creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Froma Harrop
Froma Harrop
24 May 2012
Bain And Our Screwed-Up Culture

We recently saluted Leslie Sabo for giving his life to save fellow soldiers in Vietnam 40 years ago. Injured … Read More.

22 May 2012
The United States of Gambling

A surprising fact: Gamblers spent more last year at commercial casinos in Indiana than they did at non-Indian … Read More.

17 May 2012
Grief Is Not a Mental Illness

We moderns seem determined to suppress all unhappiness with one exception: grief. The intense sadness … Read More.

The American Dream Is Not All About Money

Share Comment

We always talk about "The American Dream" — about living it, saving it, wondering what happened to it. Few bother to define it.

The stereotype shows a single-family house, with white-picket fence, Mom and Dad, Dick and Jane. A mansion rarely comes to mind, unless obtained by someone born in grinding poverty. It's never portrayed as a modest apartment.

This American Dream is squarely middle class and rests on tangibles. I never cared much for this materialistic vision, but understand its pull.

"The American Dream for me, growing up in India in the 1970s, looked something like the opening credits of 'Dallas,'" Fareed Zakaria opens his Time magazine piece called "Restoring the American Dream." It was shiny skyscrapers, sexy women and rich cowboys.

Zakaria says that when he later moved to the United States as a college student, classmates would invite him to their large suburban houses filled with gleaming appliances. He was amazed that his friends' parents often held only modest jobs.

"The modern American Dream for me," he writes, "was this general prosperity and well-being for the average person," which brings him to the article's theme. America's middle class fears the end of this general prosperity. The modest jobs that delivered the handsome suburban houses are going to places like India, where equally smart people are happy to work for far less. The concern, not unwarranted, is that they're not coming back.

To many, here and abroad, the American Dream is over. But that's only if one subscribes to the easy abundance version of it. Yes, impoverished immigrants from Latin America, Asia and elsewhere still see a land of plenty. We often forget, though, that foreigners sought the Dream for complex reasons.

The Pilgrims immigrated in the early 17th century to avoid religious persecution.

Similar motives later attracted the Pennsylvania Dutch, Jews and numerous others. Many sought to escape the mayhem of war, from the Germans in the mid-19th century to Cambodians in the "killing fields" of the late 20th.

For millions, the American Dream meant freedom from starvation. In the 19th century, the Irish fled the potato blight and Swedes disastrous crop failures.

Others came to America not to reinvent themselves, but to preserve their threatened cultures. Such was the case for Mennonites from Northern Europe and Germans from Russia. Not every newcomer coveted the flashy accessories of the emerging consumer society.

Note that for many immigrants, then and now, the bottom line was not wealth but physical survival. Today's "lost boys" of southern Sudan were children sent away by desperate parents to fend for themselves — anything to escape the murderous government-backed militias. One of them, Joseph Gayoung Khan, miraculously ended up in America and on the dean's list at the University of Iowa. Khan's most prized possession will not be the diploma (or his white Isuzu Rodeo), but his very existence.

The term "American Dream" first appeared in a Depression-era book titled "The Epic of America." (Thank you, Fareed Zakaria, for informing us.) Its author, James Truslow Adams, defines the Dream as "a better, richer and happier life for all our citizens of every rank ... ."

The reference to a "happier" life can mean things other than things. For a middle class rattled by the shifting economic ground, happiness can come in the form of healthy children, friendships and less stress about keeping up unrealistic levels of consumption.

Perhaps today's middle class can't maintain its current "standard of living." Given what's out there, a somewhat lower American standard of living is not shabby at all. And we must never forget that for people like Joseph Gatyoung Khan, the American Dream can mean life itself.

To find out more about Froma Harrop, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL CO.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Froma:
You are correct, the American Dream is not about money, it about something far more valuable, FREEDOM. You are right when you say that freedom of worship and the freedom from fear attracted many immigrants to this new land. But it was the freedom to control your own destiny that excited and energized the vast majority of people in America. And this is the freedom that has been most threatened in the last several years.
Everyone is free to worship as they choose – so long as they don't do it in public or on public property or anywhere it might offend someone. People can live without fear of the government – so long as one of the many federal, state, or local police forces do not identify them to the press as a “person of interest” in an investigation or execute an unsigned sneak-and-peak search warrant of their home, bank accounts, library books, work site, or anything else of interest to big brother.
People are free to work hard and succeed at their chosen occupation – unless they become a doctor, banker, or insurance salesperson, then the President can go on the campaign trail and call them greedy, selfish, and only interested in profit. Of course lawyers are exempt from these political attacks because everyone knows that lawyers never make any money.
People with a dream of how do build a better mouse trap are free to start their own business – so long as they comply with many thousands of pages of federal, state, and local rules, regulations, permits, and pay more than 50 percent of their income in taxes.
America's middle class does not fear the end of general prosperity, they fear the emergence of an overbearing and totalitarian government that regulates and controls every aspect of their lives. America's middle class fears the ever expanding government and the continuing loss of freedom in the name of safety and security.
Remember – The Soviet Union police state that existed in the 1960s had almost zero unemployment and safe streets in every major city. A return to this type of government is what the American middle class fears.
Comment: #1
Posted by: MoneyMatters
Thu Dec 2, 2010 5:03 AM
"This American Dream is squarely middle class and rests on tangibles. I never cared much
for this materialistic vision, but understand its pull."

That's what we need, someone who completely misunderstands the American Dream defining it and regulating it around their own misconceptions.

Our "materialistic" vision is not spiritual enough for Harrop? This week I had to fill out a form for our local public school defining my children by race. If I did not fill out the form an "observer" from the school district would come in and define my children officially. I was informed that this is a federal mandate. Are the feds looking at my children spiritually or materially? Is the language and body movement scary to only me?

Froma, don't spend time defining my dreams because you are blind to them. Spend time criticizing the actions of a busy-body, over-reaching, and soulless government that is defined by material gain and power over people.

Get off the back of citizens and jump on the back of the real problem.

Comment: #2
Posted by: Tom
Thu Dec 2, 2010 6:35 AM
"This American Dream is squarely middle class and rests on tangibles. I never cared much
for this materialistic vision, but understand its pull."

That's what we need, someone who completely misunderstands the American Dream defining it and regulating it around their own misconceptions.

Our "materialistic" vision is not spiritual enough for Harrop? This week I had to fill out a form for our local public school defining my children by race. If I did not fill out the form an "observer" from the school district would come in and define my children officially. I was informed that this is a federal mandate. Are the feds looking at my children spiritually or materially? Is the language and body movement scary to only me?

Froma, don't spend time defining my dreams because you are blind to them. Spend time criticizing the actions of a busy-body, over-reaching, and soulless government that is defined by material gain and power over people.

Get off the back of citizens and jump on the back of the real problem.

Finally, libs do not want to keep Bush tax cuts. How would you difine that type of materialism? I never much cared for it, but understand its pull.



Comment: #3
Posted by: Tom
Thu Dec 2, 2010 6:48 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Froma Harrop
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

5 Feb 2008 "I Call You My Base"

29 Apr 2010 Is the Sunbelt Ready for Urbanity?

20 Feb 2007 Chafee Extends No Pity to War-Voting Democrats