creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Froma Harrop
Froma Harrop
24 May 2012
Bain And Our Screwed-Up Culture

We recently saluted Leslie Sabo for giving his life to save fellow soldiers in Vietnam 40 years ago. Injured … Read More.

22 May 2012
The United States of Gambling

A surprising fact: Gamblers spent more last year at commercial casinos in Indiana than they did at non-Indian … Read More.

17 May 2012
Grief Is Not a Mental Illness

We moderns seem determined to suppress all unhappiness with one exception: grief. The intense sadness … Read More.

No New Pledges

Share Comment

Among the Republicans vying for their party's presidential nomination, only former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson had the self-respect to denounce the ludicrous "Marriage Vow" pledge. Such pledges are a means through which small interest groups can make candidates crawl. The intimidation comes from their highly engaged members, who can affect the outcome of unrepresentative political contests — the upcoming Iowa caucuses being a good example.

For the record, Iowa is very much a swing state. As of July 1, Republicans accounted for 31 percent of Iowa's registered voters, Democrats 33 percent, and independents 36 percent. Yet small collections of fanatics can, in effect, threaten the political future of candidates who need to impress a wider electorate. Politicians' inability to say "no" to these pledges has hampered their ability to govern wisely in a complicated world.

Case in point: Many Republicans quake with fear at doing what they know they must to seriously address the deficit crisis — include new revenues alongside spending cuts. But year after year, they feel forced to sign a stupid promise to never raise any taxes no matter the reason. The misnamed Americans for Tax Reform keeps them in the harness by threatening their political destruction if they don't sign its pledge.

The group can't even wrap its head around the idea that ending some rich man's loophole might be considered part of "reform." Thus, we have Republicans rejecting a once-in-a-lifetime Democratic offer to cut four dollars of spending for every dollar of new revenues.

The no-tax pledge is more damaging to the country, but "The Marriage Vow: A Declaration of Dependence on Marriage and Family" is more embarrassing. The handiwork of a group called The Family Leader, "The Marriage Vow" demands that candidates oppose gay marriage and be personally faithful to their spouses. They must support "robust childbearing and reproduction" — and promise to protect American troops from "same-gender or opposite-gender sexual harassment, adultery" and so on (like Marines need their mothers).

The worst part is the long disquisition on "the crisis of marriage," with extra attention paid to fatherless children in the black community. It is a habit of largely white conservative groups to point out family dysfunction in the black community but not in theirs. One may be concerned that 70 percent of African-American babies are born to single mothers, but the white out-of-wedlock birthrate is rising faster. And how interesting that the first state to legalize gay marriage, Massachusetts, also has the lowest divorce rate.

Anyhow, Gary Johnson blasted this nonsense as "offensive and un-Republican." He said, "Government should not be involved in the bedrooms of consenting adults." And, "We need to maintain our position as the party of efficient government management and the watchdogs of the 'public's pocketbook.'" If there were more elected Republicans like Johnson, there were would be more Republicans.

While lacking the guts to slam the "The Marriage Vow," former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney at least had the decency to avoid signing it, as did former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman and Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty. (Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum and Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann jumped right in.)

The hope is that this growing resistance to the socially conservative busybodies will spread to the "no-tax" cult. Huntsman leads the way by forthrightly refusing to sign the no-taxes pledge.

Meanwhile, note a new CBS News Poll indicating that even 51 percent of Republicans disapprove of their party's performance in the debt-ceiling talks. Among the general public, disapproval of Republicans in Congress hits 71 percent.

Democrats have largely been spared the pledge brigades. Republicans should move forward in staring down the bullies, for the good of the country and themselves.

To find out more about Froma Harrop, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL CO.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
I have to think that, if we had a system of campaign finance that didn't rely on legalized bribery, then nutbags like Grover Norquist and Bob Vander Platts wouldn't have so much influence.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Steven Doyle
Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:34 AM
The problem with "new revenues" (new taxes) is that they always get implemented right away, while the tax cuts just never get around to taking effect. To pretend otherwise reflects either dishonesty or ignorance of history. A no-tax pledge is one way to keep liars out of office, those who say they will do X and then just not do it, or misrepresent the other side with a straw horse and then beat that to death, as Harrop does.

Her point about small minorities making candidates crawl is a good one, and it works from both ends of the political spectrum. Gays have forced how many candidates to take a stand on issues they would prefer to keep mum about? Rabid feminists represents a tiny minority of all women, yet wield disproportionate effect on candidates. The phony Al Sharpton represents himself only, yet he impacts the black community as if he were their elected rep, ably assisted by the liberal media that includes Froma Harrop.

Overwhelmingly, the "bullies" are on the Left, not the Right. Only the Left repeatedly shouts down speakers at events where they aren't even invited. Only the Left repeatedly riots to get its way. These are clear manifestations of bullying, as are Jesse Jackson's shakedowns, Al Sharpton's rabble rousing, ELF's and ALF's destructiveness, Greens sitting in trees for two years, on and on and on.

Let's hear about those, Froma. Otherwise we readers might get the impression that you don't care about balanced consideration of the political landscape, but just about scoring political points.
Comment: #2
Posted by: SaguaroJack
Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:38 AM
Bullies are overwhelmingly on the left? Surely that is meant in jest? I am a conservative and BOTH sides have their bullies! Or do you consider Rush an icon of reason?
Comment: #3
Posted by: Randy Eveland
Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:02 AM
Bullies are overwhelmingly on the left? Surely that is meant in jest? I am a conservative and BOTH sides have their bullies! Or do you consider Rush an icon of reason?
Comment: #4
Posted by: Randy Eveland
Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:02 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Froma Harrop
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

9 Jul 2009 Are Latinos Ethnics or a Racial Minority?

10 Apr 2012 Being in a Disaster as It Unfolds

6 May 2008 Cosby Is the Real Prophet, Not Wright