middle class that it can enjoy new entitlements, and keep the ones it has, without paying more taxes.

The difficulty of getting this message across makes the VAT (value-added tax) a righteous idea. A kind of national sales tax, the VAT is considered regressive because the poor also pay it. But the social programs these taxes fund are progressive.

Thou shall not lie about the poor: It's not true that the poor don't pay taxes. They don't pay income taxes. But they do pay sales taxes, as well as payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare.

Many states raise revenues through casinos, lotteries and other gambling activities, which low-income Americans heavily patronize. The poor also smoke and drink. Tobacco and alcohol are steeply taxed.

Thou shall not lie with numbers: Honest numbers can be used for false purposes. The top 1 percent of taxpayers do pay 40 percent of all federal income taxes. That sounds dramatic only until one sees how much dough this elite group rakes in.

The top 1 percent of households earns 23 percent of all adjusted gross income. It owns 35 percent of the national wealth. It received two-thirds of America's total gain in income from 2002 to 2007. Despite its "tax burden," the top 1 percent continues to pull away economically from everyone else.

The income tax remains one of those few progressive parts of the tax code: Those who can most afford it pay more taxes. Where's the problem?

Are the rich getting soaked? Yes, in a bath of champagne.

To find out more about Froma Harrop, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL CO.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
Ms. Harrup-
The statement that "the rich are getting soaked..." sounds like wealth envy to me. If you don't call yourself "rich" why is that? Is it the choice you made to become a writer? Is it my or another person's fault that you are not getting soaked in champagne?

And, to state that the people with low-incomes tend to gamble or smoke or drink implies that they are victims instead of paying patrons of an establishment. There are middle class people who smoke, drink and gamble aren't there? The rich as well. And so what? The poor still get all the benefits of what those who PAY taxes, don't they?

You typify another kind of elitist with your wealth envy. Our family has been unemployed twice in 4 years. We have lost our savings and retirement because of it. But surprise, that my "wealth" has been cut to 1/3 of what I made before does not make me a victim or jealous of those who have more than I do, nor does it want to make me put my hand out because I am tired of "suffering" the ills of unemployment and now, someone else should have to cover me.

It makes me grateful to live in a place that even if facing bankruptcy, or loss of everything, I can still produce and be self-sufficient. And we are.

PS- The tax cuts were across the board, so if you paid income taxes, you benefited. Why is it that people like you still insist that it was not fair? How was it fair that people who paid no income tax got a check? In the real world, I call that welfare. I suppose you call it "economic justice".
Comment: #1
Posted by: Nee
Fri Apr 9, 2010 6:48 AM
Tax reform sounds great. I pay about 50 cents of every dollar to taxes. Lessening that burden I doubt is your point. Suggesting the "poor" pay taxes by gambling, drinking and smoking shows you are more about agenda than critical thought.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Jeffrey Williams
Fri Apr 9, 2010 6:00 PM
Ms. Harrup,

Your article begins from such a far left position that the logic almost makes sense. But that's not what the free enterprise system is about. Nor should it be what America is about. Progressive taxes are illicit at best. We need a cap on how much ANYONE can pay in a year regardless of income. And a life time cap should be placed on all federal taxes. Once you've paid the max, you are exempt. After all how much national defense and postal services and regulation of interstate commerce can any one person use.

I recently bought a 4 year old Lexus because it seemed like a great value. A young man I work with asked my logic and he soon bought a 4 year old Lexus for his wife and new baby. I probably make in a month what he makes in a year, but the two automobiles cost about the same because the market determines the value. No one arbitrarily decides that because I have a higher income, i should pay more for my used Lexus than he pays.

We need to get government back on the same basis. Everybody should pay an annual amount, then the government should live on it... budgeting their outflows to fall within their inflows, just as I'm sure you must do and I do. If something BIG happens, like a war, then the government should be required to borrow the extra needed from the people through bond sales. The rate should float. Whenever the people feel they are not getting value they need to have an avenue to remove politicians. " Spendthrift" should be one of the grounds for impeachment. It is for corporate executives.

Certainly, there are some people who have tragedies for which they should be able to apply for exemption from paying their National taxes. That would be reasonable providing that while they are on furlough, they may not vote in national elections.

Finally, we must revisit 1964 and admit that the Great Society was a grand experiment and a super idea if it had worked, but by every measure an absolute failure. We should abandon social engineering through government; put welfare back on the state's shoulders, allowing the local voters to opt for more, less or none. Read Star Parker's Uncle Sam's Plantation. We have created a self perpetuating sub class of citizens. They are much worse off now than they were in 1964.

Obviously, I disagree with your "commanment" that the rich should pay more. I think the big difference in our thought processes is I believe when people earn money, it is their money which they should use a portion of to purchase GOOD government. Somehow you seem to think it's Washingoton's money and the only problem is how much they should allow us to have.

SRH
Comment: #3
Posted by: S. R. Hinds
Sat Apr 10, 2010 12:10 PM
Dear Ms Harrop, each of your five commandments is met most elegantly by The FairTax (HR25). Why don't you read that bill, understand how it is our best solution to the problems you've written about, and aggressively promote its passage?

That way, instead of arguing for more costly complexity and nurturing a never-ending corrosive battle among special interest groups for the next gift from the indecipherable income tax code, you can help bring simplicity, obvious fairness, efficiency, transparency and stability to the system of funding the federal government.
Comment: #4
Posted by: James Baird
Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:40 AM
Why does the financially strapped newspaper industry insist on buying and printing the mooncalf musings of socialist columnist Froma Harrop?
She has zero original thought and seems to only regurgitate the proven failed dictum of the socialist agenda.
Her rants are so formulaic one must wonder if she is even real or just a computer program written on an stolen Apple IIe by a graduate student at Moscow University in Havana Cuba.
After reading her current bit of bunk in the PROVIDENCE JOURNAL, ask yourself this: Why should anyone pay more for the same exact service as anyone else?
Should a millionaire pay more for the exact same loaf of bread, as does a hardware store clerk simply because she has more money?
Should billionaires pay more than janitors for the exact same exact haircut with the same exact barber simply because they are richer?
How is this possibly fair?
Yet this is what Froma is saying should be done with a progressive tax.
Progressive taxes are NEVER fair. Socialism is NEVER fair.
What happened to fair Froma?
This is not the vision of the Founding Fathers of this nation comrade Harrop; no, this is the mindset of Carl Marx. Use class warfare to derive power. Use the envy of the rich to manipulate the poor and middle classes.
The 70+ year experiment in socialism failed miserably Froma. It led to the most brutal nations ever to have existed in history. Over 150 million people violently died prematurely at the hands of their own socialist countrymen in the 20th century alone. Why on earth would anyone champion any socialist precepts in an attempt to rejuvenate such a proven anti-human governmental system is mind-boggling.
C'mon PROVIDENCE JOURNAL, you can do better than this….
Comment: #5
Posted by: M. W. Monroe
Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:16 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Froma Harrop
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

25 May 2010 What Were They (Politicians) Thinking?

12 Jan 2010 Why Profiling Can't Ensure Airline Security

26 Apr 2012 Immigration Becomes a New Story