creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Froma Harrop
Froma Harrop
9 Feb 2012
Big Brother Is ‘Sharing'

My, how you've changed, Big Brother. What happened to the sourpuss in "1984," George Orwell's grim … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
What Komen Affair Means for November

The blowup at Susan G. Komen for the Cure set off a political alarm that Republicans dare not ignore. The … Read More.

2 Feb 2012
Immigration and ‘Obamacare' Join as Issue

Two of the hottest topics on the political circuit are illegal immigration and "Obamacare." They … Read More.

Mad Men in a Saner Time

Share Comment

"Mad Men" just won its third Emmy for "outstanding drama." If there were a gold statue for "best nostalgic portrayal," the AMC series would have walked off with that one, too. The allure and success of "Mad Men" is its stylish evocation of a lost era that many older Americans miss and younger ones envy.

Here is a New York advertising agency of the late 1950s and early 1960s, a time of guiltless smoking and drinking. Spouses cheat and nice single women get pregnant, as they do today. But a more orderly culture makes these falls from grace more interesting.

When the bouncing booty and foul-mouthed muscle-heads of other television shows go astray, who cares? The middle-class world of "Mad Men" has rules for comportment that make sin matter. When a man of character like Don Draper shows his weaknesses, we take note.

The scourge of racism bubbles under the show's pleasant surface. And the period's sexism may make moderns wince. But this is a show for grownups fascinated by a mannerly America not yet turned to chaos by the social upheavals to come.

Children in "Mad Men" are neatly dressed and taught etiquette. Girls don't wear nail polish, bare their navels or display cleavage in high school. The division between child and adult is still a valued concept. Eighth-graders don't have sex lives, and parents think that being mature is a good thing. The family dinner hour survives even marital breakup.

The series shows older people as complex individuals with interesting lives. This was a joy of watching "The Sopranos" — a very different scene to be sure, but one in which we are made to care about characters who are elderly and not gorgeous. Compare this to today's juvenile TV fare where older people, if they appear at all, come off as comic curmudgeons or shrill mothers-in-law.

In "Mad Men," suited gentlemen and ladies in cocktail dresses add an air of festivity to the formal dining establishments in which they enjoy a decidedly adult evening. Grownups don't arrive in overalls, even expensive ones. There are no strollers.

This sense of occasion has almost vanished in today's culture. Lost is a notion of difference between country and city, night and day, workweek and weekend.

Some younger viewers may scoff at the suits, ties and polished shoes required of the male go-getters. But these ambitious workers of the '60s generally left their offices after eight hours and didn't work at all on weekends. So which is the liberated generation?

American life now blends into one undifferentiated mass. People do texting at fancy restaurants. They wear suburban knock-around clothes to nightclubs. Standards for neat, not to mention modest, dress are all but buried in suburban downtowns and malls.

Divorce and unwed motherhood happens in "Mad Men," but middle-class society still regards them as shocking events to be kept as private as possible. Broad disapproval of such breakdowns in the social order remain strong, and so they are relatively rare among "respectable" people.

In 1963, Connecticut's recently retired Sen. Prescott Bush (George H.W.'s father and George W.'s grandfather) announced that New York Gov. Nelson Rockefeller was unsuited to be president because of his divorce. What would Bush have thought in 2008, when his party's choice for vice president paraded her unmarried, pregnant teenage daughter before the nation's cameras — and the presidential pick shook hands on the tarmac with the girl's boyfriend, as though he were some national hero?

"Mad Men" is about flawed people facing the usual rough patches but for whom codes of behavior simplify the decision-making. It's also about how rules enable them to have more fun, as well.

To find out more about Froma Harrop, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL CO.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Odd... What Ms Harrop remembers as a "more orderly culture" with "rules for comportment," I remember as a pretentious era when my mother wore a hat and gloves to go to the grocery store and the word "breast" would not pass my father's lips, even in the context of chicken.
An "orderly culture" implies an authority--"culture" itself--maintaining that order, and that carries with a connotation of coercion. What's wrong with girls wearing nail polish, baring their navels or displaying cleavage in high school? Who does it hurt? Nevertheless, "culture" of that era associated an utterly artificial stigma to those acts. Not that long ago, historically speaking, girls in some cultures bared not only their navels but everything else as well, with no devastating--or even any--consequences of which I'm aware.
What is it about "divorce and unwed motherhood" that would deprive divorcees and unwed mothers of the respect of others? Other than the arbitrary prejudices, that is. What is it about suits, ties and polished shoes that makes a man a better man?
Conformity is for ants.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Henry Miller
Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:27 AM
Though I have never seen Mad Men, I have to agree with everything that you have said here. I am from what you would call the new generation of texting and less modesty, but I was lucky enough to be brought up in a fairly "old school" environment. My family still has dinner together, I only got my own phone about three months ago, and I still dont have cable. Yes, I am trying to upgrade my parents and get them into the "technology game" a little more to keep up the times, but I won't sacrifice that family dinner and close family to get it. I have always dreamed about a time when my life wasn't the rare one, and it seems that the 50's and 60's was that time. Honestly, I would love to go around wearing dresses and flowery hats and parading for womens rights. The world has changed so much in the last few years, and though some of that change is good, I agree with you that some of the "old times" should be brought back.
Comment: #2
Posted by: TIMBAP_KEH
Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:58 AM
TIMBAP_KEH and I seem to have a point-counterpoint thing going. :-)
Comment: #3
Posted by: Henry Miller
Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:05 PM
I agree completely with Henry Miller and sympathize with TIMBAP-KEH, but having watched the show's first seasons, I am mystified by Ms. Harrop's take. I think she has confused the clothes of her parents (the "adults") with the illusion of control that was the most basic goal of 60's society, even as its twenty- thirty- and forty-somethings went about the same efforts to deal with life as we do now (and I'm only five years younger than she) — but with a much more limited set of tools to understand what they were doing. How can we really miss the standardization and conformity that protected society if it also cloaked rampant racism, sexism, homophobia and wore its amoral business attitudes on its sleeve (not that the last has changed)? In essence, the breakdown of the "more orderly culture" was the guaranteed result of exposing what it was hiding and doing something about that. Don Draper may be something of a metaphor for the era, as if what made America a great country had been quietly replaced with something less laudable, something that was threatening to implode from the effort to keep the mask intact. In the end, I think Ms. Harrops analysis will not look as accurate as the series moves to the end of the 60's, when the real adults risked their lives to expose the hypocrisy.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Jim Carls
Sun Sep 5, 2010 10:20 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Froma Harrop
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 11 Feb 2012
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 11 Feb 2012
Jamie Stiehm
Jamie StiehmUpdated 10 Feb 2012

4 Feb 2010 The Urban Future Isn't All About Population Booms

23 Sep 2008 Wall Street Did What Came Naturally

30 Jun 2009 For Straying Pols, It's the Hurt That Matters